On 20 Feb 2008, at 00:56, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Jordan said, in a recent response to one of my posts and comparing ODL
to a PD-type license:
I personally am neutral on a preference between the two and think
that it would be wholly inappropriate for me to recommend one or the
other to OSM. I
On Feb 19, 2008 11:54 PM, John Wilbanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone. My name is John Wilbanks. I am the VP for Science Commons
at Creative Commons, and I'm the one who wrote the Protocol for
Implementing Open Access to Data.
I've been lurking here for a couple of weeks. I don't like
A Morris wrote:
Think of it more as watermarking
One could also make a case for their being different levels of severity
of watermark. A completely fictitious street is one thing; a
fictitious wayside cross is another. Although I suppose, for the
watermark to be effective, you would need to
A Morris wrote:
Think of it more as watermarking
One could also make a case for their being different levels of severity
of watermark. A completely fictitious street is one thing; a
fictitious wayside cross is another. Although I suppose, for the
watermark to be effective, you would need to
Hi,
Interspersed within all the facts in the OSM data dump are a number
of non-factual elements. There are both accidental errors and
probably quite a few *deliberate* errors (I know of some).
I have taken the liberty of modifying the Copyright Easter Eggs
article on the Wiki to
Hi,
It would be naive to think that the OSM database is totally error
free.
Of course, but until now I thought it was our common goal to make it
as error free as we can, and in fact when I talked about OSM I
presented it as somewhat morally superior to those evil data
providers who lie
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It would be naive to think that the OSM database is totally error
free.
Of course, but until now I thought it was our common goal to make it
as error free as we can, and in fact when I talked about OSM I
A Morris wrote:
Think of it more as watermarking
One could also make a case for their being different levels of severity
of watermark. A completely fictitious street is one thing; a
fictitious wayside cross is another. Although I suppose, for the
watermark to be effective, you would need to
Hi,
The issue was quite simple. We need to have a license that better
protects the OSM data
Do we? What's the threat? How has it been assessed?
and clarifies how the data can be used so that
the project can effectively deliver what it set out to deliver.
It set out to deliver a free world
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:50:48AM +, SteveC wrote:
No, the total opposite.
We only found out about some of the implications of certain use cases,
and how it makes some use a bit easier, when we sat down with Jordan
in a cafe and threw around ideas and scenarios.
Please don't try
10 matches
Mail list logo
