Guys all the SOTM votes are run by independent parties with additional
independent verification, you doing any of that here? It's a bias for one of
the people on the ballot sheet to be emailing asking for the your 5 votes.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 2/15/10 3:45 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:27 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
keep in mind that this is for a 6 month term, there is the opportunity to
put fixes
into the bylaws and
On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:45 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:27 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
keep in mind that this is for a 6 month term, there is the
On 2/15/10 4:02 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:45 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/15/10 3:27 PM, SteveC wrote:
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the interest in the US Local Chapter and expressing your
concern about the elections. Let me see if I can address your concerns
in this mail.
The working group that is working to create the United States local
chapter has made a lot of progress, but to go any further, it needs
Good point - I should have caught this in the '[Talk-us] Feburary 4th Minutes
and Election Update' email. Too many fricking emails.
I'm cool that kate is also overseeing
Good luck all!
On Feb 15, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for the interest in the US Local
With all the election work, I forgot to send out a link to the meeting
minutes for Feburary 11th. I'm correcting that mistake now. Here they
are:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcschwqz_26d4thbtcj
Also, here's the link for the US OSM Chapter:
7 matches
Mail list logo
