Hi Paul,
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
AS editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing
PVN to be bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say
PVN the other
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36:04 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Paul,
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
PVN bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say the other
PVN editors are correct and the TB is wrong. The reverse is also true.
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 3:46:42 PM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
No, that I did not say for sure. What I said is that everybody is used
to a certain way, be it sensible or not. Every departure from this
trained behaviour is new territory for the user, and new territory is
Hi Avi,
(BTW, is this correct? Is Avi your first name?)
Why all the trouble? One-Enter is
end-paragraph-and-goto-next-line, two-Enter is
end-paragraph-and-insert-new-empty-line. The way it's done since
WordStar. Why fumble around with two different key combinations
that just confuse
On 6/24/05, Alto Speckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Avi,
(BTW, is this correct? Is Avi your first name?)
Avi is currently my first name in Israel, but it's very common. So
some people in the computer-related industries call me Jay. Take
your pick... or choose another name, if you like.
5 matches
Mail list logo
