I'm surprised the mailing list itself lets attachments go through.
Isn't that kind of odd, and something that ought to be prevented?
(I'm going to be unsubscribing until it is fixed, in any case.)
--
John De Hoog
http://dehoog.org
Current
Attention!
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner
and check all your files right away!
Take care,
John
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 8:42:07 AM, you wrote:
JDH I'm surprised the mailing list itself lets attachments go through.
JDH Isn't that kind of odd, and something that ought to be prevented?
John,
In the past it has been proven useful to be able to send attachments to
the list for analysis
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 03:55, Paul Cartwright wrote:
ok, I forgot to mention, my screen size is 1024 X 768.
now, my ticker info:
top=770
left=1706 ( I changed that to 770, still nada)
width=476
normal width=476
if my screen size is 1024, does left=1706 mean it is way out of
Gerard wrote...
If you feel there is a risk a catching a virus this way I suggest you use
a good virus checker. A virus might arrive in your everyday mail :(
I do have virus checkers on all my machines, but it's still surprising
to get one from a mailing list, where I have no control over who
On 08 November 2002 at 02:36:31
in mid:79720402.20021107203631;certiflexdimension.com
Jonathan wrote:
JA -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA Hash: SHA1
JA On Thursday, November 07, 2002, Gary wrote...
Hello Scott,
AKA John ;)
...
JA No offence, but don't you think the attitude is a
Hello ,
i'm currently evaluationg the bat for our office since we are not
fully satisfied with our current email client (eudora)
i hope that you can help me with my questions:
the situation:
in our office are several users each with an own email account on our
pop server. additionally there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
8-Nov-2002, 05:07 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
mid:23124709843.20021108050737;cix.co.uk said:
TF They appear wrapped when you view them.
RW No they don't and that's why I asked the question.
Can we, as a group, please try to work out what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Keith,
8-Nov-2002, 09:07 Keith Anderson [KA] in
mid:49203029821.20021108090748;offspin.net said:
JA No offence, but don't you think the attitude is a little rude?
I thought it a little rude myself (sorry Gary!) but since no offence
was taken the
Hello Marck,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 10:14:16[GMT +](10:14 where I live) you wrote
in mid:1441023762.20021108101416;silverstones.com :
MDP Now, I view my mail in a folder view (the ticker virtual folder)
MDP using the RTV and incoming messages are always wrapped to the
MDP window width, however
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
7-Nov-2002, 21:45 -0500 (02:45 UK time) Paul Cartwright [PC] in
mid:23236453.20021107214515;pcartwright.com said:
PC sure, I am not afraid:)
Dude! ;-).
PC top=770 0302 left=1706 06aa
PC now, I went to CHANGE it, and it keeps
Hello all,
My AVG did *not* pick up the eicar test file.
(I get the list messages a a digest).
I am worried now.
How do I test whether I am safe?
--
Regards,
Ochrid
_ The Bat! v1.62b7 op Windows XP _
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
7-Nov-2002, 22:13 -0500 (03:13 UK time) Paul Cartwright [PC] in
mid:14508812.20021107221303;pcartwright.com said:
PC ... the ticker is back! WHEW!
Good news! Sorry about the out of place reply telling you what you
already knew. I didn't
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 10:35:41 AM, Ochrid wrote:
O My AVG did *not* pick up the eicar test file.
My AVG did.
O (I get the list messages a a digest).
Does the digest mode discard attachments? Could that be why?
O I am worried now.
O How do I test whether I am safe?
Are you running the
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, November 8, 2002 at 4:25:29 AM you wrote:
Can we just do away with automated replies? They have never been
anything else but a nuisance. Sure you can do a lot with TB, but this
is a feature I'd like to see permanently disabled.
Not completely but it should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:104144150998.20021108103136;cix.co.uk,
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'
RW So the problem is obviously the autowrap setting. Do you mean,
RW by your response, that it doesn't matter what the autowrap
RW settings are if you use the MT and RTV?
Hello Clive!
On Friday, November 8, 2002 at 7:50:15 AM you wrote:
I think Gary's comments are justified.
