Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Tony! On Thursday, February 21, 2002 at 11:16:31 AM you wrote: The way I see it is, if my signature is valid, which it is, then it should show that way regardless of anything the recipient does or needs to do. I thought that was the whole idea of a digital signature I have

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-21 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Marck D Pearlstone wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : I did / have and Tony's signatures are still invalid when using MS CryptoAPI but valid using internal. Why? When you use MS CryptoAPI IE's certificate storage is being used to validate signatures. Perhaps something is wrong with the

Certificates internal vs MS Crypto API (was: Beta 40 - Don't download!!)

2002-02-21 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, I, Markus Gloede wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : When you use MS CryptoAPI IE's certificate storage is being used to validate signatures. Perhaps something is wrong with the certificates in that storage? Proably BT's certificate is missing. Bingo, I imported the BT certificate into

Re: Certificates internal vs MS Crypto API (was: Beta 40 - Don't download!!)

2002-02-21 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, now comes the funny part. In msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I had set the S/MIME options to use MS CrAPI. I wasn't prompted for a passphrase and the message went out. Now this message show invalid with the Bat's S/MIME API. Guess I have to check my own cert storage now. Regards, Markus -- For

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBBETA, On 21 February 2002 at 11:43:42 +0100 (which was 10:43 where I live) Markus Gloede wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I did / have and Tony's signatures are still invalid when using MS CryptoAPI but valid using internal.

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-21 Thread Tony Boom
This message: 21/02/2002 10:00 GMT. Hello Marck, A reminder of what Marck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: 21 February 2002 at 09:34:19 GMT + MDP I did / have and Tony's signatures are still invalid when using MS MDP CryptoAPI but valid using internal. Why? Good question! The

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Alain de Gevigney
Hello Marck, On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 at 10:28:58 [GMT +] (which was 11:28 where I live) you wrote: MDP Hi TBBETA, your signatur seems not to be valid here! :-/ MDP Only when using the MS CryptoAPI. It's okay with the built-in S/MIME MDP support. It work if you import British

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Patrick Cornelien
Hello Alain de Gevigney, On Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2002 at 12:00, you wrote: It work if you import British Telecommunications plc in your intermediary authority certificates. But it is AFAIK possible to include the BT certificates. This would be a better way, so everybody could verify your

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBBETA, On 20 February 2002 at 12:00:48 +0100 (which was 11:00 where I live) Alain de Gevigney wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Only when using the MS CryptoAPI. It's okay with the built-in MDP S/MIME support.

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Markus Kachel
Hello Graham, On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, You wrote to subject: Beta 40 - Don't download!! Beta 40 - just available in the usual place crashes on startup.. Exception 0x25 at address 077f892e5 Running fine here. No Problem, but fast startup Bye Markus -- Powered with The Bat

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Sam
I downloaded Beta 40 and I have no trouble with crashing on start-up (using WinXP). One problem I have is that the minimize button does not work. I can go from Normal window to Maximized window, but the miminize to task bar does not work at all. -- Have a great day, Sam Wise men speak because

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hi Graham, On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, at 16:50:25 [GMT +] (which was 18:50 where I live) in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Beta 40 - just available in the usual place crashes on startup.. Exception 0x25 at address 077f892e5 Just rolled back... I will try to change something

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, 1:04:36 PM, Sam wrote: I downloaded Beta 40 and I have no trouble with crashing on start-up (using WinXP). One problem I have is that the minimize button does not work. I can go from Normal window to Maximized window, but the miminize to task bar does not

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Dwight, Tuesday, February 19, 2002, 8:14:30 PM, you wrote to TBBETA: (using WinXP). One problem I have is that the minimize button does not work. I can go from Normal window to Maximized window, but the miminize to task bar does not work at all. DAC Not duplicated here on XPh. It

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Michael Teichmann
Hi Graham, Tuesday, February 19, 2002, 16:50:25 GMT + (which was the same day, 17:50:25 local time here), you wrote, using «The Bat!»: Beta 40 - just available in the usual place crashes on startup.. Exception 0x25 at address 077f892e5 Same here. Just rolled back... Same here.

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread ZdroYY
Hello Chris, On 19 lutego 2002, wtorek at 19:19:28 You wrote the following: Apparently a windows nt4 issue?? CW Possibly, but it opens fine under MY copy of NT4 SP6 Not tried to CW see if there is still a Dr Watson error on shutdown yet. well I'm not going to upgrade my NT4 to SP6 but

Re: Beta 40 - Don't download!!

2002-02-19 Thread Graham Foster
Hello Mario Beta 40 - just available in the usual place crashes on startup.. Exception 0x25 at address 077f892e5 same here, Dr. Watson at startup on Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 6 build 1381 Phew - I was beginning to think I'd cried wolf too early. ;-) Beta 40 also works fine for me