Just a general remark: we have active fire fighters contributing and using OSM
in many places around the globe maybe it's time for a global exchange of ideas
and a common forum for that?
Simon
PS: unluckily HOT and FOSM are already taken so a acronym will need some work
:-)
Am 4. Februar
The answer the OP was looking for is likely https://www.gnssplanning.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Am 24. Juni 2019 19:18:26 MESZ schrieb Greg Troxel :
>One wonders how RTC squares this decision with their legal obligation
>to
>act in the public interest. Not sharing data at all to get "related
>income" to fund their operation is one thing, but sharing with Google
>while not with OSM
Jumping in here slightly unwarranted, but what the heck :-).
I think the question is less where N vs S California is but more if
there is a regional split of California that would make sense from a
processing pov. Is for example somebody likely to do something with a
North-CA extract, or if you
t; automatically pulled into a local copy?
>
> (If a changeset has been reviewed by a second person - can that
> information be provided).
>
> All I want is something that allows me to be a little bit more
> conservative in accepting edits, without requiring complex processes
> or l
osmcha (osmcha.mapbox.com) already does most of this. While detecting
vandalism in general is difficult, edits like those in question are easy
to detect and small in number.
IMHO it really isn't an issue with openstreetmap in this case, as even
with the delay (somebody reported the user in
>> in Price George...) (Robert Yaklin)
>>3. Re: Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import
>> in Price George...) (Marc Gemis)
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 05:47:27 +0200
>> From:
Am 10.06.2018 um 05:21 schrieb Bryan Housel:
>> I'm also interested in how others feel about Slack. Is it good for the
>> community or should we look elsewhere?
> Glad you asked! I think Slack has changed the way I work for the better.
>
> Here are some advantages..
> * lower barrier to entry
While I don't think supporting specific, rather questionable business
models, is something we should expend a lot of effort on, improving the
tooling for individual businesses to maintain an entry in OSM is (and a
serious SEO shop could easily use such tools).
Some may have already had a look at
As has already been suggested you can do this with OSMTracker, however
(and I used it a lot for gathering house numbers) IMHO voice annotations
are really too easy to get wrong in one way or the other and just tend
to turn in to a rather stressful experience.
If you have a reasonably regular
The street in question is Stevens Boulevard
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/41.64710/-81.42325 it seems that
there is an issue mainly with trucks and speeding, seems like a
classical rat run.
There seems to be a "no trucks" restriction and potentially lower max
speed on the road itself
We've (data & legal) received a request to remove a street in
Willoughby, Ohio for safety reasons. It does seem as if a couple of
things are rather under mapped there (speed limits, access and so on,
not to mention POIs, but that's a different story). Anybody on the list
in the vicinity that could
ood reason/explanation for those
> deletions. Looks like a clear case for a revert. I'm not confident
> enough in my revert abilities, though.
> Harald, Madison (WI)
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
See at least the last 5 or so changesets here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JuggernautMapper/history
Walter has already commented on one of the changesets but maybe somebody
local should have a look at the edits and potentially revert.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
We've been having issues on and off for a while now (now and then with a lot
longer delays than 2 hours), as I understand from Tom this is due to a large
number of bogus spammy subscription requests.
Simon
On 12 August 2017 02:03:03 CEST, Rihards wrote:
>On 2017.08.12.
Am 27.07.2017 um 16:23 schrieb Bryan Housel:
> TODO: We don’t have a template letter, or clear guidelines on which
> imagery licenses are compatible with our use, and we should.
> See https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/166 . Like
> you said in your other email, tracing is
Just to put the whole thing into perspective: the current run rate of
SEO fake accounts in the US seems to be reasonably low. I counted 5 for
the last 7 days, that is roughly 2% of new mappers in the US during
those 7 days.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 05.07.2017 um 17:27 schrieb Greg Morgan:
>
>
> Am 01.07.2017 um 08:33 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> ...given that we have a known US based SEO company that has created
> (literally) 1000s of such accounts (but with slightly less spammy
> edits), and "we" haven't
Am 01.07.2017 um 12:48 schrieb Walter Nordmann:
> hi simon,
>
>
> Am 01.07.2017 um 08:33 schrieb Simon Poole:
>>
>> I've already touched on this with the sys admins and saved refs to
>> the ones that I fixed. However it is unlikely that we will do any
>> thing
and
on the other hand, given that we have a known US based SEO company that
has created (literally) 1000s of such accounts (but with slightly less
spammy edits), and "we" haven't taken any action, why should we in this
case?
