Re: Pasting Tabs

-- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.98.11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) If things appear to be going well, you have overlooked something. Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Psychic cookies?

to help him with a script that deletes d**n Apple-files from the USB-Stick ... The randomly (Ha! I'm still thinking there's an AI inside TB!) chosen cookie: Apple: An over-sized calculator with a detatchable monitor. Coincidence? ... -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: Simple Filter

header field X-Spam-Level starts with ** I'd make this match and ^\*\*\s*$, unless the OP wants to filter all mail that contains *at least* two asterixes in X-Spam-Level:. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) It always takes longer than you

Re: TB to work in a network

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:31:05PM +0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could TB be also in a network? Yes. say A, B C computers have TB installed. could the A computer be the main server? Yes. does this mean that all outgoing/incoming mail has to pass through A computer? You can set up

Re: Jack's announces his new upgrade policy for TB

chances to find somebody helping your solve your problem(s) can be lowered to estimated zero. For me that's not really a problem, it might just be one for you, someday. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Circus Bear is fuzzy

Re: Splitting domain

to answer this way. One might parse (regexp) e.g. 'Delivered-To:' headers, or maybe any other field that helps to identify whom this mail was directed to. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) This isn't right. This isn't even wrong

Re: Splitting domain

filters for incoming mail and store messages in separate folders; one for each intended sender address. - Set the folders Identity (as part of Folder Properties) to the intended sender address - Be happy ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack

Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

the chip card and then enter the PIN (instead of the usual password dialog). Seems I don't get only TB! to behave this way, it's just I don't want to use Outlook or Outlook Express for sending mails signed with this certificate ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

something with them ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) She's dead Jim... Still warm though. Flip ya for her? Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Help with S/MIME on Microsoft Crypto API

be wrong. So is anybody using TB!3 with S/MIME on MS crypto API, driven by a chip card? And if so: what's the way to go? Thanks a lot in advance, -- best regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.51.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) I like long walks, especially when they are taken

Re: spamalot

. DH Anyway, I'll give it a try for about 4 weeks and if I like DH it, I keep it else I will go back to Spambayes. Don't get me wrong: I never intended to detain somebody from using it, I just wanted to know what is pretended to make this program so predominant ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: spamalot

? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5.26 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) A chubby man with a white beard and a red suit will approach you soon. Avoid him. He's a Commie. Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Hypocrisy is the K-Y Jelly of social intercourse. Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: block email not sent to you

to you. 'BCC' is just a visualization to end users of SMTPs 'RCPT TO' concept. You can't distinguish if a mail was intentionally BCC-ed to you or sent e.g. as not visibly addressed spam. They both are identical in their headers: you not in 'To' or 'CC'. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat

Re: Anonymous emails?

... trying to work out if that is a joke on me or not ;) Not on you :-) More directed to those people who think they can black hole their existence in the Internet ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) We have them exactly where they want us

Re: Anonymous emails?

to accomplish. *cough* May god save your optimism *cough* ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Just because there are a few good apples, it doesn't mean that the rest aren't rotten through and through

Re: Anonymous emails?

is the black hole located *if* somebody enables this security feature? I have a theory this black hole is a few inches in front of the monitor, between a pair of human ears ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Zimmerman's Law of Complaints

Re: Anonymous emails?

/remail.html http://mixmaster.sourceforge.net/ http://www.quicksilvermail.net/ http://anonymous.to/ -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Anal retentive people don't give a crap. Current version

Re: Anonymous emails?

is! I bet he blocks packets of type ICMP Echo request and drops them on his firewall, therefore he's *absolutely invisible*!!! Trust me!1!eins!elf!! ;-) SIRCNR ;-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Lord, give me chastity. But not yet. - St

Re: Proposal for spam filters

from being tagged as spam. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Cynicism is intellectual dandyism. Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat

Re: Proposal for spam filters

(which also includes Spam Assassin but I can not SL control their copy of course). That's odd. But can't you see the recipient in the list of trapped spam? This way you can free mails to '@thebat.dutaint.com', instead of these with 'TBUDL' in subject?!? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5

