(Just some musings, not sure I have much to contribute to this thread)
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well I think route=mtb is more or less a consensus. Differentiation to
route=bicycle is in 99% of all routes clear. It's more on the
Good!
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Then we need a differentiation between oneday roundtrip routes (local)
from A to B to A, and routes spanning multiple days (usually regional)
from A to B to C.
Do we? For starters, that seems pretty arbitrary: there are routes
that some people
On 17.01.2010 11:43, Liz wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Then we need a differentiation between oneday roundtrip routes (local)
from A to B to A, and routes spanning multiple days (usually regional)
from A to B to C.
Do we? For starters, that seems pretty
On 17.01.2010 11:43, Liz wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Then we need a differentiation between oneday roundtrip routes (local)
from A to B to A, and routes spanning multiple days (usually regional)
from A to B to C.
Do we? For starters, that seems pretty
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
If renderer XYZ renders amenity=llibrary with a library icon (to catch
a common typo), then we could document that somewhere on a page about
renderer XYX. However we definitely should not document this as a valid tag
on the
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Network=mtb makes not much sense in my eye (and was never discussed,
approved, proposed...) as we can't differentiate then anymore between
local and regional mtb routes.
The question therefore is, what values
On Saturday 16 January 2010 13:59:44 Steve Bennett wrote:
I'm sick of stupid flamewars, so I'll just say, I disagree, all
information about a tag is relevant, in the absence of a central
authority, and leave it that.
If you are sick of what you call stupid flamewars, then you should think more
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
If you are sick of what you call stupid flamewars, then you should think more
and write less.
Yes, this is very much the approach I intend to take. We could
probably all heed the advice. A moderator on the list probably
On 16.01.2010 14:04, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Network=mtb makes not much sense in my eye (and was never discussed,
approved, proposed...) as we can't differentiate then anymore between
local and regional
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Adrian Moisey adr...@changeover.za.netwrote:
I've managed to get pieces of it to render on the cycle map:
http://osm.org/go/kaIGiwl?layers=00B0FTF'
Interestingly this appears as a GREEN cycle route, presumably because it's
tagged route=bicycle+network=mtb. I
On 15.01.2010 11:22, Richard Mann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Adrian Moisey
adr...@changeover.za.net mailto:adr...@changeover.za.net wrote:
I've managed to get pieces of it to render on the cycle map:
http://osm.org/go/kaIGiwl?layers=00B0FTF'
Interestingly this appears
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Felix Hartmann
extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
I took it out again. I will be too confusing to have network=mtb.
a) there are also networks for mtb routes. (e.g. Alpentour Austria, a 21 day
mtb route going from Vienna, over Lower Austria into Styria )
b)
On Saturday 16 January 2010 00:47:43 Steve Bennett wrote:
Suggestion: if the Cycle Map supports a given tag, then we should
document that fact. Now, whether we want to deprecate it is a separate
question, but removing correct, relevant information doesn't really
help the cause.
If renderer
On 16.01.2010 01:27, Cartinus wrote:
On Saturday 16 January 2010 00:47:43 Steve Bennett wrote:
Suggestion: if the Cycle Map supports a given tag, then we should
document that fact. Now, whether we want to deprecate it is a separate
question, but removing correct, relevant information
Seems fine to me. Just hasn't been rerendered on all zoom-levels yet.
(Zoom-level 13 seems to be correct)
Konrad
2010/1/15 Adrian Moisey adr...@changeover.za.net:
Hi
I'm having troubles getting a cycle route to render.
The relation is: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/367273
15 matches
Mail list logo
