On 22/08/2020 02:35, Clay Smalley wrote:
For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day
ban for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're
exhibiting right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850
Indeed, and it wasn't done lightly - only
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:36 PM Clay Smalley wrote:
> For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban
> for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting
> right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850
>
> jdd 3, please take a break.
For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban
for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting
right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850
jdd 3, please take a break. You have better things to do.
I look forward to when you
FYI;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct,
Deliberate adding incorrect data;
People who revert other people's work should expect to be able to demonstrate
that the reversion was well reasoned and proportionate
> If efforts to resolve the issue through discussion are unsuccessful perhaps this is an issue for the Data Working Group (DWG)?If this is where I think it is, I believe that I'm already offering advice to a complaint from one side of this dispute. I think that what happened was that 10 years
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:09 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> IF someone, not local, relying on satellite views, goes after my good
faith edit, based on my on the ground
>
> surveillance thinks my edit was wrong trying to fix broken polygon’s,
that are
IF someone, not local, relying on satellite views, goes after my good faith
edit, based on my on the ground
surveillance thinks my edit was wrong trying to fix broken polygon’s, that are
making ghosts lines on the
ID edit page. sends me a change-set discussion notice, telling me not to
Hi,
On 08/19/2018 07:27 AM, mr english wrote:
> What's the procedure for revert things like this?
If it's a "country" somewhere in the sea then it's relatively easy to
delete, and everyone is encouraged to delete obvious vandalism like that
on sight.
It is always a good idea to add a public
Hello
I stumbled upon this change set where a new country is added called
"Creedon Republic" over much of Canada, USA, and the Atlantic Ocean:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617866825
Digging into it, I saw the author created a number of seemingly bogus
changes:
I'd like to report vandalism from this user - (http://goo.gl/K0utbF) for
this changeset - (http://goo.gl/s1eooa)
Anyone have the DWG's email?
*Regards,*
*Hans*
*http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13*
Is this really vandalism or a user that wanted to add her/his company to
the map (o.a. for advertising purposes) and accidentally selected the
street instead of the building ?
regards
m
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd like to report
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 08:42 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
Is this really vandalism or a user that wanted to add her/his company
to the map (o.a. for advertising purposes) and accidentally selected
the street instead of the building ?
I fixed it. The comment I put on the changeset calls it
In this case I don't mind, the user made only one edit with the purpose of
advertising a business.
But imaging what the effect would be when you make your first edit in OSM,
and are immediately called vandal. Would you continue editing ? I doubt so.
IMHO The best solution in such a case is first
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 09:14 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
In this case I don't mind, the user made only one edit with the
purpose of advertising a business.
But imaging what the effect would be when you make your first edit in
OSM, and are immediately called vandal. Would you continue editing
Yeah, umm...I realize I have a bit of a history on this subject that I'd
rather not rehash in detail right now, but I'm going to have to concur that
we should not go zero to vandalism accusations for what definitely seems
well within a reasonable doubt of being a good faith newbie attempt gone
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 02:44 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
Yeah, umm...I realize I have a bit of a history on this subject that
I'd rather not rehash in detail right now, but I'm going to have to
concur that we should not go zero to vandalism accusations for what
definitely seems well within a
I'll attempt to reach out. But it always seems that these one edit users
never respond.
Regards,
Hans
On Oct 9, 2014 1:12 AM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 02:44 -0500, Paul Johnson wrote:
Yeah, umm...I realize I have a bit of a history on this subject that
It happens sometimes. Had a campground respond and ask if I'd be willing
to detail map their property for them.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Hans De Kryger hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'll attempt to reach out. But it always seems that these one edit users
never respond.
Regards,
I contacted the realty group through their website (
http://www.lovingphoenix.com)
Here is the conversation:
__
Welcome to LovingPhoenix.com. Is there anything I can help you with today?
→I looked you up, because It looks like you renamed North 77th
I think this is still a question for the DWG. I agree that it would be
great to look at case from a positive perspective. In that respect, It
would have been great if they just added a poi for the business, address,
etc However, when you look at the user page,
Since when has the DWG jurisdiction on user pages ?
IMHO the DWG can only interfere when the data of OSM was affected.
I'm not saying that I like that persons' user page, but where is it written
that you cannot advertise on that page?
regards
m
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Greg Morgan
On 10/9/14 11:24 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
I think this is still a question for the DWG. I agree that it would
be great to look at case from a positive perspective. In that
respect, It would have been great if they just added a poi for the
business, address, etc However, when you look at the
Alex (or anyone else),
If you find vandalism like this, please do not email DWG members
individually, but instead, you should:
1. Free free to revert it. You do not need permission to do so.
2. Message the user through the OSM message system
3. If you want help, please email
Changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21580748 by
user alejandroflores removed a series of roads in lower Manhattan:
http://cl.ly/image/3U0E262u0d1g
I just reverted with:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21582260
Using the JOSM reversion plugin.
Paul: could you block and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ZeGermanata/edits
Vandalism includes the following:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/21523281/history changing ref=US
41 to US 241
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/163035927/history fake motorway
bypass
25 matches
Mail list logo
