On 01/07/2017 06:49 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Also, we do have the implicit 30 mph tagged on many roads. While there
are usually not signs, it is entirely verifable. One only has to read
the law and measure the distance
Bill Ricker writes:
> the question then is, can we tell (without driving in circles) is if an
> existing 30 mph tag in Boston was implicit or explicit ... to find which
> might need fixing
No, you probably can't. Perhaps massdot will update and you can
compare. But, I
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Also, we do have the implicit 30 mph tagged on many roads. While there
> are usually not signs, it is entirely verifable. One only has to read
> the law and measure the distance between houses (or observe that the
> area is
Also, we do have the implicit 30 mph tagged on many roads. While there
are usually not signs, it is entirely verifable. One only has to read
the law and measure the distance between houses (or observe that the
area is built up with businesses). These two tasks are entirely within
the ability
Tod - "Makes sense to have the OSM tagging model the real world in this
regard. If we had that the a local mapper could update one value on the
administrative boundary and all the roads without explicit maxspeed tagging
would be covered."
Agreed. There isn't a better community than OSM to
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Jack Burke wrote:
> Hey, Michigan folks, keep an eye out for some speed limit changes [1]
We have a different change hitting Boston as of this last week -- the
statutory limit on *UNSIGNED* roads/streets in Boston has changed.
Statutory
6 matches
Mail list logo