Hi All,
Version 3.0.1.33 works OK, the same as 3.0.1.26 did, for me.
But still nothing in Add\Remove programs list. Not serious for me but
_should_ be fixed before Ritlabs try to issue a fully functional
download of the final version of the current series.
--
Best regards,
Roger
On Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at 10:30:40 PM, Stefan wrote:
The (infamous) Help already explains:
...everything but where to find the NOD32 Plugin, or am I missing something
in the help file about there to find that Plugin?
--
-=Nick Andriash=-
-=Creston, B.C. Canada=-
The
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:36:26 -0700GMT Michael L. Wilson wrote:
Does anyone want the the nod32 plugin .1? I found it on a web search.
me, could you please post the url?
--
Regards,
Feli
The Bat! 3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
BayesIt! 0.7.3
Hello Ian,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 01:27:40, you wrote:
Is there a difference between the Home and Professional executables in
the rar distribution files?
The Home and Professional executables are the same, it is the registration key and the
installation package that make the difference.
Hello Tbbeta,
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new version announcement
within a few hours.
--
Best
Hello Martin,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 10:38:24, you wrote:
Well not a big problem - but I had to reopen:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2456
Thank you, we will fix this bug afterwards (after this release).
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL
Hello Bill,
You failed to include the new help file :-( I've been
watching each of the RAR files released - it has never
been included.
As far as I know, RAR files never include anything but the thebat.exe
file.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, at 10:26:51 [UTC+0300] (Wednesday,
October 13, 2004 09:26 my local time) Maxim Masiutin wrote:
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
Both wrapped and non-wrapped 3.0.1.33 versions start and exit smoothly
on Windows 95. However, I don't have ant TB track in
Maxim,
On 13-10-2004 09:26, you [MM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MM If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new
MM version announcement within a few hours.
Could you elaborate on what the size descriptions in the MSI installer
are supposed to stand for?
Mine said Help
Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] Martin,
MS Well not a big problem - but I had to reopen:
MS https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2456
It must be OK in .33 - please check it.
--
All the Best!
Stefan
A dirty book is seldom dusty.
pgpN7t5TCh053.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 10:03:21 AM, you wrote:
MS Well not a big problem - but I had to reopen:
MS https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2456
ST It must be OK in .33 - please check it.
Not fixed...
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2456
Please also check very annoying bug
Hi Maxim,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, at 10:26:51 [GMT +0300] (which was 9:26 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Wrapped .33'
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RO In the main screen:
RO Tools - Open PGP - Choose Open PGP version -
RO This will cause an error about no valid entrypoint or something like
Curiously enough, it didn't complain at all.
RO that, but simply ignore that and pick 'PGP 5,6,7,8
Hi Martin,
MS No, not fixed - please read added note to bugreport - problem when
MS using quick templates.
Sorry, I should have checked the BT before. It's fixed now, but it's a
subject of the new Beta series. :-)
--
Regards,
Stefan
If love is blind, lingerie makes great braille.
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 09:11, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
The Home and Professional executables are the same, it is the
registration key and the installation package that make the
difference.
Will this be true in the future as well?
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v3.0.1 RC4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ANV Do you have to enter the user\password anywhere when you connect via proxy?
Nope.
- --
:Stuart_Hemming:
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ANV It just returns http answers, like 404 - not found, 403 - forbidden, etc.
ANV HTTP 407 Proxy Authentication Required - The ISA Server
ANV requires authorization to fulfill the request.
Sorry if I'm being dim, but I don't know what you mean; I
Hello TBBETA,
Rumour believes that on 12 October 2004, at 17:55:16 +0100 (which was
17:55 where I live) David Elliott graced us with these comments
advanced warning
Just foung 2 bugs
No I have not.
1) Back up and restore not keeping QT
I got it wrong the the QT was in another account
Maxim Masiutin [MM] wrote,
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new
version announcement within a few
Hi Maxim,
on Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:26:51 +0300GMT, you wrote:
MM We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
Installed without problems and works smoothly as far as I can tell.
There is still no entry in the ARP, but who cares... ;-)
--
Cheers
Peter
The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 98, 4, 10,
Hello Nick,
...everything but where to find the NOD32 Plugin, or am I missing something
in the help file about there to find that Plugin?
http://bat-mail.de.vu/download.html » PlugIns » Anti-Virus PlugIns » NOD 32
[94 KB] http://thebat.orgavision.de/zip/nod32.zip
--
best regards
Miroslav
Hello Maxim!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 2:26 AM, you wrote:
MM We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
...
