Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

Hi, I'm kind of curious about this. Why not import those property lines? I'm not arguing for them, because it seems like a lot of work. But I note that in cities such as Fresno, they are in the map as landuse=residential. What if we add all the buildings, all the trees, every bench? Why not

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

Hi, On 07/29/2016 03:42 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: > Thanks for pointing out my lapse. You are correct. I've used parcel > boundaries for parks a number of time. Nonetheless (in order not to confuse the original poster) let's reiterate that property lines themselves do not belong in OSM; only

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

Clifford Snow writes: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, teslas_moustache < > teslas_mousta...@riseup.net> wrote: > >> I'm not sure if property lines and ownership are useful. And I don't >> think that building outlines are included, so I may need to continue >> with