Re: 4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2008-03-28 · 10:42 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! The Bat! 4.0.18.7 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40187.rar Up and running … Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! QA mailto:[EMAIL

4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
The Bat! 4.0.18.7 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40187.rar What's new in 4.0.18.7 since 4.0.18.6: [-] (#0006878) When an address group was deleted with items belgoning to that group only, its last item was always deleted [-] Find for lost folders in OTFE

Re: 4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, March 28, 2008, Maxim Masiutin wrote: The Bat! 4.0.18.7 is available at [-] (#0006964) Bug with saving multiple attachments (introduced in 4.0.18.6) confirm as fixed, thanks! -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat!

Re: 4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hi Maxim, The Bat! 4.0.18.7 is available at a color-button in picture viewer? -- Best whishes Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu Current beta is 4.0.18.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: 4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2008-03-28 · 10:42 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! The Bat! 4.0.18.7 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40187.rar What's new in 4.0.18.7 since 4.0.18.6: Of course, this one was fixed, too! :-) [-] (#0006927) [MicroEd editor] Automatic

Re: 4.0.18.7

2008-03-28 Thread Martin Sebald
Hi Maxim, up and running with OTFE and Windows Server 2008. ;-) -- Regards, Martin The Bat! v4.0.18.7 powered by Windows Server Longhorn Server 4.0 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 ConCarne cooks best since 1998 http://www.concarne.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Justify on wrap broken? (was: 4.0.18.7)

2008-03-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2008-03-28 · 12:32 h (CET)] What's new in 4.0.18.7 since 4.0.18.6: Of course, this one was fixed, too! :-) [-] (#0006927) [MicroEd editor] Automatic wrapping does not work properly, if a word ends exactly with line ending With the above mentioned bug I

Re[2]: PTV bug

2008-03-28 Thread Kertész Vilmos
Hello Roger, Pressing down arrow does nothing here! KV Because you are using the Windows editor. We are talking about KV MicroEd (check yesterday's mail in the thread). I am *not* using the Windows editor and have never used it. Please see the attached 'Message editor bar.jpg' file. V Hmm...

File associations on every startup when is user logged as Power user and not Administrator

2008-03-28 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, additional users are reporting me this problem, it is reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6956, please confirm if You can. Thanks -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.18.7 under Windows XP 5.1 Build

Re: Justify on wrap broken?

2008-03-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2008-03-28 · 12:52 h (CET)] […] I came across a problem with the Justify on wrap option in Options|Preferences…|Viewer/Editor|Editor Prefs. If this option is enabled, lines should be automatically justified after automatic wrapping. Is that correct? If yes,

Re: PTV bug

2008-03-28 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Kertész, Friday, March 28, 2008, 1:48:24 PM, among other things, you wrote: In this reply it is working normally, but will not go below the bottom line of my signature.(I'm not sure whether this WAD) KV Hmmm... It _always_ go beyond the last line at me using MicroEd. It is KV the

Re[2]: PTV bug

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
In this reply it is working normally, but will not go below the bottom line of my signature.(I'm not sure whether this WAD) KV Hmmm... It _always_ go beyond the last line at me using MicroEd. It is KV the Windows Editor, where it cannot go beyond the last line. (I know, KV you sent a

MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
Don't know if it is new or not: Ctrl+N, new mail Press Ctrl+A Press Del, nothing happens The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the message body. My new message template is very simple: Hello , %Cursor -- Vili -- Vili

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:50:01 -0400 GMT (28/03/2008, 21:50 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Ctrl+N, new mail V Press Ctrl+A V Press Del, nothing happens V The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the V message body. Confirmed. (The cursor is in the To line over

Re[2]: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
V Ctrl+N, new mail V Press Ctrl+A V Press Del, nothing happens V The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the V message body. Confirmed. (The cursor is in the To line over here.) Sorry, at me it is in the To line as well, my mistake. Support it please:

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:39:29 -0400 GMT (28/03/2008, 22:39 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Ctrl+N, new mail V Press Ctrl+A V Press Del, nothing happens V The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the V message body. Confirmed. (The cursor is in the To line over

Re[2]: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
V Ctrl+N, new mail V Press Ctrl+A V Press Del, nothing happens V The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the V message body. Confirmed. (The cursor is in the To line over here.) V Sorry, at me it is in the To line as well, my mistake. V Support it please:

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Vili, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:57:05 -0400 GMT (28/03/2008, 22:57 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V Ctrl+N, new mail V Press Ctrl+A V Press Del, nothing happens V The cursor is in the Subject line (at me), but the Ctrl+A works on the V message body. Confirmed. (The cursor is in the To line over

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, March 28, 2008, Vili wrote: No. I made a mistake, refreshed a page and that submitted the bugreport twice. I asked Marek in PM to take care of that duplicate, that he did in like a half a min, maybe before my PM :) So, in short, it is NOT yet fixed. it is now fixed by

Re[2]: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
No. I made a mistake, refreshed a page and that submitted the bugreport twice. I asked Marek in PM to take care of that duplicate, that he did in like a half a min, maybe before my PM :) So, in short, it is NOT yet fixed. it is now fixed by Stef :-) Yes, I saw that, it was fast :) -- Vili

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2008-03-28 · 17:34 h (CET)] So, in short, it is NOT yet fixed. it is now fixed by Stef :-) What do I have to do to get my bugs fixed as fast as this one? ;-) Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! QA mailto:[EMAIL

Re: MicroEd bug

2008-03-28 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, March 28, 2008, Volker Ahrendt wrote: it is now fixed by Stef :-) What do I have to do to get my bugs fixed as fast as this one? ;-) do not know, they are probably not easy and fast to fix as the last one... -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat!

Filter bug(?)

2008-03-28 Thread Vili
I am not sure, and cannot always reproduce, but I never saw it before: I have a self-developed program that shows me the incoming mails' sender and subject (different colors for different accounts). It is triggered by an Any message filter and the message is passed to it. So far it

Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp

2008-03-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Maxim, on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:51:40 +0200GMT (26.03.2008, 10:51 +0100GMT here), you wrote: MM You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. 4.0.18.7: It still connects to the time server but the result is not displayed in the signature. -- Cheers Peter The

Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp

2008-03-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:32 +0100 GMT (29/03/2008, 00:57 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: MM You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM 4.0.18.7: It still connects to the time server but the result is not PM displayed in the signature. No? I

Re: Digitally Signed Timestamp

2008-03-28 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:18:08 +0700GMT (28.03.2008, 19:18 +0100GMT here), you wrote: TF On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:32 +0100 GMT (29/03/2008, 00:57 +0700 GMT), TF Peter Meyns wrote: MM You can put a digitally signed timestamp with The Bat! 4.0.18.6 or later. PM 4.0.18.7: It still

tb 4.0.18.7 beta: Moving messages

2008-03-28 Thread Wolffe
I remember this being reported in a previous beta and it persists still. When moving large numbers of messages between folders window the Moving Messages status window will pop up. The middle is in a transparent state, showing the window behind it. The progress bar will advance a few clicks the