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
MM If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a
MM new version announcement within a few hours.
Hello Maxim!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 7:00 AM, you wrote:
MB I read a post on tbudl just now that seemed to indicate that the
MB announcement has been made, in which the poster complained that
MB the .com website is still announcing v. 2.0. So, if you have
MB announced, congratulations--I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference
between these 2 products?
- --
:Stuart_Hemming:
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.3
PGP Key available from
shemming,
On 13-10-2004 14:31, you [sec] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sec Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference
sec between these 2 products?
Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change
--
Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 9:26:51 AM, among other things, you wrote:
MM We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
I have just downloaded and installed from this .msi. No problem with
installing, but still no TB
On Wednesday, 13 October 2004 at 13:03 (UK time), Roger Phillips said:
I have just downloaded and installed from this .msi. No problem with
installing, but still no TB entry in my 'Add\Remove programs' list.
It has been pointed out several times on this list that you won't now get
this on
Hello Maxim,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 2:26:51 AM, you wrote:
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
MM If nobody will found any trouble
Maxim Masiutin wrotes on 13/10/2004 at 18:26:51 +1100
subject Wrapped .33 :
Hello Tbbeta,
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
If nobody will found any
Friday, October 08, 2004 6:18 PM Stefan wrote:
Hello All,
The Bat! v3.0.1 RC6 is now available from
https://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
as MSI installations (both Home and Professional)
This release definitely seems less stable than RC5. I have begun to
have odd memory errors and the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PF Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change
That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an extra
$10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it?
- --
:Stuart_Hemming:
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1
Sorry for bringing back this old topic, but I was just wondering if anything is
planned to do about
it. I'm on 3.0.1 RC5 and still can't find an item in the shortcut list for Reply to
all using
selected text.
There are right-click menu saying Reply to all quoting selected text but
we can
Hallo Stuart,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:16:27 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 16:16 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
PF Yes. Still - but things have been promised to change
SH That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an extra
SH $10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it?
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 16:37, Roelof Otten wrote:
SH That's what I though. It's a bit steep asking people to pay an
SH extra $10 for the pleasure of /just/ a name though, isn't it?
Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using
TB for business.
I was about to
Hallo Marcus,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:46:53 +0200GMT (13-10-2004, 16:46 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
MO If this is already stated at the site I apologise, but at least I could
MO not find it at a first look.
Neither could I.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
WinErr: 010 Reserved for future mistakes by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RO Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using
RO TB for business.
Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it?
- --
:Stuart_Hemming:
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt!
Hallo Stuart,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:56:41 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 16:56 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
RO Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using
RO TB for business.
SH Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it?
OK, but the other side is that $10,00 isn't a very
Hello Maxim,
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 you wrote:
Hello Tbbeta,
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_professional.msi
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will
Hello Roelof!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 10:15 AM, you wrote:
RO Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're
RO using TB for business.
SH Obiously, but that wasn't the point, was it?
RO OK, but the other side is that $10,00 isn't a very substantial
RO amount of money,
Hallo shemming,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:31:52 +0100GMT (13-10-2004, 14:31 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
S Am I right in thinking that there's still no practical difference
S between these 2 products?
The reason I bought the professional edition is (extra) security. I am still
waiting..
--
On Wednesday, 13 October 2004 at 16:24 (UK time), Mary Bull said:
I bought the Professional license, not because I plan to use it in
business, but simply because I am actually able to afford it and I
think it may have some features added down the road which I might
wish, in the future, to
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, at 7:58:53 AM, Roelof wrote:
Well, you don't have to go for the pro, unless of course you're using
TB for business.
I don't believe it has anything to do with business or home use, rather the
Pro version is supposed to take the place of the current SecureBat
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:00:35 -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
Another :star: to you and to all your colleagues! Many thanks
for the hard, careful work and quick responses to your beta
testers. :)
Many thanks for what? I think you (as many others on this list)
have lost perspective a bit. RitLabs is
Quoting Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In other words, I saw it as an opportunity to support RitLabs
in the
face of all the bashing the company was taking at the time,
on-line,
in the TB! lists, and in Private Mails to me.
I have to agree with Mary on this. I also consider any email
client
Hello Arjan!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 10:40 AM, you wrote:
AdG It's these people you should say thank you to (IMNSHO of
AdG course).
So, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I have received
is an on-line scolding. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.1.33 (Professional
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:21:14 +0200, Krzysztof Trybowski wrote:
Doesn't install at all.