No. There are list rules concerning tone and Gary's comment was out of
line. Not just because of the rules but because it was plain rude to
comment on a personal level without knowing what
In mid:151207187.20021108065015;ukf.net,
Clive Taylor [CT] wrote:'
CT I didn't know this was the EICAR file because NOD's plugin
CT deletes the attachment and doesn't flag up which virus was
CT attempting to infest this machine when it dumps the message into
CT the quarantine folder. It could
DWAre you running the most recent virus definitions from AVG? When did you
DWlast update? My AVG updates automatically every two days, I just did a
DWmanual download a minute ago there's a new update - so it must be less
DWthan 48 hours since the last one.
Thanks, Deborah, but I do check
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Ochrid wrote:
My AVG did *not* pick up the eicar test file.
(I get the list messages a a digest).
I am worried now.
How do I test whether I am safe?
in digest, You think, messages (one with Eicar) are attached in one MSG
attachment?
This is a problem in The Bat!,
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 9:54:41 AM, you wrote:
JDH I do have virus checkers on all my machines, but it's still surprising
JDH to get one from a mailing list, where I have no control over who the
JDH sender is.
John,
That's life, full of surprises ;-)
--
Best regards,
Gerard
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 1:09:30 AM, you wrote:
MDP It may have ended up in negative-offset-land. The only known repair
MDP for this is to hack the ticker positions in the registry.
MDP If you are confident with doing so, open the registry editor and
MDP find
Hello Allie,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 05:52:23[GMT -0500](10:52 where I live) you wrote
in mid:16534648173.20021108055223;landscreek.net :
ACM The autowrap setting is important for the fixed width viewer and
ACM not the rich text viewer. So if you wish to see messages window
ACM wrapped and have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In mid:Pine.LNX.4.44.0211081210250.10775-10;lucie.gin,
Marek Mikus [MM] wrote:'
MM in digest, You think, messages (one with Eicar) are attached in
MM one MSG attachment?
Yes.
MM This is a problem in The Bat!, not in plugin or AVG. Nested
MM
Hi John,
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 17:54:41 +0900
John De Hoog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you feel there is a risk a catching a virus this way I suggest you
use a good virus checker. A virus might arrive in your everyday mail
:(
I do have virus checkers on all my machines, but it's still
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:47:57 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eicar.com
Why did my PC-Cillin6 with Real-Time Scan enabled not pick it up?
Ask PC-Cillin :-) My AVG w/ TB!-plugin caught it :-)
Seems your scanning ain't this effective as it should be, maybe you want
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi clemens,
8-Nov-2002, 10:20 +0100 (09:20 UK time) clemens schmuck [CS] in
mid:19510078843.20021108102031;geo-byte.at said:
CS i'm currently evaluationg the bat for our office since we are
CS not fully satisfied with our current email client
Peter Palmreuther wrote...
I do have virus checkers on all my machines, but it's still surprising
to get one from a mailing list, where I have no control over who the
sender is.
I'm sorry, I don't get it.
In your daily e-mail you have control over 'who the sender is'??? *WOW*
You're miles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
8-Nov-2002, 10:31 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
mid:104144150998.20021108103136;cix.co.uk said:
MDP What is the circumstance under which folks are *not* getting
MDP the lines wrapped? ...
RW When I saw that you had mentioned Autowrap I
Hello Marck,
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 at 11:58:03[GMT +](11:58 where I live) you wrote
in mid:507250175.20021108115803;silverstones.com :
MDP Anyway, you know what a PITA it is to see messages that are badly
MDP wrapped, so why not have a reminder to wrap yours properly g?
No, my outgoing messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerard,
8-Nov-2002, 12:17 +0100 (11:17 UK time) Gerard [G] in
mid:16213644639.20021108121701;myrealbox.com said:
G Maybe we should just place a small Register file in the help
G file, you know one thet just changes the values for the ticker
G
Attention!
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner
and check all your files right away!
Take care,
John
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
Hi Ochrid,
on Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:35:41 +0100GMT (08.11.02, 11:35 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:152887766.20021108113541;xs4all.nl :
O My AVG did *not* pick up the eicar test file.
O (I get the list messages a a digest).
O I am worried now.
O How do I test whether I am safe?
Try to save the
Hello Jason!
On Friday, November 8, 2002 at 1:17:02 PM you wrote:
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner
and check all your files right away!
OK, your plug-in works fine, it triggers the necessary automatic
Attention!
It seems you have got a virus on your machine!
Please make sure you have the latest update of your virus scanner
and check all your files right away!
