To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tapestry has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Does anyone have any strong feelings about possibly incorporating testng
into some of the 4.1 unit tests?
The good part about this is that testng can happily run any junit test (as
well as the eclipse plugin), along with a number of additional useful
features:
-) Using assertions : The testng
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-tapestry Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by GeoffLongman:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/Tapestry5Roadmap
P.S. This is what the new maven2 surefire report should more or less look
like (notice the main diff being the hide/unhide of exception data)
http://testng.org/doc/samplereport/index.html
On 2/11/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any strong feelings about possibly
Just thought it was a funny story to share. Was at my friends company
yesterday poking around and after doing a bit of back and forth with the dev
group found myself being forced to describe some of the differences between
the action based frameworks and tapestry.
The funny part was that I
The actions are still there, I think of them as verbs. The
difference is that the page/component structure of Tapestry gives us
nouns as well. In that way, a very few verbs, combined with a wide
range of nouns, gives us the language of Tapestry. Action-oriented
frameworks are a language that is,
Author: jkuhnert
Date: Sat Feb 11 14:57:45 2006
New Revision: 377078
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377078view=rev
Log:
Added a new property selection model class, more timetracker demo work
Added:
jakarta/tapestry/trunk/examples/TimeTracker/src/context/WEB-INF/Home.page
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:28:01 -0500, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone have any strong feelings about possibly incorporating testng
into some of the 4.1 unit tests?
The good part about this is that testng can happily run any junit test
(as
well as the eclipse plugin),
Parallel thinking ... I've been using testng for ePluribus and liking
it a lot. I don't have any objections, it's just an issue about
setting up the build properly. I think the HiveMind conversion to
Maven2 as a dry run, then a Tapestry conversion to Maven2.
On 2/11/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-tapestry Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by HarishKrishnaswamy:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/TapestryTLP
The comment on the change is:
Added myself to PMC
I would like to continue to be on the Tapestry PMC and have added myself in
the wiki. Hope I can squeeze in.
Harish Krishnaswamy: +1 (binding)
On 1/30/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is the final text of the vote; for the moment, I've pencilled in
myself as the chair, as
Fair enough. Brett has assured me that despite being snowed in he will be
applying the patches needed for maven2, so I'll post an update once that is
all official.
On 2/12/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parallel thinking ... I've been using testng for ePluribus and liking
it a
Just being curious, what caused the need for creating an xml file? Only
because of my recent interactions.
I can say at the very least that in maven2, unless you have some weird
runtime DataProvider stuff to setup there is actually 0 configuration that
needs to be done. Unless you wanted only a
13 matches
Mail list logo