Simon
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Simon Po
anks,
> Ian
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> I would suggest that TeleNav fixes the mess they made here
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402471851#map=18/34.18198/-118.39599
> <
I would suggest that TeleNav fixes the mess they made here
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402471851#map=18/34.18198/-118.39599
themselves.
Am 30.06.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> I''m in the process of fixing a couple of these. and I couldn't help
> noticing that some of t
A good example is "Box-n-Go Self Storage North" road in North Hollywood
(I believe it should really be Laurel Canyon Boulevard) I would suggest
TeleNav cleaning that up themselves.
Am 30.06.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> I''m in the process of fixing a couple of these
I''m in the process of fixing a couple of these. and I couldn't help
noticing that some of them can't simply be reverted because the TeleNav
data team has added lane tagging on them
Simon
Am 30.06.2017 um 18:21 schrieb Clifford Snow:
> Edits, from what appears to be a search engine
Andrew, could you perhaps weigh in on
https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/281 ? It seems to be
rather silly to not be showing the best imagery as default in the
editors (as I suspect we are doing for Texas).
Thanks
Simon
On 25.05.2017 18:10, Andrew Matheny wrote:
> Jinal-
>
> I
Am 16.01.2017 um 15:08 schrieb Christoph Hormann:
> On Sunday 15 January 2017, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Given that Washington is supposedly the global centre of mapping
>> goodness, I hope we might be able to find somebody there that perhaps
>> is interested in fixing the,
While investigating a complaint to legal today in the vicinity of Denton
Maryland, I couldn't help noticing that while Choptank River has a
horribly broken, imported river bank, it seems to be missing the river.
See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/38.9018/-75.8339
Given that
The ODbL is very clear on what "Publicly" is:
“Publicly” – means to Persons other than You or under Your control by
either more than 50% ownership or by the power to direct their
activities (such as contracting with an independent consultant).
No need to speculate on that point.
On the other
Am 26.02.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Richard Welty:
>
> the problem is that detecting the condition is pretty expensive.
> consider long, straight boundaries that pass through your
> bounding box. the search to find these segments of ways
> might have to range out pretty far.
>
>
Pretty far == the whole
mouth Drive" ("addr:housenumber"="415")
>>"addr:street"="Rudd Road" ("addr:housenumber"="219")
>>"addr:street"="Shadow Mountain Terrace"
>("addr:housenumber"="1144")
>>
OSMOSE does that http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/
Am 07.12.2015 um 00:06 schrieb Tod Fitch:
> I’ve come across data from an old address import that seems to have numerous
> duplicate addresses. It would be nice to point JOSM to the places with the
> most problems rather than to just
to confuse things in Germany it is colloquially quite common to
refer to any motorcycle as "moped" (even my 1300cc beemer)
Am 02.12.2015 um 10:13 schrieb Paul Johnson:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
>
&g
Miller:
> I'm not familiar with the MUTCD, and a little Googling didn't get me
> any clarification, but I'm guessing that "motor-driven cycles" refers
> to mopeds and such, not to motorcycles.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:21 AM Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
>
t;
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:23 AM Ben Miller <bborkmil...@gmail.com
> <mailto:bborkmil...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm not familiar with the MUTCD, and a little Googling didn't get
> me any clarification, but I'm guessing that "motor-driven cycles"
>
To give us all a break from the usual political machinations at this
time of year I've drawn up the following table
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_MUTCD_exclusionary_signs_to_OSM_access
The context is the work I've been doing on
https://github.com/simonpoole/beautified-JOSM-preset which
the sign up process without creating a cascade of
further problems.
Simon
PS: given that this is slowly getting very off topic , I would suggest
carrying on the discussion on the legal-talk list.
Am 18.11.2015 um 02:26 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman:
&g
I assume that you have got legal advice on the COPPA related
consequences of your activities and are willing to share this with the OSMF?
Simon
Am 17.11.2015 um 02:45 schrieb Steven Johnson:
> Hello list,
>
> Just in time for #OSMGeoweek, TeachOSM with support from Mapstory.org
> and American
der the age of 13. What is the issue?
>
> -Kate
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch
> <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote:
>
> Thais good, but doesn't address the OSM side of things.
>
> Historically, aka pre 2013 revisi
Am 18.11.2015 um 01:26 schrieb Kate Chapman:
> Hi Simon,
>
> The groups releasing Geobadges "TeachOSM with support from
> Mapstory.org and American Geographical Society" are not large
> multi-million dollar US organizations. None of them have highly paid
> in-house lawyers. Thank you for
gt; 2. We're removing the Grade 3-5 option, since clearly that would be
> marketed to under 13.
