On 4/28/06, Brian K. Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done some Maven (1) projects so I don't think it'll be such a shock
getting it broken up the way we want it. I'm just looking at how Forrest
does its job and cringe.
I'll work on it and then post back my results - make sure I'm on the
I see a lot of commits in the tapestry4/branches/4.0 area about new
good documentation and i don't see merged in trunk.
Does the next pending 4.x release be built from tapestry4/branches/4.0
or tapestry4/trunk ?
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
On 4/27/06, Andreas Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently:
- tapestry4/trunk is Jesse's work = Tapestry 4.1
- tapestry4/branches/4.0 = Tapestry 4.0.x
Thanks for the clarification.
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
On 4/24/06, Norbert Sándor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Code cleanup, Ant integration, and minor XSL template cleanup are to be
done before a release.
This is great stuff, I'm looking for it to be part of the standard Tapestry doc.
Thanks.
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
On 4/23/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must have missed the discussion (on this list). The tapestry4
layout is transitional. As we get things broken up a little and
converted into Maven2 builds, you'll see a more sensible layout.
No i didn't, the same goal could have
I think the current repo layout is somewhat confusing, by my point of view.
I see tapestry5 main dir as the trunk/HEAD/CURRENT which involve the
development of the leading edge features and improvements while
tapestry4/trunk and all dirs under tapestry4/branches/ (which includes
old
On 4/11/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless we do what I suggested a while back and make Tapestry just a servlet
filter mapped to /* and not an actual Servlet. That way, the URL patterns
can be configured via HiveMind.
I remember also someone wishing to show a proof of concept,
On 4/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Kuhnert +1
Massimo Lusetti: +1
Even if they're now fixed for 4.0.1 I'm looking for pom.xml by 4.0.2
at ibiblio.org
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (even only for 4 branch)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/22/06, Brian K. Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. :-) Hopefully there will come to be a single place for all things
tapestry. I understand the multitude - Tacos, Tassel, JavaForge and the
like - but it gets a bit distracting for such a componentized
framework to have so many places
On 3/13/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the process of cleaning up a couple core interfaces
(IEngine/IRequestCycle/IPage/etc...) it is now not possible to get the
IScriptSource from the engine (as it is injectable).
This has made most of the validators in
On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jkuhnert
Date: Wed Mar 8 15:57:46 2006
New Revision: 384381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384381view=rev
Log:
Applied all of brian's fixes, added a new jetty6 Workbench launcher
Thanks!
--
Massimo
On 3/6/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure tacos can benefit from working with it, but the only problem that
I'd think tapestry would have would be navigation. It may be a personal
peeve, but I don't like the idea of people having to navigate away from
the main site to see the
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jkuhnert
Date: Wed Feb 15 15:20:09 2006
New Revision: 378117
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378117view=rev
Log:
Only way I know how to update these without svn screwing up
Does this help?
On 2/4/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not seeing anything even hinting at rejection, but let's let this vote
run for the full week.
I don't think Jesse will step in for chair even if you'll wait two weeks :)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
On 2/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to admit that I don't know what XMLC is, can you give a very brief
summary ?
Well, XMLC works taking an HTML template file and then generating a
java file containing all the methods to access the tag marked by the
id attrbute, the java
Sorry i mean to send this to the dev list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 2, 2006 12:46 PM
Subject: Components IDS (was: Tapestry 4.1 AJAX support)
To: Tapestry users tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org
I take this portion of Jesse's mail
it!
I'm sorry Howard :)
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/12/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problems seem to stem from failures when I attempt to switch.
The only solution seems to be to delete the workspace and re-create it.
I've switched working copy from one branch to another a lot of time
and got no problem but always via
On 1/12/06, Geoff Longman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now my productivity is falling as I don't trust subclipse to not
fuck up my workspace. I have to check by hand that the revs in my
workspace are the right revs.
Yes, subclipse has a lot of gotcha, i end up using svn from command
line and
On 1/10/06, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone up for tapestry.apache.org? (I noticed we did have a discussion
about this back in March.)
+1 for me
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe,
and some irritating bugs have
been fixed.
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
As a side note, does is the latest release with the current schema?
Does the next ones goes as in tomcat and others apache's projects
(released and then voted stable)?
Ciao
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
On 12/25/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hold the presses! commons FileUpload 1.1 is finally out, which means
we can likely support uploads properly for both servlets and for
portlets. So ... make this a last-minute change for 4.0, or wait
until 4.0.1 and 4.1?
Put it in 4.0
On 12/20/05, Geoff Longman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks like a persistence layer failure though.
It has happened in the past and there's was also a big discussion
thread about that.
