Re: [Talk-us] "System Continuity" in the Functional Classification network

> In this document is a concept called "System Continuity". In few words, a > roadway of a higher classification should not connect to a single roadway of > a lower classification, so the network remains interconnected. > Do you know if this concept applies to OSM roads network also? Motorway

Re: [Talk-us] "System Continuity" in the Functional Classification network

Frederik Ramm writes: > Hi, > > On 07.09.2017 16:51, Max Erickson wrote: >> Broadly speaking, yes, such continuity should apply. Maybe not using >> exactly the same rule as the US DOT. > > I know this is talk-us and I won't attempt to say anything USA specific > but such

Re: [Talk-us] "System Continuity" in the Functional Classification network

Hi, On 07.09.2017 16:51, Max Erickson wrote: > Broadly speaking, yes, such continuity should apply. Maybe not using > exactly the same rule as the US DOT. I know this is talk-us and I won't attempt to say anything USA specific but such continuity definitely does not apply world-wide in OSM

Re: [Talk-us] "System Continuity" in the Functional Classification network

Broadly speaking, yes, such continuity should apply. Maybe not using exactly the same rule as the US DOT. In practice there is an overfocus on observing how a given stretch of road is built and an underfocus on the role it plays in the network. My pet example is this stretch of US 2 & 41:

[Talk-us] "System Continuity" in the Functional Classification network

Hi all, I am researching Functional Classification in Detroit counties and I found a pdf from US Department of transportation - FHA entitled Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. (if someone is interested here's the link: