Re: Sugg: Import utility in plugin (was:Re: 1.54 Beta/40)

2002-02-20 Thread Marek Mikus
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Alexis Haeringer wrote: [+] Import messages from Nescape 6 [+] Import of Outlook Express folder structure [+] Import messages from MS Outlook Thx, but I don't understand why IMPORT UTILITY are EMBEDDED This utility are use only 1 time (and not always !).

Re: Beta 41 - NT FIX.. OK!

2002-02-20 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hi Graham, On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, at 22:35:07 [GMT +] (which was 0:35 where I live) in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I've changed something and Do tell.. In Beta/40, the bas was loading a DLL for NTML (MSN) authentication at startup. The DLL file name is secur32.dll. Under NT4,

Re[2]: Beta 41 - NT FIX.. OK!

2002-02-20 Thread Robert van der Hulst
Maxim, Thank you very much for the good news! Did anyone estimate the speed difference between the recent beta, Beta/39 and 1.53, for example? The difference should be noticeable when entering large folders, with five thousand messages or more. On network drives, the difference

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Alain de Gevigney
Hello Marck, On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 10:28:58 [GMT +] (which was 11:28 where I live) you wrote: MDP Hi TBBETA, your signatur seems not to be valid here! :-/ MDP Only when using the MS CryptoAPI. It's okay with the built-in S/MIME MDP support. It work if you import British

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Patrick Cornelien
Hello Alain de Gevigney, On Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 at 12:00, you wrote: It work if you import British Telecommunications plc in your intermediary authority certificates. But it is AFAIK possible to include the BT certificates. This would be a better way, so everybody could verify your

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBBETA, On 20 February 2002 at 12:00:48 +0100 (which was 11:00 where I live) Alain de Gevigney wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Only when using the MS CryptoAPI. It's okay with the built-in MDP S/MIME support.

Re: Sugg: different signed glyph (was:Re: 1.54 Beta/40)

2002-02-20 Thread Patrick Cornelien
Hello Alexis Haeringer, On Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 at 09:53, you wrote: I think that a different signed glyph could be more _coherent_, because for the moment icon signature is like a valid signature ! because This glyph however is not related to the actual signature validity I agree

Re: 1.54 Beta/40

2002-02-20 Thread Miles Alexander
Hello Stefan, Historians believe that on Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 12:07:05 PM, was when, Stefan typed the following: ST Dear All, ST The Bat! 1.54 Beta/40 can be downloaded from ST http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html ST Direct download URL is ST

Re: Please send us new GLYPH (was:Re: 1.54 Beta/40)

2002-02-20 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Alexis Haeringer wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Could you please send us the new glyph.bmp. the feature makes use of an image that is already part of the regular glyph.bmp. If your glyphs aren't up-to-date I suggest installing the latest release version of the Bat! and replacing the

Re: 1.54 Beta/40

2002-02-20 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Miles Alexander wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Is there anyone that has been keeping a running record of enhancements/changes/fixes along the 1.54 Beta path? Günther Eisele kept track (currently up to beta 38): http://www.guenther-eisele.de/bat/154-new.txt Regards,

Re[2]: 1.54 Beta/40

2002-02-20 Thread Miles Alexander
Hello Markus, Historians believe that on Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 6:54:00 AM, was when, Markus typed the following: MG Hi, MG Miles Alexander wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Is there anyone that has been keeping a running record of enhancements/changes/fixes along

Re: 1.54 Beta/40

2002-02-20 Thread Michael Stepuchev
Hello, Stefan. Sometimes, 19.02.2002, 22:07, you wrote me about 1.54 Beta/40: ST [-] Scroll bars are again proportional, they were broken in Beta/11. Not confirmed. Horizontal scrollbars are not proportional. -- See you later, Michael Stepuchev, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat!

Re: 1.54 Beta/40

2002-02-20 Thread Marek Mikus
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Michael Stepuchev wrote: Hello, Stefan. Sometimes, 19.02.2002, 22:07, you wrote me about 1.54 Beta/40: ST [-] Scroll bars are again proportional, they were broken in Beta/11. Not confirmed. Horizontal scrollbars are not proportional. Maxim's answer in bugtraq: The

Re: Wish : Mail Ticker

2002-02-20 Thread Alexis Haeringer
Bonjour Philippe, Mardi, le 19 février 2002 à 09h43 [GMT +0100] (ce qui correspond à 09h43 ici où j'habite), Philippe Gouillou =[PG] a écrit à [EMAIL PROTECTED] : WISH : I'd like to have at least one of these features : For me, I think it's could be very interessant to have an option in

Re: B/40 : Menu Navigator back

2002-02-20 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Lars. At 5:13 PM on Tuesday, February 19, 2002 you wrote the following about B/40 : Menu Navigator back: PG The menu navigator is now visible under XP with PG normal fonts and theme. Lars Not here, at least not always. Sometimes it's Lars hidden, sometimes it's not. :-( But that is one

Re: Problems with B40 and B41

2002-02-20 Thread Neal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Beta-testers, I found some strange features in TheBat Beta40 and Beta41. Beta40: Doesn't run under NT4 (??!!). It generates application error :( (I tried it on 3 different machinesI'll try it at home under W2k at night :) ). Beta41: Extremly high