Take care,
John
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL information:
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 12:52:57 PM, you wrote:
MDP This will be the case for the first method but will only work on the
MDP second if there is a working practice of CC or BCC to office for
MDP all outgoing messages.
Hi Marck,
It might help to point out that by putting the CC or BCC to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerard,
8-Nov-2002, 13:59 +0100 (12:59 UK time) Gerard [G] in
mid:17919786221.20021108135923;myrealbox.com said:
G It might help to point out that by putting the CC or BCC to
G office... in all new and reply templates this process will me
G
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 11:56:26 AM, John De Hoog wrote:
JDH I know most of the people who are allowed to send mail to me,
JDH especially files. I get files every day from clients with whom I have
JDH a business arrangement. I have filtering rules that let these senders
JDH and files into
Hello Roland!
On Friday, November 8, 2002 at 1:40:40 PM you wrote:
Take care,
John
From shows Roland and it is signed by John?
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 1.62/Beta6 on Windows XP 5.1 2600Service Pack 1
Asking dumb questions is easier than correcting dumb mistakes.
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 5:35 AM, you wrote:
PC ... the ticker is back! WHEW!
MDP Good news! Sorry about the out of place reply telling you what you
MDP already knew. I didn't think it would take a reboot to reset the
MDP registry. Perhaps it's an XP thing whereby it's caching registry
MDP
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 3:35 AM, you wrote:
MO On Friday, November 8, 2002, 03:55, Paul Cartwright wrote:
ok, I forgot to mention, my screen size is 1024 X 768.
now, my ticker info:
top=770
left=1706 ( I changed that to 770, still nada)
width=476
normal width=476
if my screen
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 5:31 AM, you wrote:
PC sure, I am not afraid:)
MDP Dude! ;-).
hey, I've been scrambling hard drive FATs since DOS 2.11 !!
MDP I should have said - shut down TB, edit the settings, load TB. TB
MDP writes its remembered values back to the registry on exit. Just put
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 7:06 AM, you wrote:
MDP Good idea!
G I also have a question, how do you get to negative-offset-land?
G Change back from a higher resolution? Through it really hard with
G your mouse?
that was what happened to me. I changed video drivers, my resolution
went back to
Good afternoon List Members,
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 at 03:41:24 [GMT +0100] John wrote:
It was obviously a mistake. I have been sending it to myself, for
testing purposes and inadvertently sent it to the wrong address.
My apologies to all.
Didn't get anything. Attachment was caught by ISP
Peter wrote:
Try to save the file. My AV program doesn't check mail attachments either,
but it checks everything I save to any disk. I use AVP
I deleted message and attachment straight away, but wondered why
someone else in this group using AVG plus TB plugin reports a
proper reaction by AVG,
Deborah W wrote...
If you have a filter which excludes attachments from all but specified
sources, surely the same filter would exclude attachments from TBUDL, or
any list-member here?
I'm sure you recognise that the people who are allowed to send you files
might send infected files too - but I
Hi Ochrid,
Friday, November 08, 2002, 14:50 +0100 (8:50 AM here) Ochrid [O] in
mid:10212602902.20021108145056;xs4all.nl said to The Bat List:
O So I wondered if I have somehow set something wrong. I have all
O email-scans etc. enabled.
Do you also have (under Options - Virus Protection) the two
this error message came to me today. can somebody interpret it? I of
course did not send spam from me TO me, so what is this?
===8==Original message text===
PC This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
PC A message that you sent could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, November 08, 2002, Deborah W wrote...
O I am worried now. How do I test whether I am safe?
Are you running the most recent virus definitions from AVG? When did
you last update? My AVG updates automatically every two days, I
just did a
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 1:57:45 PM, John De Hoog wrote:
JDH Unfortunately, I don't have a magic filter that excludes attachments
JDH from unknown senders. Is there such a thing?
Well you were the one who said I have filtering rules that let these
senders and files into my computer. :-)
O So I wondered if I have somehow set something wrong. I have all
O email-scans etc. enabled.
RDo you also have (under Options - Virus Protection) the two boxes at
Rthe bottom checked that Check attachments before opening saving?
RThis may help where the recent EICAR test file was an
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 2:47:43 PM, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
JA The Eicar test virus should not need an update in the virus
JA definitions file, and should be there from the very beginning of the
JA life of the virus scanner. It's almost a defacto standard for quick
JA tests on viruses.
