Hello one and all,
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the remainder of
the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter is in the INCOMING MAIL
I was trying to explain to a few people, on another List, about the
need and usefulness of the *cut mark* sequence. What I really wanted
was just a little *clout*, for want of a better word. If there was an
RFC *suggesting* the use thereof, I would like to point to that in
future discussions just
Hello Group,
On Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 12:11:17 PM, Robert wrote:
I was trying to explain to a few people, on another List, about the
need and usefulness of the *cut mark* sequence. What I really wanted
was just a little *clout*, for want of a better word. If there was an
RFC
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, Robert D. wrote:
I was trying to explain to a few people, on another List, about the
need and usefulness of the *cut mark* sequence. snip
If there was an RFC *suggesting* the use thereof
RFC2646, section 4.3
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html
--
Urban
I think
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, Urban wrote:
RFC2646, section 4.3
Oops, I was to fast again. 2646 has been superseded by rfc3676
ANyway, same section (4.3)
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3676.html
I think the phrasing a long-standing convention is the closest to an
actual suggestion you'll get from a
Hello Jack,
Welcome back.
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:58:49 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 17:58 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
JSL incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
JSL one name in the RULE tab under
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote:
TF Where are you?
TF I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a
TF General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab.
He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system. I
Recently, Urban squawked:
I think the phrasing a long-standing convention is the closest to
an actual suggestion you'll get from a rfc.
Perfect! Thanks. I made a short TB Template which I *could* include
quickly to make a point admittedly for blind eyes and deaf ears
--
dashdashspace
RFC
Hello Stuart,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:14:08 -0500 GMT (25/10/2005, 20:14 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system.
Oops, my bad.
SC I don't remember how to use the old system and I don't have access
SC to an old copy.
Me neither.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005,
@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on
Hi
On Monday 24 October 2005 at 10:45:40 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote:
I'm going to add a note to
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5222
Thank you, Mary.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
You're only young once; you can be immature forever
Using
On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS and the remainder of
the names in the ALTERNATIVES tab. The filter
Hello everyone,
I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try try again until I
find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry photos?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
I am compelled to fear that science will be used to promote the power
Hello Alexander,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 2:56:55 PM, you wrote:
I can't find this information (and I'm too lazy to try try again
until I find it) - whats the best picture size for the AB entry
photos?
120x144, the same size as most roguemoticons surprisingly! grin
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