It installed fine for me, Krzysztof. And, so far, I don't see any
evidence of the annoyances associated with RC6 - the old help files
(though I cannot say if this msi overwrote the others, because I did
Hi MAU,
Tuesday, October 12, 2004
you lifted one eyebrow and looked me very severe into my eyes and
whispered:
Am I understanding you correctly? Are you talking about a 70 MB e-mail
message?
This is correct, but it is no single mail since TB can automatically
split and send on the one end
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Avi,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Avi mused about Wrapped .33 (at least in part):
:pacsnip2a:
AY But I have a different question. I'd like to know why the Windows
AY installer wanted to connect to the Internet when I was installing TB.
AY What was
Hi Maxim Masiutin,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
you let us know -at least in parts- :
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new
version announcement within a few hours.
I know that I am late (running the new major release since two hours),
but finally I can say: let the
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:14:11 -0700, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
Microsoft Software Installer (msi) connects to the internet when it is
used to check for new versions of itself. It is a function of the
MSI, not The Bat! installer.
Thanks for the clarification, Michael. That is good to know.
--
Hello Terry!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 3:45:22 PM you wrote:
This release definitely seems less stable than RC5. I have begun to
have odd memory errors and the occassional AV. Sorry that I can't
point to anything more specific at this time. I know it's not very
helpful. I'll try to
So, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I have
received is an on-line scolding. :)
My, isn't there a lot of bad temper around today, Mary? Must be the
weather or something.
--
Regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 3.0.1.33
Hello Arjan!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 5:40:48 PM you wrote:
I think it is a expletive withheld shame that RitLabs saddles
its loyal-through-thick-and-thin group of Beta testers up which
such an awful mess. It's these people you should say thank you
to (IMNSHO of course).
Well,
Hello Dick,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:03:06 +0200 GMT (13/10/2004, 03:03 +0700 GMT),
Dick wrote:
ZW?On?Monday,?October?11,?2004,?at?20:27:00?[UTC+0200]?(Monday,?October?11,
ZW?2004?20:27?my?local?time)?Dick?wrote:
?Don't?know?if?this?was?introduced?with?RC07?but?the?function?bar
Hello Clive!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 11:49 AM, you wrote:
MB So, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I have
MB received is an on-line scolding. :)
CT My, isn't there a lot of bad temper around today, Mary? Must be the
CT weather or something.
LOL Did you not notice the
LOL Did you not notice the Smiley?
I wasn't referring to you, Mary, as I suspect you know.
I'm allergic to smileys (and those horrible :: things too, I'm afraid)
so that's why I subconsciously blotted out the wretched thing!
--
Regards
Clive Taylor
Using TB 3.0.1.33
Well, we have a bit of time on our hands while we wait for the next
beta to arrive. I am trying to do a good job. How would you rate my
efforts so far? :)
Sorry, Mary, I didn't read the rest of your posting - interrupted by
the household domestic goddess for a dressing down. I think you're
Hello Clive,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CT My, isn't there a lot of bad temper around today, Mary? Must be the
CT weather or something.
As one of the few members on this list who have personally met Mary I
don't think she's capable of a bad tempered thought (but I
Hello Clive!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 12:10 PM, you wrote:
MB lol Did you not notice the Smiley?
CT I wasn't referring to you, Mary, as I suspect you know.
Honestly, I did not. You were posting directly to an exchange between
Arjan and me, and you called me by name in the body of the
As one of the few members on this list who have personally met Mary
I don't think she's capable of a bad tempered thought (but I could
be wrong
My strangled English has obviously given the impression that I was
complaining about Mary. I wasn't. My comments were about other
postings here today;
Hello Clive!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 12:16 PM, you wrote:
CT Sorry, Mary, I didn't read the rest of your posting ...
It's okay. I'm really in a very happy mood. I'll send a PM to you,
since this is getting toward being OT.
And yes, we would very much enjoy reading you on tbot again.
Hello Clive,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CT My strangled English has obviously given the impression that I was
CT complaining about Mary. I wasn't.
Just read your other messages and realise that you weren't complaining
at her.
As for strangled English, if it isn't
Hello Paul,
--On 13. lokakuuta 2004 16:32 +0100 Paul White
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll end up with what is now known as Secure Bat. I wish I
had done the same for just an extra $10.00.