Re: Mod: Top posting

below, is not encouraged and we actually request that you not do so on this list because a) It makes it difficult to glean context from what you typed at the top of the message SL I disagree with you. However it is your forum. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1

Re: SMTP problem solved

Hello The, On Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 3:25:01 AM The [TBs] wrote: TBs I did not change anything, the problem went away... Glad to hear, glad for you. TBs So Peter (Palmreuther): it is not as obvious as you thought... Above cited sentence tells me: it is. Obviously the server had

Re: SMTP problem

. Quite obvious, isn't it? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.5 Return RC1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) You can't underestimate the power of fear. - Tricia Nixon Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http

Re: parameters in QTs

really don't get your point ... :-/ -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) Adding manpower to a late software project only makes it later. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information

Re: PGP support in TB 3.x: OpenPGP option and spotting PGP messages with filters

, is satisfied. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) It was a book to kill time for those who liked it better dead. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: Pgp Software

to open it first. This open would fail if the file(s) were non-readable. So it/they must be readable, else you wouldn't be able to open it yourself. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) So, George, do you really believe Monotheism is a gift from

Re: Pgp Software

be narrow-minded :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) We are not punished for our sins, but by them. Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com

Re: parameters in QTs

by an InputBox popping up on every reply or new message :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2) I was gratified to be able to answer promptly, and I did. I said I didn't know. Current

Re: parameters in QTs

Hello Michael, On Monday, October 18, 2004 at 9:47:23 PM Michael [MLW] wrote: MLW I will never, ever tell anyone on this list or any other TB list about MLW how much spam I get or what version of BayesIT I have. Fear not I didn't :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows

AOL SMTP

Hello List, after a long quite period I'm (at least for now) back :-) Anybody here who managed it to use The Bat! on an AOL e-mail account, using AOL SMTP for outgoing messages? If so: what settings are necessary (server, port, SSL/STARTTLS)? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v3.0.0.15

Re: Filter Statistics

Hi Michael, On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:39:24 +0100 Michael Thompson wrote: Maybe, only maybe, I'll rewrite the whole stuff one day; chances are I have a little more spare time starting with September. But I guarantee for nothing; neither the program nor the further development ATM :-) Not bad,

Re: Filter Statistics

spare time starting with September. But I guarantee for nothing; neither the program nor the further development ATM :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) To see the unseen glitter of life... - Faith No More

Re: setting account password prevent download??

Hi tracer, On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:13:30 +0700 tracer wrote: I really would apreciate stuff to be collected with or without password so I can ask the secretary later to download to lot without being able to read them all.. I guess you're talinkg about a account accessing password and not the

Re: TheBat Help file

to be discussed with Dieter first, for TF copyright issues. Correct :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) Sometimes a man will tell his bartender things he'll never tell his doctor. Current

Re: SMTP authentication difficulty in The Bat

Hi Alexander, On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:22:11 +0200 Alexander wrote: (You may remember that I could not achieve the necessary SMTP authentication while _sending mail_ from The Bat through ChoiceMail.) Just one question - the test mail you were sending with Netscape, did you send it through

Re: Mass Exporting Messages

and appending ';UNIX' (w/o single quotes) to the command line will export the four folders into one UNIX-MBox file. So: no click and point operation, but a solvable task. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) This tagline is password

Re: SMTP authentication difficulty in The Bat

up communication. But as AUTH in general is working it'd call it a *very* minor priority issue :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) Winners at the card party were William Davenport, a turkey, and Mrs. Trudy Baker, a chicken

Re: Mass Exporting Messages

better, btw) German help file, that lists all (at least I haven't missed one yet) of them. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) Seen on a tombstone: I told you I was sick! Current version

Re: TheBat Help file

or whoever being able to read and respond? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/11 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) Biggest security gap - an open mouth. Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: SMTP authentication difficulty in The Bat

