Howdy Thomas,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:00:39 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
There is no published list of these internal codes. In fact, the
filter and its innards are not meant to be read by humans. These
things only become visible when you cp filters, but if you want to
see/change
Hello James
JO I'd like to take a message/messages and submit them to a Bayesian
JO filter to learn my good versus spam messages.
Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Clive Taylor
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 |
Hello Allie,
Thursday, February 20, 2003, 12:29:37 PM, you wrote:
AM You should be getting a message without templates applied. If
AM templates are being applied, this means that you aren't really using
AM MAPI when generating the message but just a mailto: URL.
AM In order to
ON Thursday, February 20, 2003, 10:24:23 PM, you wrote:
JO Everyone's suggestions and comments are very appreciated.
Hi James,
I will assume that you have seen that there is an option in the filter
dialogs to execute an external program under actions.
The way I would do it would be to move
Suppose you are mistakenly emailing someone when he/or she is not
actually at home, or work. You were using the wrong address. Is it
possible to restrict access to sending email to a particular address
based on the time of day? At night, don't send to address B. In the
day, don't send to address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
@21-Feb-2003, 00:02 -0330 (03:32 UK time) Adam [A] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A Is it possible to restrict access to sending email to a
A particular address based on the time of day? At night, don't send
A to address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Barry Higginbottom [BH] wrote:'
BH In each program the 'Send' or 'Send Mail' command is in the File
BH menu.
BH So why is my setup contrary to what we should expect, I wonder?
It would seem that when
Hallo Marck,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:53:54 +GMT (21-2-03, 11:53 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
A Is it possible to restrict access to sending email to a particular
A address based on the time of day? At night, don't send to address
A B. In the day, don't send to address A.
MDP No,
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 12:00, Allie Martin wrote:
It would seem that when the file is added as an attachment, the
template is generated.
Not over here using Word 2000.
--
Regards,
Marcus Ohlström
Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
@21-Feb-2003, 12:21 +0100 (11:21 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP No,
RO Wouldn't it be possible to use an address book macro that
RO switches the recipient with the %To: macro based on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Roelof,
@21-Feb-2003, 12:21 +0100 (11:21 UK time) Roelof Otten [RO] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A Is it possible to restrict access to sending email to a
A particular address based on the time of day? At night, don't
A send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote:'
It would seem that when the file is added as an attachment, the
template is generated.
MO Not over here using Word 2000.
Do you have Adobe Acrobat? Try the same and
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 13:32, Allie Martin wrote:
MO Not over here using Word 2000.
Do you have Adobe Acrobat? Try the same and see.
I'm afraid not.
How do you get Word 2000 to use TB! as its MAPI client?
Don't know, I just assumed it was using MAPI. My fault.
So, how do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote:'
Do you have Adobe Acrobat? Try the same and see.
MO I'm afraid not.
Ok. When I use Adobe Acrobat here I get my default account template
being applied with the
Hi Chris,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 02:04:09 -0600GMT (21.02.03, 09:04 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CM Ok, but Mark's note says You will have to change the
CM name40domain.com:password text to be your account name and
CM password... what should I use for
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 13:44, Allie Martin wrote:
On checking the Word 2000 File menu, there's no choice to send
E-Mail. On reading the documentation, it says that I have to have
a registered default e-mail client, either OE5 or Outlook. Of
course, TB! is my default
How can one unsubscribe to this list? I haven't been able to find any
instructions for that.
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How can one unsubscribe to this list? I haven't been
able to find any instructions for that.
Sure not - because you are just to lazy! Each and every
damn message to this list has this line in the signature:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Would you mind reading this
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:41 AM, you wrote:
PM Hi Chris,
PM on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 02:04:09 -0600GMT (21.02.03, 09:04 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CM Ok, but Mark's note says You will have to change the
CM name40domain.com:password text to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
On Thursday, February 20, 2003 at 23:04 GMT -0600, Jonathan Angliss
[JA] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
%COMMENT='%QINCLIDE=nameofpgpstrip'
JA Silly fingers... should be %QINCLUDE not %QINCLIDE :)
Thanks for
Hello Marck,
Thursday, February 20, 2003, 6:15:50 PM, you wrote:
MDP Oh, you wanted to know more? Well, you don't say whether you want to
MDP filter on To: (that's Recipient) or look at it in a macro
MDP (%IF:%OTOADDR=[EMAIL PROTECTED]:do_this)
That is it alright! Question was too brief. But I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
@21-Feb-2003, 07:32 -0600 (13:32 UK time) Charles Olsen said:
How can one unsubscribe to this list? I haven't been able to find
any instructions for that.
