(int,(int,int,char*,int)*,int)
I believe now that TB is looking for TBP_GetStatus and it's finding
TBP_GetStatus(void) and exiting. I think this is Borland's linker
getting in my way... I'll have to play around with the build options
some more.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0
, they are called when the plugin is loaded/unloaded. If you do
ST everything at the DLL entry, you simple should not implement them -
ST their absence is not critical.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
, iSize);
else
DisplaySomeErrorMessageHereAndExit();
why not just
if(0 == TBP_GetName(strDest, iSize));
{
DisplaySomeErrorMessageHereAndExit();
}
-Mark Wieder
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBDEV information:
http://www.silverstones.com
from TBP_Setup() during the plugin load
process then the load is aborted (a DLL_PROCESS_DETACH message is
issued to the plugin), and the plugin never gets to the TBP_GetName()
process.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
rather than deleting them sight
unseen.
What I'd really like for this one is an autoreply that informs the
sender that some people really need to learn how to write better press
releases... g
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
t Again: is this plugin working AFTER or before filtering
Now THAT's an interesting question. When *does* the anti-spam plugin
get called?
Stefan?
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
head?
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBDEV information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
change. After moving to a new project file everything
has been working.
I don't quite know why your DLL has gotten so large, though. I'm well
under 200k with no optimization.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
support for user-defined macros and such, but so far
there hasn't been any API or samples.
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
TBBCCBSpamSample.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
with the DLL for distribution.
I don't have the gcc compiler (or any other) installed at the moment,
so someone else will have to take on that conversion. There's actually
very little that's compiler-specific here - it's mostly a matter of
getting the TBP_EXPORT macro right.
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL
was to write as much simple C, not C++, code as possible
to minimize the chances of having to modify the code for other
compilers (i.e. not using vcl or MFC objects). This is the same
reasoning as above in using a struct instead of a class.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0
.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Alexey-
Thanks for pointing out the critical section stuff. I wasn't aware
that TB! would thread its calls asynchronously that way.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
http
? If
an object is infected with a virus but could not be cured, which of
these codes should I return? What is the difference in the way TB
processes the result codes?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
BTW - many thanks for the API documentation
tpxCookieCount
tpxRegExpText
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
that compiler at hand.
If that's working then this now compiles with Metrowerks Codewarrior,
Borland C++ Builder, and Visual C++.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
TBPluginStub.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
was so the .def file was not necessary -
it works that way in both Borland and Metrowerks compilers. There must
be some combination of compiler directives in VC++ that will produce
the proper name mangling, i.e., give TBP_ExecMacro instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat
as your message text.
The ipc file is checked regularly, IIRC, so it's not a problem having
TB running already. If necessary you can attempt to launch a second
copy of TB and it *should* pass the ipc file to the running copy.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
and wait for it to be gobbled up. Otherwise, yes, what
you're seeing is indeed the opposite of what I would have expected.
Windows is full of surprises.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
...and BTW, before someone jumps on you about
messed up. I don't know how much you're
trying to put into that batch file, but possibly cutting its size down
and running this in multiple passes would help.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
from your website - it reflects badly on me to have sample
code that doesn't compile, and when modified to compile doesn't run.
--
-Mark Wieder
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
)...
--
-Mark Wieder
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
22 matches
Mail list logo