>
> Thanks for your concern. Hope I've addressed your question. Best regards,
>
>
> -- SEJ
> -- twitter: @geomantic
> -- skype: sejohnson8
>
> "Wretches, utter wretches
A quick reality check: forget scraping stuff from FB or any other
commercial operator of similar services (for legal/ToS reasons).
And second: there is already the OSM forums which, depending on region,
are quite popular.
Further: none-of the above are really a replacement for a integrated
No, I'm not going to tell you who to vote for in the elections :-).
However I believe there is some substantial misunderstanding of the
numbers involved.
Martijn noted in his manifesto that the daily editors numbers was flat
for the US and Michael used that as one of the corner points in his
Am 06.10.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Peter Dobratz:
...
a lot of stuff I was just going to write :-)
...
In any case, I believe it is important not to get trapped in the "old"
way of doing things. For the majority* of edits the "modern" (excluding
on device editing which actually works fine) way is
Besides having all the issues Keypadmapper has squared, how do you
prevent IP leakage from google to OSM? For example do you know if it
employs any "lock on road" or similar technology?
Simon
Am 06.10.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Adam Franco:
> For trail surveys and other GPS recording on Android I've
Randy,
I just want to point out that there is an existing and well established
OSM-based service that already supplies worldwide boundaries in a number
of formats https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundaries/ .
Further the operator runs daily quality checks on changes in the boundaries.
Simon
Am
Am 11.06.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Randy Meech:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote:
I just want to point out that there is an existing and well established
OSM-based service that already supplies worldwide boundaries in a number
are likely to become if you
stand in front of each building for up to several minutes before moving on.
On April 13, 2015 4:02:24 AM CDT, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
IMHO if you are actually entering stuff in to a mobile device, you may
as well use vespucci and just do
Am 14.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb John F. Eldredge:
If all you are doing on the spot is recording the house number, then
what is the advantage to using Vespucci instead of a simpler tool?
No further processing step, upload and you are finished.
Other stuff, POIs and so one will tend to take
IMHO if you are actually entering stuff in to a mobile device, you may
as well use vespucci and just do it properly the first time. But hten
I'm biased.
Simon
Am 12.04.2015 um 18:50 schrieb Greg Morgan:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com
Am 07.04.2015 um 16:51 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
...
is this something the OSMF lawyers have had a look into? Is the issue
really copyright or is this about trademark (regarding the names
GR PR etc.)? Currently it seems we are accepting what the Fédération
Francaise de la Randonnée
Am 08.04.2015 um 15:23 schrieb Russ Nelson:
Simon Poole writes:
The wiki already explains: they hold a trademark for GR which makes
using the official names of the routes essentially impossible in and
Perhaps French trademark law is different than US trademark law, but
in the US, you
Am 04.04.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Kate Chapman:
...
Small reality check (not saying that this is anybodies fault, just how
it is):
- the US community shapes how the project is perceived by the media globally
- US based companies control the majority of funds spent on OSM
development and have a
Am 03.04.2015 um 02:41 schrieb stevea:
Facts about the world
Simon Poole writes:
Up to now OSM has drawn the line in such a way that stuff that is
signposted and is observable on the ground is fair game (with some
exceptions, I believe the GR issue is still unsolved).
Yes, all
Am 04.04.2015 um 18:40 schrieb stevea:
Re: [Talk-us] Facts about the world
I respectfully and strenuously disagree. We still (and likely will)
continue to have some predictable and manageable problems with import
of data from third party sources, but we have procedures in place to
make
Am 04.04.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Alex Barth:
I just don't want to be called a couch potato in the course of it ;-)
Couch carrot? :-P
Seriously, I believe Frederik was more referring to how OSM is viewed by
third parties and the impression outsiders could get from the image we
tend to market. And
Am 02.04.2015 um 05:20 schrieb Russ Nelson:
...
April Fools! Yes, you can. There are many kinds of public domain maps
whose republication needs no license. For example, in the US all maps
published before the magic date, whatever year it is we're up to
now. Maps copyrighted but not renewed.
how other mappers work, even for contributors very
much ingrained in how they do it.
Simon
Am 09.03.2015 um 20:23 schrieb Clifford Snow:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote:
(obviously for nearly every thing except large scale
The real core question is: will you have newbies or not?
Old hands will have their favourite method of mapping anyway and are
unlikely to change (obviously for nearly every thing except large scale
geometry changes vespucci is the only reasonable solution :-)). For them
you simply need a
Am 13.01.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker:
...
