Dave - super awesome.
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
Another random thought - should the addressing ways be one long way
with
On 13 Oct 2009, at 09:26, Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:20, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the
On 13 Oct 2009, at 9:20 , SteveC wrote:
Dave - super awesome.
As I said on IRC the other week, but I'll repeat here for all - I
think dumping the addressing for all 3,000 counties and then letting
people import them one by one will be the best way to do it.
yes this is the best way to get
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote:
It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be
possible
to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow
the
road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much
different than
the road path when
4 matches
Mail list logo
