MAU wrote:
> It looks like not many people is watching this list any more.
> I am still using Win 10, so I have no idea about Win 11, sorry.
> I am using 9.5.1 and I find it very stable. No idea about v10.3.2, I
> never upgraded or tried v10.
> I asume it will, but I really don't know. I
Hi all,
It's been many years since I posted on this list, and I'm hoping you
can give me some good advice.
I'm currently changing over from my old Win7 computer to a new Win11
desktop. I'm still running TheBat version 4.2.44.2, which I don't
suppose will work on Win11. I've never upgraded
RS (FEDARA) wrote:
Do they allow usage of v4 if a client have v5 licence?
Yes, I e-mailed Ritlabs to ask how I should proceed, and they told me to
upgrade to v5 (with a 30% discount), then e-mail them with the serial number
and they'll give me a registration key valid for v4.x.
--
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
I'm not really bothered about the html editor - I normally use plain
text anyway.
MFPA wrote:
Not sure if this is relevant to your situation, but 4.0.38 is the
newest version you can use with a v3 licence.
I have a v1.60h business edition licence, so I'm
Hi all,
I'm still using version 1.60h, which I've been very happy with, so I've
never bothered upgrading.
I've been thinking of upgrading recently because the Scheduler would be very
useful, but having read recent posts here and on the Ritlabs forum, it
doesn't sound as though an upgrade to
Mark Wieder wrote:
What symptoms are you having when the computer won't shut down
properly?
When I shut down the computer, Windows 2000 goes through the usual
procedure, saying it's saving my settings, then that Windows is closing
down.
Then, instead of closing down normally and giving me
I recently had to get a new hard drive, and I'm now having problems with it,
because Windows 2000 won't shut down properly.
The guy who installed the hard drive said something must have gone wrong
with one of the programs I installed after he delivered it, and to try
uninstalling and reinstalling
I'm sure this is a silly question, but I can't find the answer in the FAQ.
I'm still using The Bat 1.60h, and it's got huge - there are something like
50,000 messages divided between 3 different accounts. I realise this isn't
ideal - it runs too slowly, and the FAQ says there should be no more
Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
This problem rings a bell, but I cannot remember the details.
I think I raised it on this list about a year ago, before I got the
router.
I am
pretty sure that the problem is not with TB! however - I think that
the problem will be with your router, possibly
I have two e-mail accounts, one of which I normally use, and one in
reserve. I'm having to use the reserve one at present because of a
problem with the main one, and I'm finding that I can't send large
attachments with it using the Bat!, although the two accounts appear
to be identically
I want to send a message to all my clients with my holiday dates.
I've set up two groups, so I can send the message in two different
languages to various clients.
However, I want all the addresses to appear in the BCC field so that
the clients don't see each other's addresses.
I can't find a
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Well, you have half the steps done by the looks of it. You created
them as groups, which will probably save you a fair bit of time. Start
a new message, make sure the bcc field is visible. If it is not, go to
View, and check the BCC option. You now should have two
Karin Spaink wrote:
I tried both Mozilla and NS4.7. Neither work, alas.
It works OK with Netscape 4.79, but only if you enable cookies.
It took me ages to work that out.
It's still pretty slow compared with html, though.
--
Mary
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jernej Simoni wrote:
SJ You have to exit the dos window manually. Does anyone
SJ know how to do that in the bat file?
The simplest way is to put CLS at the very end of file.
Surely that just clears the DOS screen without exiting the DOS window?
--
Mary
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Okay. It is a drop target. You have to save your attachment and drop
it onto a shortcut to the fentun program. Then a window opens showing
you the names of any attachments within the message.att file and you
get the opportunity to extract them.
I have a shortcut
Jernej Simoni wrote:
MC 1. Please can the next version of TB treat attachments just like
MC normal mailreaders do?
It already does that - normal mail readers don't support MS's
proprietary format.
I don't have wide experience of other mailreaders, just Netscape and
Eudora, and I've never
Alastair Scott wrote:
Last shot :)
Is it only one particular file in Word 2000 format that's causing the
stoppage, or can you repeat the problem with different files?
No, unfortunately I've had the same problem with various different
files, all in Word2000.
They're mostly files I've
Mary Cassidy wrote:
Does nobody have any more suggestions?
Problem solved! (I think; so far it works, anyway.)
I just read the message from Ian G quoted by David Stone in the thread
Cannot read some messages in a folder, which finally put me on the
right track.
Ian G said:
What's
Andrew Aronoff wrote:
Mary -- Are you logging on to Windows 2000 with Administrator
rights?
Yes.