I'm glad that I did buy the Professional licence :-)
Six weeks of bug-fixing has certainly restored
Hello tbbeta,
I posted this when 3.0 first came out, and it was suggested that the
problem might have been fixed. As I have not been downloading and
installing Beta versions, I have been eagerly awaiting the full
release of 3.0.1 to see whether the problem has done away. Sadly,
although 3.0.1 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Peter mused about Question marks (at least in
part):
:pacsnip2a:
TF Is anybody seeing the same? For me the problem with excessive
TF question marks when viewing HTML messages in the PTV or replying to
TF them is
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:26:51 +0300, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new version announcement
within a few hours.
No Halloween edition this year? :-(
Thanks for the hard work though.
--
Kevin
Hello tbbeta,
The Bat 3.0.1 (English) is quite inconsequential in its usage of
... in menu entries to denote a further (modal) dialogue.
For example Options - Preferences lacks these, whereas Message
- Print... has them.
Is there some sort of system I haven't grasped, or is it just
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:53:17 -0500, Mary Bull wrote:
[The Beta! Testers]
It's these people you should say thank you to (IMNSHO
of course).
So, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I
have received is an on-line scolding. :)
Are you a Beta Tester then? Sorry, I haven't noticed
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:55:41 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote:
Stefan, Val and Maxim did thank the beta testers, in the past
and in the current beta cycle.
Yeah, sure, but that doesn't excuse them from the almost daily
dumping of obviously half baked and/or hardly (not?) tested beta
builds on the poor
Hello Arjan!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 8:29:16 PM you wrote:
Gratitude? Thank you for providing me with a torch after leaving
me on my own in the dark and cold depths of your scary Bat!
cave?
Why do you stay with TB if it doesn't meet your needs? Why do you
[potentially insulting
Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing beta cycle.
You have done a terrific job and I really have appreciated working
with you both on and off list.
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, at 20:22:19 [UTC+0200] (Wednesday, October
13, 2004 20:22 my local time) Daniel Vollmer wrote:
The Bat 3.0.1 (English) is quite inconsequential in its usage of
... in menu entries to denote a further (modal) dialogue.
For example Options - Preferences
Hello Krzysztof Kudlacik everyone else
13-Okt-2004 20:02, you wrote:
If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a new version
announcement within a few hours.
NP_macro - 'now playing' does'nt work. Eighter under W2k or WninXP.
Thats most likely not a TB! native macro, is it? :)
Hello Maxim,
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 9:26:51 AM Maxim [MM] wrote:
MM We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
[...]
MM If nobody will found any trouble with it, we will make a
MM new version announcement within a few hours.
At least no trouble with installation.
MSI shows wrong
Hello Michael,
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 at 7:36:26 AM Michael [MLW] wrote:
MLW Does anyone want the the nod32 plugin .1? I found it on a web search.
Definitely yes, and if it's only for testing if I really want to use
it :-)
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
(The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows
Hello Arjan de Groot everyone else
13-Okt-2004 20:29, you wrote:
Yeah, sure, but that doesn't excuse them from the almost daily dumping of
obviously half baked and/or hardly (not?) tested beta builds on the poor
heads of their honorary testing crew. It now surely looks like RitLabs
leaves
Hello Arjan!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 1:29 PM, you wrote:
ADJIt's these people you should say thank you to (IMNSHO
ADJof course).
MBSo, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I
MBhave received is an on-line scolding. :)
AdG Are you a Beta Tester then? Sorry, I haven't noticed
Hello Charlene,
you lifted one eyebrow and looked me very severe into my eyes and
whispered:
No, I didn't do that. ;-)
I just _typed_ or _wrote_:
Am I understanding you correctly? Are you talking about a 70 MB e-mail
message?
And you replied:
This is correct, but it is no single mail
Hi Marcus Ohlström,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
you gave a big hand to the efficient programmers by typing:
Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing
On Wed 13-Oct-04 2:18pm -0400, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing beta cycle.
You have done a terrific job and I really
Hello Arjan,
Yeah, sure, but that doesn't excuse them from the almost daily
dumping of obviously half baked and/or hardly (not?) tested beta
builds on the poor heads of their honorary testing crew. It now
surely looks like RitLabs leaves all the dirty work to them.
Please don't complain on
Hello Zygmunt,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 21:19:26, you wrote:
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, at 20:22:19 [UTC+0200] (Wednesday, October
13, 2004 20:22 my local time) Daniel Vollmer wrote:
The Bat 3.0.1 (English) is quite inconsequential in its usage of
... in menu entries to denote
Hello Krzysztof,
NP_macro - 'now playing' does'nt work. Eighter under W2k or WninXP.