In Montana I have removed rather than changed these POIs, as they definitely
no longer existed before the GNIS import. Removing these for all of the US
would be a good thing, especially for hospitals. We definitely don't want
people in an
Am 06.09.2014 15:19, schrieb Tod Fitch:
It is way too late now, but I think tagging of traveled ways would
have been better off it a simple highway=yes tag had been agreed to
with everything else in other tags like width=*, surface=*,
maxspeed=*, access=*, etc.
IMHO you should
Just a quick remark: there is already a tag short_name that is
supported for example by nominatim that can be used for storing a
contracted version of name for rendering and other purposes if necessary.
Simon
PS: these discussions are not unique to the states, even though the use
of contractions
Martijn
Wouldn't it be better to have this discussion on dev or tagging or at
least some where with a slightly larger audience than talk-us? In any
case the -really- important page is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
which is essentially the only
Am 03.06.2014 10:42, schrieb Minh Nguyen:
On 2014-06-02 13:24, Simon Poole wrote:
@stevea you would substantially help your cause if the route data was
available for inspection, best a public source from where it could be
obtained.
Here are the special committee minutes approving
Am 02.06.2014 06:28, schrieb Russ Nelson:
. Let's say that I follow this
route on my bicycle using a cue sheet and keep a GPS track. Then I load
my GPS track into JOSM and create a relation and call it USBRS #47 (or
whatever). How is this an import??
While
@stevea you would substantially help your cause if the route data was
available for inspection, best a public source from where it could be
obtained.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
It has been pointed out in numerous places before, but just in case you
missed it: there is an ongoing effort (since months) to remove all
catch alls from the standard style.
This implies that stuff you thought was rendered might vanish, but in
fact it was just accidental that it was shown in the
This is not the OSMF becoming involved in tagging :-) I'm guilty of
quite a bit of sidewalk mapping, even though I have some sympathy for a
generalized approach (adding a tag to the main road way). In reality, at
least here, this tends not to model the actual topology particularly
well. I do a
Yes, I believe that is fairly clear. We do however seem to have a clear
continuing increase in the average rate of new contributors too.
Simon
Am 14.03.2014 22:39, schrieb Richard Weait:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
And while I haven't updated my charts
Am 14.03.2014 21:47, schrieb Carol Kraemer:
..
Let's say that there are 1,500,000 registered users
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osmdbstats1_users.png as is
stated by the first graph. I will also look at the last year of % of
total users contributing where the highest
I wrote an unpublished blog article a week ago (obviously not in
response to post of Alex) that I've put online now
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/21225
It might be of interest where IMHO Alex didn't get it quite right.
Simon
without
speed tags in JOSM and set them to 25 mph.
Finally the pub: I didn't know it! It still remains to be answered.
Thank you for this interesting game,
Peter
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch wrote:
From the talk mailing list
Just a couple of observations from the other side of the Atlantic:
- please make it easy to contact your group without having to go through a sign
up procedure with yet another service. Not everybody is interested in joining
permamently and making a meetup account mandatory just means you wont
From the talk mailing list (mandatory disclosure: yes I know the authors).
Original-Nachricht
Hi there,
I'm very proud to announce that finally Kort[1] (the OSM game) writes
back it's collected solutions to OSM! All changes are made by the OSM
user kort-to-osm[2], so it's
Am 07.11.2013 06:20, schrieb Bryce Cogswell:
I have to agree with Jason on this as well. Admin borders are some of
the most important cartographic information on the planet, to the
extent that wars are fought over them, and are easily verified through
dozens of independent sources. To exclude
IMHO we shouldn't and I don't believe it is necessary to, give up the
principle of everybody can edit anything, even in the case of admin borders.
On the one hand we have cases where the borders are estimates generated
by mappers because there are no available and free sources, on the other
hand
Am 28.07.2013 17:51, schrieb stevea:
...
Re: [Talk-us] Spammy-sounding survey sent to my OSM inbox
I might be the nicest person you have ever met, I hope I am a good OSM
mapper, and I am kind to children and animals. However, I vehemently
oppose OSM collecting any additional
Am 19.07.2013 12:06, schrieb Kathleen Danielson:
Hi Clifford,
Wow--thanks for sharing those stats! They are really interesting!
I just took a look at the link you shared and it looks like we're
seeing the number of mappers contributing on any given day. Do you
know if it's possible to
Kushal
welcome to OSM. Please feel free to improve our data, while adding the
neighbourhoods as a first project is going to result in a fairly steep
learning curve for you, it is certainly doable.
Unluckily the map used in Wikipedia is unlikely to be usable directly in
OSM for licence reasons,
78 matches
Mail list logo