Alastair -- Many mail systems now refuse executable file attachments
and many users are very wary of opening executable attachments that
they have not already been advised to expect.
Yes,
Mary Cassidy wrote:
Problem solved! (I think; so far it works, anyway.)
S**t! Spoke too soon...
The file I sent successfully from the Win2000 partition had always
been in that partition.
Just now, I had to send a file that was in the Win98 partition. I
copied it to the Win2000 partition
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Since I use more than one partition and have never been having
problems sending attachments (also using Winword2K), but all on
Win95c, I try to venture into saying that the problem lies with some
rights or formatting.
Maybe your W2K partition is in NTFS?
Or one of
Mary Cassidy wrote:
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Maybe your W2K partition is in NTFS? Or one of your partition uses
Doubledisk ( or whatever the name today is)?
No idea - my supplier set up the partitions.
Where do I look?
I should have thought of searching Explorer before.
I have 4 files
Received Created
Mary Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18:53 17:18
Dierk Hasis [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- 21:48 19:31 ---
Mary Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:42 20:33
Mary Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20:53 20:49
That's odd; I received them all in the right order.
I checked the clock
Nils Haag (m. l.) ha scritto:
Hello Mary, hi list,
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002 'Mary Cassidy' wrote:
I have no problem sending messages without attachments or with small
attachments, but when the attachment is larger (not even very large,
say around 70 Kb) the call sometimes gets
Mary Cassidy ha scritto:
How are you connected to the internet?
Dial-up connection, set to manual dial-up.
I never had this problem with Netscape or Eudora, so I thought I must
have set something wrong in TB.
I've set it to put the attachments in the message body, not in a
separate file
Thomas F wrote:
Hello Mary,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:17:02 +0100 GMT (17/01/02, 17:17 +0800 GMT),
Mary Cassidy wrote:
I've set it to put the attachments in the message body, not in a
separate file; could that be the problem?
No; I have the same setting.
MC I spoke to my ISP immediately
Mary Cassidy wrote:
So if it happens with two ISPs, and has never happened with Netscape
or Eudora, the only thing left seems to be a wrong setting of mine in
TB or some kind of conflict.
Operating system: Win2000 with Office2000. The attachments were Word
documents.
Just
Thomas F wrote:
Go to Account / Properteis / FilesDirectories. Have you activated [x]
Bind attachments only when... ? I have.
No (didn't know what it meant and didn't find it in the Help). Anyway
it didn't work; usual error message.
I think you are sending the mail with attachment
Mary Cassidy wrote:
Anyway it didn't work; usual error message.
I just tried an entirely different tack; I saved the document in Word
6.0/95 and guess what? it worked.
But why?
I've only recently started using Win2000 with Office2000 (my
supplier's lent me a copy to evaluate
Andrew Aronoff wrote:
Hello Mary,
MC Any more ideas before I give up and go back to Netscape? :-)
Before you jump back, I have a couple of suggestions:
1. Set to store the attachments in a separate folder and see what
happens.
Just tried it, no luck, usual message in the log.
If
Alastair Scott wrote:
Aha, an idea :)
Go to the 'Account' menu, select the 'Properties ...' item, then
select the 'Files Directories' item in the left-hand pane then look
at the drop-down box entitled 'By default encode attachments using'.
Change the setting there to the opposite of
Jernej Simoni wrote:
E How do I alphabetize the folders created to accommodate the filters?
Click on the [Name] column header. You'll get a message saying This
will change the order of folders. Do you want to process?. Click OK.
There's one minor bug (or is it a feature?) with this
I've been using the Bat! for a couple of days, and this is the
first problem I've come across.
I have no problem sending messages without attachments or with small
attachments, but when the attachment is larger (not even very large,
say around 70 Kb) the call sometimes gets cut off about halfway
Andrew Aronoff wrote:
Hi, Thomas.
1. Nicked nicknames
TF Options / Preferences / System / Autocomplete.
Yes, I've checked that and chosen Default address book only.
Nicknames work most of the time, but not all of the time, even with
Ctrl+. As I said, I haven't yet spotted what needs to
Andrew Aronoff ha scritto:
Hello Mary,
MC if a nickname is associated with more than one e-mail address, TB
MC doesn't tell me, but just displays the first one.
In principle, nicknames are supposed to be _unique_.
Sorry, I sent the message too quickly.
I meant *name, not nickname.
--
Costas ha scritto:
CP Press the Ctrl-Shift-Delete keys, without having to open the thread
CP (+) sign.
Alternatively, right-click on the (+) sign and hit delete in the drop-down menu.
--
Mary (Bat user since yesterday!)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