On Friday, November 08, 2002, John De Hoog wrote in
mid:E18A9el-0005K1-00;stromgrade.its-toasted.org:
And I don't expect a virus to come in the Known boxes.
Klez operates precisely by coming at you from a computer where you are
listed in their address book. That is likely, although not
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:58:03 + GMT (08/11/02, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
RW and, anyway, why should Editor settings affect the message
RW window - although they patently do?
A very good question my friend and one that should, perhaps, be
reported as a bug.
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 12:48:34 +0100 GMT (08/11/02, 18:48 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Ask PC-Cillin :-) My AVG w/ TB!-plugin caught it :-)
Seems your scanning ain't this effective as it should be, maybe you want
to test if PC-Cillin is capable of detecting eicar from a
Hello Clive,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 06:50:15 + GMT (08/11/02, 13:50 +0700 GMT),
Clive Taylor wrote:
I think Gary's comments are justified. I didn't know this was the
EICAR file because NOD's plugin deletes the attachment and doesn't flag
up which virus was attempting to infest this machine
Hello Dierk,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 11:49:31 +0100 GMT (08/11/02, 17:49 +0700 GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
BTW, your last sig cookie was a bit ... racy, wasn't it.
That depends *entirely* on your phantasy. I cannot help it if you have
a dirty mind... ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen
Friday, 11/8/2002, 8:32 AM
Hi Ochrid,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, at 16:34:05 [GMT +0100] (which was 7:34 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'e33 . not caught by AVG'
O But I would like AVG to warn me *before* I save something to
O disc. (with bugbears and its off spring I was always properly
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
8-Nov-2002, 22:56 +0700 (15:56 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:1793803176.20021108225654;gmx.net said:
A very good question my friend and one that should, perhaps, be
reported as a bug.
TF People may have a reason to view
Good afternoon Gerard,
It was foretold that on 5-11-2002 23:48:16 GMT+0100 (which was
23:48:16 where I live) Gerard would mumble:
snipped a bit
G As you can see from me explanation above I
G get flagged and non flaged msg were I only wanted the Non-Flagged
Indeed, strange behaviour.
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:08:47 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ask PC-Cillin :-) My AVG w/ TB!-plugin caught it :-)
Seems your scanning ain't this effective as it should be, maybe you
want to test if PC-Cillin is capable of detecting eicar from a file
by saving the
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:29:45 +0100
Dierk Haasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take care,
John
From shows Roland and it is signed by John?
Must be the template not changed to reflect a 'personal style' like ones
own name :-/
Default settings, not having a look at it ...
'Windows
Friday, November 8, 2002, 2:40:24 AM, John wrote in message
mid:4154599662.20021107214024;verizon.net
J It was obviously a mistake. I have been sending it to myself, for
J testing purposes and inadvertently sent it to the wrong address.
J My apologies to all.
No problem here John - just went to
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:44:34 + GMT (08/11/02, 23:44 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Indeed. The bug is that an editor setting (whether or not to wrap
text while composing mail) is used to govern whether or not the
*viewer* (PTV) wraps text too. That's not right IMHO.
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:48:04 +0100 GMT (08/11/02, 23:48 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
So your Plugin seems not to work as intendet or ain't properly
configured.
It is not a plug-in, and it used to work as expected (i.e. advise of
any viruses while downloading mail).
If
Bats-
NOD32 (not the plugin) also caught the test virus in digest mode. As
did Norton, even with virus definitions not up-to-date.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current version is 1.61 |
O But I would like AVG to warn me *before* I save something to
O disc. (with bugbears and its off spring I was always properly
O warned).
Paul I use AVG and it gave me a pop-up notification of the virus and
Paul isolated it.
thanks for responding, Paul, but it gets more worrying:
you and
Hi Allie,
On Friday, November 8, 2002 06:45 your local time, which was 03:45 my
local time, Allie Martin wrote;
MM This is a problem in The Bat!, not in plugin or AVG. Nested
MM messages are not correctly checked, because antivirus plugin have
MM not full message for checking. This was already
Marck-
Friday, November 8, 2002, 3:52:57 AM, you wrote:
MDP How I have seen this done in the past is for TB to use a shared
MDP network path to a mailbase for a common office-wide account. I have
MDP one customer using the system like this. That's one way of doing it.
I use this method on my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
8-Nov-2002, 10:21 -0800 (18:21 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in
mid:805434965.20021108102125;ahsoftware.net said:
MDP This second method is (IMHO) far more stable than literally
MDP sharing the folders across the network.
