On 2/22/18 11:57 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just
>> "downgrading to track". There are a couple of options I suspect:
> In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right.
> Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong
On 22/02/2018 16:57, Greg Troxel wrote:
For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just
"downgrading to track". There are a couple of options I suspect:
In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right.
Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong notion
> For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just
> "downgrading to track". There are a couple of options I suspect:
In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right.
Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong notion of legal status
between a "road"
On Feb 21, 2018 23:29, "Nick Hocking" wrote:
I've always been of the opinion that any of the original TIGER data import
that has not yet been edited and does not have a name tag, should just be
deleted.
Then, and only then can the rural areas begin to be mapped
4 matches
Mail list logo