See below my signature. I use %WINAMPTITLE though.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4
Winamp Playing: Fattburger - Monica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Arjan,
On 13 October 2004 at 20:29:16GMT +0200 (which was 19:29 where I live)
Arjan de Groot wrote and made these points on the subject of Wrapped
.33:
AdG Yeah, sure, but that doesn't excuse them from the almost daily
AdG dumping of obviously
Hello Marcus,
Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing beta cycle.
You have done a terrific job and I really have appreciated working
with you both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander,
On 13 October 2004 at 21:34:30GMT +0200 (which was 20:34 where I live)
Alexander S. Kunz wrote and made these points on the subject of
Wrapped .33:
ASK Oh please, will you go troll yourself? Thanks.
LOL I loved that expression!
Marcus,
I agree with everything you said.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.0.1.33 /thebat version
os Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1/os
Current beta is 3.0.1.33 RC/10 | 'Using
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 2:40 PM, you wrote:
M A 70MB email! Oh dear!
I am sending you a star for common-sense, Miguel, even though I
cherish Charlene's meticulous testing and her dedication.
In fact, I offer you 2 stars--no 5 stars--for all your marvelous
testing
Hello Krzysztof,
NP_macro - 'now playing' does'nt work. Eighter under W2k or WninXP.
which macro do you use?
Try the 'Universal NP' by Stanislav V. Mikov - following player are
supported: WinAMP, Foobar2000, Quintessential Player, 1by1, Apollo, and
System Tray Player.
There are no problems
Julian,
On 13-10-2004 19:22, you [JBL] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JBL The problem is that whenever my filter for TBBETA is activated by
JBL an incoming TBBETA message, the focus of TB jumps from whatever
JBL message I was looking at to the first first message in the Inbox of
JBL the JBLists
Quoting Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Arjan!
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 1:29 PM, you wrote:
ADJIt's these people you should say thank you to (IMNSHO
ADJof course).
MBSo, I'm waiting for your thank-you to me. So far, all I
MBhave received is an on-line scolding. :)
AdG Are you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello MAU,
On 13 October 2004 at 21:40:32GMT +0200 (which was 20:40 where I live)
MAU wrote and made these points on the subject of fix for the panel
bug:
M I'd kill anyone who sent me a 70MB email, whether multi-part or not. I
M have my own server
Hæ!
Total agreement. And I have just ordered my v3 Pro license.
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.1.33
| PopFile v0.22.0
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
+-+
| Get Firefox - Take back the web!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 3:18 PM, you wrote:
MO Although some list members obviously does not think it is appropriate,
MO I would like to take this opportunity to thank the programmers at
MO Ritlabs for a good, productive bug-squashing beta
Hello tbbeta,
I've noticed a strange behavior if the Header filed parameter of
NFS.
Let us say, I have a message with To: field set to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and CC: field set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now
I'm going to filter this message with the following condition:
Header field To does
Cheers Mary,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 14:34:51, you wrote:
MB Did you mean that sarcastically? I am very sensitive about it, since
MB I've only been doing it since v. 3.0. That was only because someone on
MB tbudl challenged me to come on here and help test filters.
Ah well. Mary, please
Hello Dennis,
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DH I'll say no more about this matter except to offer my respect to
DH both the developers and testers for what they've accomplished to
DH date.
Amen to that and I've just added an address to my kill filter.
--
Regards,
Hi MAU,
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
you made me smile when just_typing_or_writing:
I'd kill anyone who sent me a 70MB email, whether multi-part or not. I
have my own server for most accounts I use, with no limitation on
mailbox sizes, but I'd kill him anyway.
People are different, and a
Hendrik Oesterlin wrotes on 14/10/2004 at 00:38:44 +1100
subject Wrapped .33 :
Maxim Masiutin wrotes on 13/10/2004 at 18:26:51 +1100
subject Wrapped .33 :
Hello Tbbeta,
We've just wrapped the .33 with the MSI:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/thebat_home.msi
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 22:20, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
This is mine:
TB! Message Filter
beginFilter
UID: [4A87F17A.01C4A636.7BCF2732.0CDA0FFF]
Name: alt.music.rush
Filter: {\0D\0A\20`5`0`X-MyGate-MID:\20alt.music.rush:\0D\0A}
MoveMessage AutoFolder folder alt.music.rush
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