Hi David, On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:27:21 -0400 David Austen wrote: But I am unable to configure The Bat to send mail with SMTP authentication through ChoiceMail. What do the logs say?[tm] Ctrl+Shift+A should reveal an error message we'll need for better guessing. -- Ciao, Pit

Re: Power Pro

Hi Ciprian, On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:28:08 +0300 Ciprian Trofin wrote: What is Power Pro ? Well, is it really _that_ hard to use a search engine? I'm really astonished ... http://www.google.com/search?q=PowerPro | --- http://www.windowspowerpro.com/ -- Ciao, Pit

Re: Power Pro

Hi Ciprian, On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:25:03 +0300 Ciprian Trofin wrote: Well, is it really _that_ hard to use a search engine? I'm really astonished ... I'm sorry I offended you. I wrote I'm *astonished*, not 'offended'. I tried Power Pro (2 words); the result was something like fishing

Re: Problems with file types

, whatever; just make sure it's nothing like Word, write or similar) and have a look if you see only plain text or similar garbage as The Bat! makes of it. In the latter case you've found the culprit: Lookout produces non-usable (at least not outside Lookout) message files. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: SMTP authentication problem

Hi Omar, On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:46:11 -0300 Omar Colocci wrote: [webhosts SMTP-AUTH ain't working] but the webhost returns the message child crashed (#4.3.0). When I disable the authentication it returns Sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1). Well ... that sounds

Re: How to restore folders are on hard drive.. but not in inbox

Hi Laura, On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 09:14:40 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have folders on my hard drive that contain the TBB files and I would like to restore that in the Bat. Is there a way to bring the messages back in? Have you considered giving Tools / Import / From The Bat! Message base

Re: Memo data missing

Hi Luc, On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:10:14 +0200 Luc wrote: After making a fresh account and ding a restore from my back ups, all my data from the memo field was gone and this for all of my accounts. Is there a way to retrieve them, I'd guess the answer is No. maybe a separate file they are

Re: Newbie, need help using The Bat! Clueless

' to see results of your changes. If you have any concrete questions, e.g. I want a new message to look this and this and the recipients shoe size automatically entered here simply ask back here, describing your problem as much detailed and specific as possible. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: Registration

Hi Jernej, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:10:11 +0200 Jernej Simonèiè wrote: This is probably because of a reported bug in the %SINGLERE macro in the recent beta versions, rather than a regex... It's the regex... Absolutely sure??? I can't imagine how a regex that formerly took care of a special

Re: Re[2]: Registration

Hi Jernej, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:51:34 +0200 Jernej Simonèiè wrote: [...] (?i)\A\:?(\s*\[.*\]\s)?(\s*(re|ha|rcpt|fwd| fw|fw|aw)%- (\[\d*\])?:*)*(.*) This is the relevant part. As far as I can see this strips 're', 'fwd' ... etc, followed by maybe '[number]' plus potentially ':'s. So in

Re: Automated response(?)

Hi Mike, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:54:37 -0400 Mike Apsey wrote: Regretably I explicitly and emphatically trust no-one in things e-mail So your best bet is to stop posting. Even if archive conceals addresses in mail bodies (very bad, btw. look into HTML source at the bottom of the page), every

Re: Multiple Email Clients running simultaneously?

Hi DG, On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:34:39 -0400 DG Raftery Sr. wrote: Can I safely run multiple email clients simultaneously, on Windows XP Pro? Yes. I am going to respectively disagree. The keyword here is simultaneously. Two apps running a poll to a POP server(s) on port 110 would tend to

Re: invalid domain name

. At least it _is_ a server setting, albeit not necessarily a problem in general. ÖH I even contacted the people at that server, but they had no ideas. That's sad ... I'd reconsider my relationship to them, it seems they have no idea what their server does :-((( -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat

Re: invalid domain name

of your computer in network identification settings. Make sure it contains only ASCII-127 characters and first is only a 'hostname', means no domain name appended (no period contained). if this still fails try giving a complete domain name, e.g. mycomputer.chello.se, or similar. -- Regards Peter

