Hello Avi!
On Monday, November 15, 2004 at 1:36:38 AM you wrote:
You send an encrypted message, but on the other end someone - even
someone you trust - could decrypt the message and leave it lying
around in decrypted form.
Which brings us back to TB and its handling of encrypted messages.
Hello Peter,
Friday, November 12, 2004, 17:56:59, you wrote:
I had no problem installing the new version. The restoring from a tbk
file worked very well, as far as I can see. I had yet to uninstall it,
because I hadn't chosen the correct mail directory during the first
install, and I didn't find
Hello Mark,
Friday, November 12, 2004, 22:17:45, you wrote:
And what happens with a Network setup that shares one messagebase? I suppose
your instructions apply to both (or more) setups?
Networking mode or shared message bases are not applicable to the OTFE.
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
G'day TBBETA,
Notice my tag line which is obtained from a text file in the
root of the mail base directory. The file is linked to SmartBat
so I can add extra cookies.
Is this meant to happen?
I also noticed that other text files linked to SmartBat are
Hello Marcus,
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 9:48:05 PM, among other things, you wrote:
Why not try to contact 9Val direct?
MO 9val has been very responsive and probably would respond to a direct
MO inquiry about this as well, but I do not want to take advantage of his
MO responsiveness.
Hello Dierk!
On Monday, November 15, 2004, 2:03 AM, you wrote:
AY You send an encrypted message, but on the other end someone - even
AY someone you trust - could decrypt the message and leave it lying
AY around in decrypted form.
DH Which brings us back to TB and its handling of encrypted
Hello Roger!
On Monday, November 15, 2004, 9:41 AM, you wrote:
RP have visited https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2041 and added
RP my note, including the suggestion of Dierk. As there are so many
RP notes already, hopefully it will get attended to before very long.
I've just been back--had
Hello Dierk,
PMFJI.
On Saturday, November 13, 2004 at 9:33:17 AM Dierk [DH] wrote:
Just like that? Just by wishing? You have absolutely no right to
privacy or their desires must come with a good reason to demand your
key?
DH The good reason is called anti-terrorism, or save out
Hello Peter!
On Monday, November 15, 2004, 10:22 AM, you wrote:
GF Just like that? Just by wishing? You have absolutely no right to
GF privacy or their desires must come with a good reason to demand
GF your key?
DH The good reason is called anti-terrorism, or save out
DH children.
PP Any more
Hi Roger,
Recently, messages which have been moved automatically to the Junk
folder have started to always display as Unread, even though the
setting in Options/preferences/Warnings/Anti-spam is still set to
mark them as 'Read'. This is not serious, but IS an annoyance.
I
Hello Peter!
On Monday, November 15, 2004 at 5:22:33 PM you wrote:
Seems I'm not well informed enough on this topic, because at least
German laws allow you to don't say anything if you're a suspicious, so
you wouldn't even have to tell your password/passphrase.
Two things, one - before my
Hello ,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
aA Could you send me a link (here or directly)?
aA I'm interested.
'tis done.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4055
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.0.2.7 SpamPal
| Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2
|
Hi, Richard.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4055
Thanks.
Why is every language installed even though I only selected French and
English?
I only have the normal TB! version.
You have selected French and English options for Spell Checker
Dictionaries :)
There is All or nothing option
Hello Ivan,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I It's a hard way to make special French and English language file
I (TheBat.LNG). You need compiler and sources to make your own
I TheBat.LNG.
Way beyond my humble means unfortunately. Can just make computers work
(oh and I did
Hi all,
I first noticed this problem in 3.0.2.1, and posted my findings here.
There was no response and the problem hasn't been fixed, so I'll try
again. I like the idea of peer review before opening a BT item, but
when I don't get any should I just open a BT report? Anyway...
For want of a
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 12:31:16 [UTC-0800] (Monday, November 15,
2004 21:31 my local time) George Mitchell wrote:
I first noticed this problem in 3.0.2.1, and posted my findings here.
There was no response and the problem hasn't been fixed, so I'll try
again. I like the idea of peer
Just a few hours ago, George Mitchell stated I like the idea of peer
review before opening a BT item before re-posting one of his issue. As
do I, therefore I will do a second and last try before submitting this
to the BT. Is there really no one out there who knows the RFCs well
enough to answer?
Zygmunt Wereszczynski wrote:
ZW Cannot confirm common filters behaviour which was described in
ZW your message. I created two pairs of filters according to your
ZW description and have both working exactly as they were set. Here
ZW are my common filters:
snip
ZW Filters for specific account
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 14:14:03 [UTC-0800] (Monday, November 15,
2004 23:14 my local time) George Mitchell wrote:
[...] I pasted your filters into my common read
filters, changed the sounds, assigned a hotkey and shared them with
all my accounts. The behavior is identical to what I
On Monday, November 15, 2004, at 23:09:39 [UTC+0100] (Monday, November 15,
2004 23:09 my local time) Marcus Ohlstrm wrote:
If you unpack and open the attached message in Notepad, you will see it
ends with the word HOME on a separate line. If you open it in TB!, the
last line is truncated to
Hello Marcus,
Monday, November 15, 2004, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote:
MO If you unpack and open the attached message in Notepad, you will see it
MO ends with the word HOME on a separate line.
Sorry, I never see HOME. Not in NoteTab Pro, NotePad, Metapad, nor Edxor.
In hex view, I see there are two
Hello Marcus,
Monday, November 15, 2004, 11:09:39 PM, you wrote:
MO If I open it with Notepad, place the cursor at the last position, hit
MO enter and then save the file, I can open it or import it in to TB!
MO without loosing the trailing ME.
Now that I did it the right way, I can confirm what
George Mitchell wrote:
I first noticed this problem in 3.0.2.1, and posted my findings here.
There was no response and the problem hasn't been fixed, so I'll try
again. I like the idea of peer review before opening a BT item, but
when I don't get any should I just open a BT report? Anyway...
Hello George,
I first noticed this problem in 3.0.2.1, and posted my findings here.
There was no response and the problem hasn't been fixed, so I'll try
again. I like the idea of peer review before opening a BT item, but
when I don't get any should I just open a BT report? Anyway...
For
MAU wrote:
M Maybe it is related to this BT report:
M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
Indeed, that would explain it. Pretty serious bug IMO.
--
George
Using The Bat! 3.0.2.7 on Windows XP Pro 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Z Is this meant to happen?
It's not happening here. My cookie file is in
D:\Program Files\TheBat!\MailPwd and as you can see below all is
well.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by
26 matches
Mail list logo
