Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 25/04/2017 13:51, Greg Troxel wrote: However, if one renders and one doesn't, in the default style, that's a bug, and presumably someone can make a pull request to fix it - it seems obviously uncontroversial. You'd have thought so, but a project maintainer closed exactly that issue at

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

Oleksiy Muzalyev writes: > Both "man_made=tower;tower:type=communications" and "man_made=mast" > are being used interchangeably. One of them is rendered with a good > icon and another not rendered at all on the OSM map. > I was not suggesting to re-tag this

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

Both "man_made=tower;tower:type=communications" and "man_made=mast" are being used interchangeably. One of them is rendered with a good icon and another not rendered at all on the OSM map. I was not suggesting to re-tag this particular communication mast per se, but to attract an attention to

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

All what is written at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation is fair enough, especially the main principle: "We map anything that is observable on the ground.", but not an airspace. A communication tower, or a mast is well observable on the ground. The DJI changed the map on its RPAS

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 22/04/2017 07:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: It is possible to map it as: "man_made=mast", "height=190", etc., then it will be rendered. In the general case, please don't suggest that people mistag things just so that one particular renderer (one that probably isn't used by the majority of

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation Pilots do not use the osm base map... /Andreas Skickat från min iPhone > 23 apr. 2017 kl. 07:50 skrev Oleksiy Muzalyev : > >> On 22.04.17 21:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> >> sent from a phone >> >>> On

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 22.04.17 21:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 22. Apr 2017, at 08:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: In my opinion, it is a significant issue, in fact a disaster waiting to happen. There will be soon air-born taxi in Dubai, Singapore, etc., and

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 22 April 2017 at 07:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: > It is possible to map it as: "man_made=mast", "height=190", etc., then it > will be rendered. I have now changed the objects to use this method. (As noted previously, I have no height data for the Portuguese mast)

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

sent from a phone > On 22. Apr 2017, at 08:33, Oleksiy Muzalyev > wrote: > > In my opinion, it is a significant issue, in fact a disaster waiting to > happen. There will be soon air-born taxi in Dubai, Singapore, etc., and the > extremely high communication

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 22.04.17 00:56, Andy Mabbett wrote: the Sutton Coldfield (England) TV mast: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton_Coldfield_transmitting_station at: http://www.opensntreetmap.org/?mlat=37.08321=-8.13643#map=17/37.0832/-8.1364 is a significant landmark, visible for several miles,

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

sent from a phone > On 22. Apr 2017, at 01:37, Andy Townsend wrote: > > The current tagging (man_made=tower; tower:type=communication) looks OK to me. The word "communication" to me means a two-way exchange of information/ideas (mutual, e.g. a phone call). For

Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging and rendering of television masts

On 21/04/2017 22:56, Andy Mabbett wrote: the Sutton Coldfield (England) TV mast: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton_Coldfield_transmitting_station at: http://www.opensntreetmap.org/?mlat=37.08321=-8.13643#map=17/37.0832/-8.1364 That's the one in Portugal, I think? Sutton