Are you subscribed to the OpenStreetMap US Newsletter? Check out the latest
issue here https://mailchi.mp/osmnewsletter/the-openstreetmap-us-newsletter and
subscribe here
https://us3.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=162692bfdedb78ec46fd108a3=801ce00e6d
!
The Newsletter will continue to be released
> Clay Smalley wrote:
> Thanks, all. This pretty much confirms what I expected. I'll go ahead and
> bring them back to railway=station.
Clay, I know it is an extra ask, I request that you document how you're doing
this at (minimally):
Thanks, all. This pretty much confirms what I expected. I'll go ahead and
bring them back to railway=station.
-Clay
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:34 AM Harald Kliems wrote:
> FWIW, the German wiki page for railway=halt has a section that
> acknowledges that the German definition and international
FWIW, the German wiki page for railway=halt has a section that acknowledges
that the German definition and international usage differ: "Outside the
German-speaking world, railway=halt is defined as an unimportation railway
station that only has the most basic equipment and isn't staffed (in
I forgot to mention that I have also directly edited the OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
wiki itself by sprinkling several "In North America..." text blurbs. These are
nearly always left intact by other wiki reviewers (and that page is very well
watched and heavily/strictly "policed" for accuracy).
Good question, Clay. I agree with Joseph's recommendation to revert to
railway=station. Germany (likely the densest national rail network in the
world, as well as home to OpenRailwayMap.org) has a rather exacting set of
definitions for distinct specificity on its rail in OSM, to the point
On 1/8/2020 9:20 AM, James Mast wrote:
Honest mistakes on his end? Perhaps.� But I'm just seeing way too many
downgrades to be conformable with his 'highway type' changes to be
honest.� There's probably quite a few roads that he retagged as primary
that need to be re-upgraded to trunk and
Clay Smalley writes:
> Over the last few months, I've been doing some systematic improvements to
> the passenger railway network across North America. Much of this has been
> filling out public_transport=stop_area relations for every railway station,
> including stop positions and platforms, as
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:15 PM Tod Fitch wrote:
> In my area there seems to be a mix of how the US Forest Service route
> numbers are tagged on roads and trails. The main variations seem to be:
>
> name=“Forest Route 9N24”
> name=“FR 9N24”
> alt_name=“Forest Route 9N24”
> alt_name=“FR 9N24”
>
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 8:22 AM James Mast wrote:
> As for restoring the 'motorway' roads, I've honestly just been manually
> fixing them. Sure, takes longer, but allows me to catch the 'Emergency
> U-Turn' crossovers that are improperly tagged as a '_link', and fix them at
> the same time.
Well, I have noticed he has downgrade a ton of roads that were 'trunk' for 6+
years, which leads me to be believe they were tagged correctly if no other
local mapper touched them in that time period. There were also a few ways in
that changeset you mentioned that he changed to secondary that
FYI the user also joined the changeset discussion as of recently. Based on
the message and previous changeset comments (e.g. "trunk-primary fixes
(that i messed up)" in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79132672#map=12/28.4681/-81.4027)
it seems to be an honest mistake.
I can help out with
12 matches
Mail list logo
