, 2018 11:28 PM>To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org>Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair>>> As a member of the US community, I'm in favor of reverting the bad >> edits, even if it remove
com>
To: Michael Reichert <osm...@michreichert.de>, Talk-us
<talk-us@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Undiscussed mass-revert by user Nakaner-repair
Message-ID: <232049907.3007698.1524317234...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8&quo
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Nakaner
This is an epic effort and appreciated.
But there are two things that need to be cleared up.
> The choice was to either
Thank you Michael for your thorough history of the situation. I think it
clearly explains what has happened and is still happening.
I personally am not sure how to go forward. I suppose that there will
always be mappers who are not following good practices and I suppose
that those who are paid to
On 20/04/2018 16:13, Ian Dees wrote:
Some questions:
Was this action made under the auspices of the Data Working Group?
No
Has the "directed mapping" policy been approved by the OSMF?
No, although the refusal to interact with other mappers and the mass
creation of sock-puppet accounts
On Friday 20 April 2018, Ian Dees wrote:
>
> I'd be interested in seeing all of these reverts reverted (at least
> in the US) until discussion can take place.
I don't know about these changes or the reverts of them in detail but on
a general note here: If mappers find edits they consider
Hi All,
I noticed that user Nakaner-repair just reverted 1000+ changesets
throughout the United States without any discussion in the local community.
Nakaner-repair points to a thread in the German forum [0] that seems to
indicate that they think these edits were made by paid mappers. Having not
7 matches
Mail list logo
