Bill Ricker writes:
> The PokeStop was at our exact target, "1899 MIT Observatory site" which is
> moderately well known (on the park map, in FourSquare). [1]
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/944663159#map=19/42.44109/-71.08359=D
https://www.ingress.com/intel?pll=42.441303,-71.085092
>
As an ingress player, I can confirm use of ingress data for pokestops and
gyms. Same location descriptions and images submitted by ingress players.
Ingress saw a huge influx of new users when Pokemon Go launched. People
created ingress accounts just so that they could use the ingress Intel map
to
Hi Tod,
On 01/05/2017 09:26 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
> I monitor a number of places I’ve done mapping in and suspect I’ll be back to
> in the future. Today I noticed a change set that covers nearly all of
> California and Nevada [1]. It looks like this same mapper has even done some
> changes
On 2017.01.05. 22:34, Bill Ricker wrote:
> I have a possible confirmation that PokeGo is using OSM Points of
> Interest to populate features, but not of edit vandalism.
>
> We went onto local hiking trails to document some local science history,
> taking my daughter along for company and having
I have a possible confirmation that PokeGo is using OSM Points of Interest
to populate features, but not of edit vandalism.
We went onto local hiking trails to document some local science history,
taking my daughter along for company and having someone under 50 to keep an
eye on us oldsters. She
I monitor a number of places I’ve done mapping in and suspect I’ll be back to
in the future. Today I noticed a change set that covers nearly all of
California and Nevada [1]. It looks like this same mapper has even done some
changes that span continents [2].
I guess I prefer geographically
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 337,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8535/
We apoligize to send a wrong URL in our last email.
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?:
On 1/4/2017 10:46 PM, James Mast wrote:
I tested out the new 2016 TN link in JOSM before I sent the original
email and it worked perfectly fine for me.
I looked again and all is working now! It had been unusable for
several weeks around the USGS transition, and I thought the whole NAIP
8 matches
Mail list logo