Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 1:42:26 AM (-5 GMT), Thomas scribbled: Two different things, Allie: your earlier proposal was that the quotes should show the original sender's initial's; what you describe Agent is doing, is giving you the option to choose a fixed set of characters

Re[2]: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Ali, on Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 6:39:07 PM, Ali Martin wrote: Two different things, Allie: your earlier proposal was that the quotes should show the original sender's initial's; what you describe Agent is doing, is giving you the option to choose a fixed set of characters as a quote

IMAP Implementation

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Long
The Bat seems to have inferior IMAP support. The whole point of IMAP is that the mailboxes are stored on the server, so that you see the same mailboxes and messages regardless of what client you use. The problem here is The Bat seems to ignore any message in an IMAP box which is marked "read".

Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Monday, September 27, 1999, 11:42:26 PM, Thomas wrote: And yes, I think it would be nice to be able to change the quote mark from the standard "greater than" to any character or string you like. This would be bad since it would break many other clients. TB, for example, uses that

OT: Re[2]: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "Quote prefixing rehash" From Steve Lamb: SL Allowing the user to choose a quote character SL willy-nilly breaks that de-facto standard across the board. willy-nilly. Now there's an phrase that's just not used often enough in my book! Let's all try to work that into our e-mail

Re[2]: IMAP Implementation

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Long
No you are not understanding what I am saying - it is NOT treating it as a local box, its treating it like POP. If I load Pine on the server and select "INBOX", I see both new AND old messages. When I load up The Bat, I only see new messages (plus old messages downloaded specifically by that

Re: IMAP Implementation

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 9:10:52 AM, Michael wrote: No you are not understanding what I am saying Michael. You just pissed me off in the worst way. - it is NOT treating it as a local box, its treating it like POP. Right. I get this far and about blew up. If you had quoted

Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Ali Martin
Hi all, On Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 10:34:58 AM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled: This would be bad since it would break many other clients. TB, for example, uses that character as a signal to color the quote line differently. Other applications to the same thing. TB also knows that lines

Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 9:34:39 AM, Ali wrote: Ooops. Well, TB! has already broken this de facto standard by including initials etc. Nope, initials are allowed. Generally if you have the quote prefix within the first, uhmmm, I think it is 5 characters it is ok. Funny, this is why I

Re[2]: IMAP Implementation

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Long
Hi Steve, Yes you are right - I skipped over one word you wrote and it changed the whole meaning. I do appologize. From what I had gathered from the email, I thought you meant the only clients that properly do IMAP is The Bat, Pine, and Outlook Express. But in reality we both agree that The

Re: IMAP Implementation

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 9:55:03 AM, Michael wrote: Yes you are right - I skipped over one word you wrote and it changed the whole meaning. I do appologize. From what I had gathered from the email, I thought you meant the only clients that properly do IMAP is The Bat, Pine, and Outlook

Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 11:00:58 AM, Claude wrote: In other words, if it is the char before the first space, as I can live with no spaces in the initials. Yeah, I noticed that as well. Not saying that TB's logic is perfect, mind you, just that it is one example of a program that does

Re: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 10:29:51 AM, Ali wrote: For TB!, it's 20 characters. Is this 5 character limit a de facto standard which TB! could potentially breach when using first names in the quote prefix? Nah, that was more a number I pulled out on the spur of a moment. Each client

Re[2]: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Claude
Hi, all, On 28/09/1999, at 20:44, Steve Lamb (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) took a mike and sang on a blues tempo: SL Yeah, yeah, over reaction is something I excel at at times. *sigh* Really? ;-) -- Best regards, Claude. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought

Re[2]: Quote prefixing rehash

1999-09-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Steve, on Tuesday, September 28, 1999, 11:34:58 PM, Steve Lamb wrote: And yes, I think it would be nice to be able to change the quote mark from the standard "greater than" to any character or string you like. SL This would be bad since it would break many other clients. TB, for SL