To unsubscribe, use the Specials | Mailing list | Unsubscribe
option while
Hello kristina,
Thursday, February 20, 2003, 1:24:54 PM, you wrote:
k Is there anyway to remove the 'send queued mail'
k link from the right click menu, from the icon in
k the taskbar.
I'm not sure I see that in the taskbar. But I do see what
you mean.
k As I have had several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@21-Feb-2003, 08:36 -0500 (13:36 UK time) Paul Cartwright said:
I see nothing about what to do without a login, did I miss it?
No. I overdid the update. I've put a new version of the listing up
there that includes a filter for
Our chamber music society has a lot of AOL users. I've noticed that
e-mails from (all?) the AOL users who e-mail me seem to have the
following in common:
1. Our AOL using memberts' messages are time tagged with the
abbreviation for their time zone, rather than with their time zone's
offset
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
I see nothing about what to do without a login, did I miss it?
MDP No. I overdid the update. I've put a new version of the listing up
MDP there that includes a filter for non-members.
well I changed mine, thanks for the update!
I still don't
Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
~John,
On 21-02-2003 15:44, you [~] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
~ Clive Taylor wrote:
C Try POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
--
greeting Best regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 15:53 +0100 (14:53 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
Blacklists are
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Marck,
On 21-02-2003 16:01, you [M] wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ~John,
@21-Feb-2003, 09:08 -0600 (15:08 UK time) ~John [j] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
M Blacklists are dangerous and don't work IMNSHO.
j thanks Marck, could you recommend how you would setup SpamPal ?
I don't use it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@21-Feb-2003, 16:13 +0100 (15:13 UK time) Peter Fjelsten [PF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PF With the amount of spam today I feel this is the only way to go.
... if blacklists have a positive effect on incoming spam,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 21, 2003, St - Musaic.Net wrote...
How can one unsubscribe to this list? I haven't been able to find
any instructions for that.
Sure not - because you are just to lazy! Each and every
damn message to this list has this
Howdy Marck,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:18:37 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
No. I overdid the update. I've put a new version of the listing up
there that includes a filter for non-members.
Filters work like a champ. Thanks, Marck (sorry for misspelling your
name earlier).
--
Chris
Hello Marck,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
--
Al Jacobus
Using TheBat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current
1:
How can one unsubscribe to this list? I haven't been able to find any
instructions for that.
2:
Sure not - because you are just to lazy! Each and every damn message
to this list has this line in the signature:
3:
No offence, but was that necessary? Pointing out the link is usually
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
[strings]
£|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
[Location]
Subject
[Presence]
Yes
--
Regards,
~John
Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows 2000 5.0 (Build 2195)
2 Hard-drives (6 40 gig) 439 Mb RAM AMD 455 Processor.
Programs running in the background:
Hello Al,
Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Use POPFile from http://popfile.sourceforge.net/ which takes care by
itself about adding words, and in any language.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Peter
~ Or try SpamPal http://www.spampal.org.uk/
PF Yeah, much better as it has both Bayesian and blacklist lookup.
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder.
Hi St,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:25:52 +0100GMT (21.02.03, 18:25 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
No offence, but was that necessary? Pointing out the link is usually
enough. Insulting a person isn't good.
SMN It shouldn't be necessary - BUT at an
Hello John,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
~ [strings]
~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
Why you would include a £ symbol.
As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
e-mails could be filtered out as spam just
I recently did a sync between my MainPC and my laptop.
I followed the 3 step process in The Bat's Help file
and everything went fine.
I need to do it on a regular basis and can't get my
head around why I have to do a three stage process
EVERY time. I would have thought that after the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi Peter,
In a message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Feb 2003 16:13:35 , you typed:
M Anyone running a private mailserver on a dial-up has their IP listed
M in the blacklists.
PF There are many different blacklists. Some
I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master
set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to
multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session...