MW any reason for
Hello Ochrid,
On Friday, November 8, 2002, 1:09:49 PM, you wrote:
O I would almost ask John to send me the eicar again...
You email it to yourself at
www.info-techs.com/eicar.shtml
--
Patrick G.
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
ON Friday, November 8, 2002, 5:46:42 PM, you wrote:
L Indeed, strange behaviour. Could you post your filter so i can try it
L out?
Hi Luc,
If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to set-up
2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour.
First filter
Hi,
Friday, November 8, 2002, 11:48:34 AM, you wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:47:57 +0700
Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eicar.com
Why did my PC-Cillin6 with Real-Time Scan enabled not pick it up?
Ask PC-Cillin :-) My AVG w/ TB!-plugin caught it :-)
Seems your
Hi All,
On 8 Nov 2002 19:09:49 (my local time 10:09:49), Ochrid wrote
(in mid:1991142472.20021108190949;xs4all.nl)
So I wonder why I didn't get a pop-up!
Like you, the AVG didn't warn me upon receiving the eicar test file
last night.
It turns out that the AVG plug in is not activiated.
Go
Hello all,
since AVG did not warn me when John unwillingly sent the
eicar-file to the list, I got worried.
when I try to download the file myself, AVG does sound
alarm-popup's , but that is not good enough.
therefore: can someone send the eicar test file to me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I swear this
Hello Ochrid,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, at 21:30:39 [GMT +0100] (which was 20:30 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/
have a look at this site, it will test your email
security, including sending you EICAR.
O Hello all,
Marck-
Friday, November 8, 2002, 10:29:37 AM, you wrote:
MDP It's subjective. If one machine crashes while updating an index
MDP that's *all* systems mashed. It worries me, that's all.
Ah. That's all right, then. While overall system integrity is
certainly something that I worry about all the
Good evening Gerard,
It was foretold that on 8-11-2002 20:17:10 GMT+0100 (which was
20:17:10 where I live) Gerard would mumble:
snipped a bit
G If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to
G set-up 2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour.
Gerard,
thanks everyone for either sending me the eicar file (which still
doesn't get detected) or giving other hints and tips.
Anthony Xin Chen: I tried to follow your instructions:
Go to Options / Virus Protection /. Select the AVG plug in, then click
on the Configure button at right. Verify in the
Hello all,
when I sent myself the eicar-file from
http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/,
AVG did indeed warn me with a sound signal and a pop up.
I feel ever so relieved!
So, can it have been the digest format that tricked AVG?
Or what?
--
Regards,
Ochrid
_ The Bat! v1.62b7 op Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
8-Nov-2002, 14:24 -0800 (22:24 UK time) Mark Wieder [MW] in
mid:16720025675.20021108142436;ahsoftware.net said:
MDP - --
MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
MDP TB! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2
MW
I hope this time I can make myself understood a little better, since
my meaning is obviously not getting across. Maybe a good night's
sleep and some coffee will have helped. ^^;
Deborah W wrote...
JDH Unfortunately, I don't have a magic filter that excludes attachments
JDH from unknown
Good night Gerard,
It was foretold that on 8-11-2002 20:17:10 GMT+0100 (which was
20:17:10 where I live) Gerard would mumble:
snipped a bit
G If you want to try it out, it might be better if you tried to
G set-up 2 similar filters and see if you can get the same behaviour.
Gerard,
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 4:48:34 AM, you wrote:
SJ Does checking anything on the virus protection window actually make a
SJ difference if you do *not* have Kaspersky installed? Also, are there
SJ any antivirus external plug-ins available? $100 for Kaspersky Pro
SJ version
Friday, November 8, 2002, 10:25:56 AM, Marck wrote in message
mid:711723508.20021108102556;silverstones.com
MDP The limit has been 40kb and I have just dropped it to 25kb (which
MDP should be enough for most of us). That wouldn't have stopped the
MDP eicar test (at on 3kb it's pretty lean) but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anne,
9-Nov-2002, 02:52 Anne [A] in
mid:15812217495.20021109025228;gmx.co.uk said:
MDP The limit has been 40kb and I have just dropped it to 25kb
MDP (which should be enough for most of us). That wouldn't have
MDP stopped the eicar test (at on
86 matches
Mail list logo