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
On 12/21/05, Geoff Longman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but before the problem was having to repost a comment many times
to get it to 'stick'. Yesterday morning the main page was DEAD - ie.
showing thier custom Tapestry exception page.
http://meridio.blogspot.com/2005/04/exception-day.html
On 12/14/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, all the XML documentation files for Forrest will shortly have to
change over for use with Maven; I'm looking for/writing an XSLT to do
most of the work.
Wow, that's should be a good test bad, I'm still eager to see the
results from
On 12/11/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is high time for a final 4.0 release. The release
candidate has exposed a couple of minor issues, now fixed in the
trunk, and there's nothing stopping us from following up with a 4.0.1
release if anything else turns up.
On 12/12/05, Cliff Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Participation has different forms not only patches. I use several open
source products. I provided patches as I see it. Providing patches is the
high level participation and not every user can be at that level. Do you
mean Shut up if no patches
On 12/12/05, Cliff Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know whether Tapestry has any quality procedures. While, I followed
up the mail-list quite awhile. My feeling is that Tapestry has no quality
procedures.
I like to hear opinions from the Tapestry inner circle.
Well, I understand and
On 12/1/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howard M. Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non-binding)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 11/27/05, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought I'd take a moment out from packing my house to describe what I'd
like to do in 4.1.
Thanks, that's always interesting to know where the project may be
directed and have a good journey to your new home
Basically, I want to
On 11/22/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Kuhnert has been doing some outstanding work with Tacos
(http://tacos.sf.net), powerful Ajax components for Tapestry.
Further, he's been very active on the mailing lists, providing support
to new users and to Tacos users here and
On 11/13/05, Geoff Longman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW from Eclipse 2.1 to 3.0 the list of breaking changes had 38 items.
However, there were a massive set of changes which one would expect
moving a project from 2.X to 3.0.
By the way I'm all with you and others when talking this way, but
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-692?page=comments#action_12332564
]
Massimo Lusetti commented on TAPESTRY-692:
--
This issue is no more valid since beta11. Viewing a book produce the correct
output.
Thanks
Exception within
On 10/17/05, Mikaël Cluseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, we are working on XUL support for Tapestry (4.0), we'll release
that open-sourced (GPL? LGPL? ASL? BSD?) for sure ;) We hope that it
will help Tapestry in reaching the rich-web-client bright futur ;)
Very interesting to hear. I'll
On 10/4/05, Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts?
It is worth a note or not?
Should i fire a jira issue?
--
Massimo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
2.6.12-1.1378_FC3
java version 1.5.0_04
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_04-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_04-b05, mixed mode, sharing)
JBoss 4.0.2
Tapestry Virtual Library Examples 4.0-beta9
Reporter: Massimo Lusetti
When i try to look at any books
Using 1.5.0_04, the new Virtual Library beta9, jboss 4.0.2 fresh clean
and selecting
ViewBook (for instance ViewBook.external?sp=5066) i got:
Unable to read OGNL expression 'parsed OGNL expression' of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Method isEmpty failed for object
org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils
With and
On 8/28/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm synchronizing from SVN right now; looks 100%.
Does anyone know why there's only one repository for all projects
under svn within the ASF umbrella ?
Do you like the way revisions speed up even in anyone commit to the project ?
Probably
On 8/28/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm synchronizing from SVN right now; looks 100%.
Cool. Get to it with subclipse 0.9.33 and it gets me no problem.
--
Massimo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/24/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Something is flakey either with the CVS repository, or with my
workspace. I've been having wierd check-in problems for the last day
or so. I'm going to re-create my workspace to see if that helps.
Does the switch over to subversion has
On 7/29/05, Geoff Longman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Listen, I know this is OSS and not a shop with hard
deadlines/requirements/deliverables. The point is that many users
*are* working in shops with hard deadlines/requirements/deliverables.
I field questions and sometimes less than favorable
On 6/26/05, Howard Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to do this sooner, since it will make
creating a 4.1 development branch much easier.
That's a big point. If you wish to start using branches for
development i strongly suggest you to move to subversion, the
On 5/23/05, Paul Ferraro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My how time flies... My progress with validation improvements has
admittedly been very slow over the last few months as I have been very
swamped with work. My schedule will be lightening up this week - and I
expect to be able to devote all
Italian ValidationStrings
-
Key: TAPESTRY-327
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-327
Project: Tapestry
Type: Improvement
Components: Framework
Versions: 4.0
Reporter: Massimo Lusetti
Priority: Minor
I like the idea of naming a software release (version) but i would
make it go together with a version/revision number.
I don't like the idea of having only Tapestry Picasso but something
like Tapestry 3.1 (Picasso) could be good.
Just my .02 euro not minding to any
--
Massimo
46 matches
Mail list logo