Friday, February 21, 2003, 11:23:51 AM, you wrote:
Here is a
Hello Paul Smithson,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 18:00:16GMT + (which was
1:00 PM in the tropics where I live) Paul Smithson postulated,
ruminated and made these points on the subject of Filters for Spam:
PS Hello John,
PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~
Hello Paul,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 12:00:16 PM, you wrote:
PS As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
PS e-mails could be filtered out as spam just because I
PS used the symbol of my countries currency (one of the
PS World's major currencies). If you are going to go
Paul Smithson wrote:
P Why you would include a £ symbol
Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ?
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Paul Smithson wrote:
P As a Brit I feel pretty insulted that my genuine
P e-mails could be filtered out as spam just because I
P used the symbol of my countries currency
If someone is using currency symbols in the subject line, it is
probably because they are wanting to sell
Hi Spike,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:21:46 -0500GMT (21.02.03, 19:21 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
S Example from a recent Asian spam:
S Subject: ¡m¤@Ó§Y£±N¾î±½½u¤W¹£CÀ¸ªº¤j«¬¹qª±½Ï¥Í¡A¡i¨M¾Ô¡j¹CÀ¸±N©ó12¤ë
S
Hi Robert,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:25:52 -0600GMT (21.02.03, 19:25 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
RCW Roughly 1/3 of the spam I see looks like this:
RCW ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÇÒ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ , with no standard ASCII chars anywhere south of
RCW the header.
It only means
Hello ~John,
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
[strings]
£
You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
e-mail :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:21 PM, you wrote:
S I wish there was an easy way to copy filters between accounts or make a master
S set of filters that work on all accounts... I get the same spam coming to
S multiple email address and have to delete them over and over in 1 session...
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 19:45:04GMT +0100 (which was
1:45 PM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech posted:
[strings]
£
MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
MAU e-mail :)
If you send me mail with $, £ or any
Hello Clive,
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
messages per day and the last time
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
M e-mail :)
No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add
you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail
before my Spam filters would.
--
Regards,
~John
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 3:39 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: PC-cillin vs the Bat
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 6:04 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Wrapping of paragraphs
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 8:38 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: PC-cillin vs the Bat
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 8:00 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: SpamCop Filter Questions
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 8:41 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: PC-cillin vs the Bat
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 9:04 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: SpamCop Filter Questions
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 10:16 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 6:04 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Wrapping of paragraphs
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 11:00 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 7:02 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: PC-cillin vs the Bat
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 6:33 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** SpamCop Filter Questions
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 11:53 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Email restrict
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 12:00 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Macros and MAPI
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 8:40 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re[2]: PC-cillin vs the Bat
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 12:21 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Email restrict
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 12:51 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Macros and MAPI
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
On vrijdag 21 februari 2003 at 9:07 you wrote
subject: **SPAM** Re: Plug-in/Feature Request
Can someone explain this to me, as I am getting HUNDREDS`of them or
similar. I don't seem to have a font that will display them (Netscape
says I need a Chinese font, when I try to load the HTML component)
I just delete them, but they are very annoying in the hundreds daily.
With a 'TO: 1236,
Hello Frank,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:02:53 +0100 GMT (22/02/03, 02:02 +0700 GMT),
Frank Nijkamp wrote:
Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
as spam. If this is not the case, please reply this message without
altering the subject.
ROTFLMAO!
--
Cheers,
Hello ~John,
No, I would not. If I was going to do business with you, I would add
you to my address book, then my Known filter would catch your E-Mail
before my Spam filters would.
You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose
name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
M Fully agree with you about POPFile. I get an average of 30 spam
M messages per day and
Hi Frank,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:03:46 +0100GMT (21.02.03, 20:03 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
FN as spam.
There must be something wrong with your filters. This was a legitimate
Hello Spike,
If you send me mail with $, £ or any other currency symbol in the
Subject line, you would certainly be sent to my TRASH folder, as you
are trying to sell me something I did not request.
I said: If we were doing business... :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello Bats,
Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-))
alas, now it is too late...
