Re[2]: TB 3.73 Unable to send 6mB attachment

2006-05-01 Thread NetVicious
viernes, 28 abr 2006 at 21:28, it seems you wrote: > I didn't mean your 6MB attachment, I meant the >100MB attachment that > Netvicious wrote about. Yes, I know. I did it as extreme test for confirm the bug if it was true. The mail was not sent to internet, in cancelled the sending in my loc

Re: TheBat and Voyager updates

2006-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Mon, 1 May 2006 10:48:40 -0400 GMT (01/05/2006, 21:48 +0700 GMT), Paul Van Noord wrote: >>> An additional version number in the file number (like with the main >>> program) would be appreciated. ND>> Seconded. PVN> Me too! I hope the Ritlabs people read here and we don't need to

Re: TheBat and Voyager updates

2006-05-01 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Mon, 1 May 2006, at 10:48:40 [GMT -0400] (which was 16:48 where I live) Paul Van Noord wrote: >>> An additional version number in the file number (like with the main >>> program) would be appreciated. ND>> Seconded. > Me too! I just downloaded voyager from the Ritlabs website and installed i

Re[2]: TheBat and Voyager updates

2006-05-01 Thread Paul Van Noord
5/1/2006 10:48 AM Hi Nick, On 5/1/2006 Nick Danger wrote: >> An additional version number in the file number (like with the main >> program) would be appreciated. ND> Seconded. Me too! -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.72.03 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE Opera 8.5 ___

Re: Subject empty when replying to a JIS message

2006-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 19:40:00 +0200 GMT (01/05/2006, 00:40 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> I think this may have to do with the oddity that your Content-Type ASK> header contains linefeeds and mine doesn't: ASK> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP ASK> Conte

Re: TheBat and Voyager updates

2006-05-01 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 05/01/2006, @ 20:35:04 (8:35 AM Locally) ~~~ Hello Thomas, > I would certainly like an indication of the version number on the > download website. Yep, I did the same hunt this morning myself. > An additional vers

Re: Deferred sending setting

2006-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ian, On Mon, 1 May 2006 19:40:49 +1000 GMT (01/05/2006, 16:40 +0700 GMT), Ian A. White wrote: M>> Try setting 'Confirm immediate sending' in Account/Properties/Options M>> and see if that works better for you. IAW> Thanks for that. I kept looking for something and for the life of me I IAW>

Re: TheBat and Voyager updates

2006-05-01 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Martin, On Mon, 1 May 2006 11:38:19 +0200 GMT (01/05/2006, 16:38 +0700 GMT), Martin Schoch wrote: MS> TheBat version is 3.80.03 MS> Voyager version is 3.72.03 MS> Any explanation for this difference? They may have to get around to it. I, too, am at the moment downloading the Voyager for

Re: PGP 9 and TheBat

2006-05-01 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hello Charlene, Sunday, April 30, 2006, 11:33:24 PM, you wrote: > Hi Vilius Šumskas, > Sunday, April 30, 2006 > you let us know -possibly edited- : >> The Bat! don't have source open. So we must not trust them then right? > TB isn't a privacy enhancement company ;) Ok, we should not trust TB'

Re: Deferred sending setting

2006-05-01 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Ian, Monday, May 1, 2006, 2:34:46 AM, you wrote: IAW> Maybe I have done something wrong, but after a case of "premature IAW> sending", I decided to set the account so that sending was deferred. I IAW> would have thought that doing this would have meant that ALL sending IAW> from the account

Re: Deferred sending setting

2006-05-01 Thread MAU
Hello Ian, > As it stands, there is little use in this feature as I have found it to > work. Any thoughts? Try setting 'Confirm immediate sending' in Account/Properties/Options and see if that works better for you. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.80.03

TBBETA Mission Statement

2006-05-01 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Beta Listers, This is your monthly message from the moderation team to remind you of the primary purpose of this discussion list. To review the list rules, follow the link at the end of this message. Before posting a question to the list,