Re: [Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Data

Joe, Thanks for letting us know about Dakota County's data. Ideally someone from the area will step forward to use the data. A lot of us, in the US at least, believe an import can help build a community. It's is important that we have a community in place to help maintain the data once it's

Re: [Talk-us] RRFB Tag

The wiki page seems to suggest that it should be flashing_lights=button instead of having the separate button_operated tag. But I'm not sure if that tagging actually makes more sense than the one you suggested. Harald. On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:40 PM Spencer Gardner

Re: [Talk-us] RRFB Tag

Perhaps I can answer my own question. I hadn't noticed the flashing_lights=yes suggestion in the wiki. So does a scheme like this make sense?: crossing=uncontrolled flashing_lights=yes button_operated=yes On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Spencer Gardner wrote: > Is

[Talk-us] RRFB Tag

Is there a conventional way to tag Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons ? These are effectively crosswalks with additional signage and user-activated flashing yellow lights. The crossing=traffic_signals tag seems

[Talk-us] Dakota County, MN Data

If anyone is interested, there are some datasets available to update streets, county parks and municipal boundaries in Dakota County, MN. (my employer) This is the same data we give to Esri for their basemaps. I’ve posted links and more information on my blog -

Re: [Talk-us] Open Building datasets for San Jose, Fremont and Berkeley

Hi, I reviewed the data awhile back for San Jose and found that it was high quality and definitely worth being imported. Yes, by all means please feel free to jump in on this import! It will a great addition to connect other imports done in the Bay Area. There are a few buildings that I and others