--
Best Whishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Miguel,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 7:57:08 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello Clive,
I disagree. After one month's training Popfile is running at 99.5%
accuracy. I'm left with maybe one spam message every two days that's
not filtered into my spam folder. Impressive,
MAU Fully agree with you
ON Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:46:39 PM, you wrote:
AJ Could you share your spam filters with the group? It seems I am
AJ constantly adding words and I know there must be another, simpler way.
Al,
Here is my tip:
After filtering out al know email try searching for To unsubscribe
in TEXT. I
Hi Frank,
on Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:03:52 +0100GMT (21.02.03, 20:03 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
FN as spam.
Now your spam protection has turned to the opposite: you're spamming
all
Hello TB Users,
I can't save Account Properties. Each time I open The Bat! everything
is lost. What do I do to fix the problem?
Using Windows XP.
--
Sergey Kalabekov
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:52:02GMT +0700 (which was
2:52 PM in the tropics where I live) Thomas Fernandez posted:
TF Come again? How can that misconfigured spampal reply have triggered a
TF filter to send the message to 11,000+ people?
My CNET virus
Hello!
Fri Feb 21 2003 23:01:05 Sergey Kalabekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SK I can't save Account Properties. Each time I open The Bat!
SK everything is lost. What do I do to fix the problem?
SK Using Windows XP.
That may be a permission problem with the
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT section
Hello,
That may be a permission problem with the
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT section in the registry. You need to
double-check the ACLs using the regedt32.exe program.
I couldn't find a problem. I forgot to say that I have two accounts,
but experience the problem with one.
Best Regards,
Hello Mark,
I'm willing to give POPFile a try, however. What is the URL?
http://popfile.sourceforge.net/
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello ~John,
Have you guys used SpamPal ?
Yes, for a couple of days and decided to stay with POPFile.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Thomas,
I haven't used spampal, but I see that it is not that easy to
configure, judging from the recent flushing of TBUDL by one Frank
Nijkamp. ;-)
But that is also because Spampal has the option to bounce (actually
a reply) spam messages which, to my knowledge, is completely wrong in
Hello Mark,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:23:03 PM, you wrote:
MP Hello Bats,
MP Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-))
MP alas, now it is too late...
Strange, in the original message, the subject was:
Not 20 ¥, not 20 £ but 20 ¤
Anyone any idea why this was changed,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
M You are right. Anyway, I would never do business with someone whose
M name I can't pronounce. How the h*** you pronounce ~John starting with
M the ~? ;-)
Very carefully!
LOL
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 |
Mark Partous wrote:
M Now John did not see I was planning to donate him 20 ¤! :-))
M alas, now it is too late...
As Homer Simpson would say, DOH !!!
--
Regards,
~John
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hi Thomas and list,
On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36
where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
these valuable points on the subject of Plug-in/Feature Request to
allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or group of
I don't see it as a problem on TBUDL. There are two or sometimes three
such requests per month. I think your feeling fed up stems from your
other lists.
Not from the lists I administrate - my own system using explicit addys
for unsubscribing works as I want them to. But I have seen this
Hello,
SK I can't save Account Properties. Each time I open The Bat! everything
SK is lost. What do I do to fix the problem?
I notice that you're working with a beta-version:
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.63 Beta/2) Educational
AFAIK, this is a known bug in Beta/2, and it's already solved in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, February 21, 2003
5:37:31 PM
RE: **SPAM** Re[2]: Macros and MAPI
Greetings Frank,
On Friday, February 21, 2003, 2:04:02 PM, you wrote:
FN Since I'm using Spampal, all Spam is refused. Your mail is recognised
FN as spam. If this is not the
Can someone explain this to me, as I am getting HUNDREDS`of them or
similar. I don't seem to have a font that will display them (Netscape
says I need a Chinese font, when I try to load the HTML component)
It's likely Chinese spam - the spammers couldn't care less whether the
mail is
Hello Michael,
I downloaded SpamPal two days ago because of people on this list. It
was very easy to setup and works awesome and invisible. I put all my
spam in a spam trap folder, as suggested on the author's website.
Once a day, I go into the spam trap folder and add users to my
whitelist
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 at 14:14:12 -0500 Spike wrote:
Can someone explain this to me, as I am getting HUNDREDS`of them or
similar.
It's spam.
I don't seem to have a font that will display them (Netscape
says I need a Chinese font, when I try to load the HTML component)
Yes, it's in Chinese.
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
