Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-22 Thread Richard Welty
On 2/22/18 11:57 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just >> "downgrading to track".  There are a couple of options I suspect: > In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right. > Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-22 Thread ajt1...@gmail.com
On 22/02/2018 16:57, Greg Troxel wrote: For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just "downgrading to track".  There are a couple of options I suspect: In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right. Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong notion

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-22 Thread Greg Troxel
> For the US, however, you'd want to do something other than just > "downgrading to track".  There are a couple of options I suspect: In the US, treating an unpaved road as "track" does not seem right. Besides the surface issue, there is a very strong notion of legal status between a "road"

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

2018-02-22 Thread Paul Johnson
On Feb 21, 2018 23:29, "Nick Hocking" wrote: I've always been of the opinion that any of the original TIGER data import that has not yet been edited and does not have a name tag, should just be deleted. Then, and only then can the rural areas begin to be mapped