Re: invalid domain name

on a Samba share or similar. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3) God gives us relatives; thank God we can choose our friends. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: invalid domain name

people tend to name their computers not every time following valid rules and as long as Windows is not going to tell them, but accepting it they can't know about this issue. So the best best is to make it fail safe and use only allowed parts of a computers name on The Bat!'s side. -- Regards Peter

Re: Re[2]: passing an argument when calling a dialer application

Hi Heijo, On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:57:10 +0100 Heijo Alting wrote: Just copy and paste the filter into your incoming message filter set. Which file would that be? No file. Noone mentioned a file (except you). Copy the text sent by Marck and paste it into your incoming message filter set, as

Re: passing an argument when calling a dialer application

Hi Heijo, On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:19:35 +0100 Heijo Alting wrote: No. Of course this is only a dummy, assuming you already know what your dialing application is I experimented with Windows XP Dialer.exe, but until now I was unable to pass line commands to it. Do you know a dialer

Re: Very important issue has come to my attention!!

Hi Newsacct, On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:15:42 -0500 Newsacct wrote: I must say that although I agree with you on how anyone can get this info from a phonebook or whatever, a phonebook doesn't give you mapped directions to your house from any location in the US. No. Only the address

Re: Problem with large file attachments?

Hi Barry, On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:42:37 + Barry Higginbottom wrote: Well, I was trying out the 'Whoeasy' plugin on Outpost so I decided to remove it as its evaluation time was almost up. Now then, fingers crossed, everything *seems* back to normal. Mind you, I don't really understand

Re: migrating migraine

Hi Heijo, On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:42:46 +0100 Heijo Alting wrote: After some migration problems, I decided to uninstall The Bat! and install it, this time I imported two accounts that were backed up with The Bat!. All went fine, and I see no more error messages, but I seem to have lost my

Re: Problem with large file attachments?

application a try, chances are high the problem is located there. That doesn't mean you have to keep them deactivated 'til eternity, maybe the offending application can be fixed by some settings, after knowing which one it is. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0

Re: Sounds bad

Hello Spyder, On Tuesday, March 18, 2003 at 8:47:58 AM you [S]wrote (at least in part): S I did not see play wave in the filter rules... or did I miss it (like I missed S F9)??? Yes, you are. Tab Actions at the _VERY_ bottom (notice the scrollbar on the right). -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: shared folders - one more try

about it not 100% working) The Bat! Server mode is implemented. This way it knows about sharing and can handle concurrent accesses. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) God is the tangential point between zero and infinity. -- Alfred

Re: Threading by reference

] The order is pure random and does not imply anything -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Lead me not into temptation. I can find it myself. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information

Re: shared folders - one more try

implementation is only designed to be thread-safe, not share-safe, you're expecting something that ain't programmed. Like if you'd expect a Fiat Uno being able to drag your mobile home, to spare the costs of a truck :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195

Re: Mailbox Locked by a Pop3 Session

a server side problem, which can't under no circumstances be solved from client side (unless you have shell access to this server and write permissions in the directory mailboxes are located in). -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) I never

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Jernejcic, On Wednesday, March 5, 2003 at 9:13:32 PM you [JA]wrote (at least in part): JA is there anybody out there *really* using shared folders with more JA than two users simultaniously? No ... but were in The Bat! you've seen shared folders? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat

Re: Feature Request - Launch into Notepad

Hi Miguel, On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 19:28:04 +0100 Miguel A. Urech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I HATE HATE HATE HTML emails... but it appears that most newer users don't know any better and send emails in them. I love the way that The Bat makes them seperate files/attachments so that I do not have to

Re: Reading Header Info

Hi Jonathan, On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:25:20 -0600 Jonathan Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The other is a mess up at the mail server end... and the headers get included. That's the _only_ way one would be able to tell (beside the administrative way of inspecting mail logs). Eevn if the client

Re: Mark thread read ...

Hi Stuart, On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:02:51 + Stuart Hemming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... or what is a thread? Imagine I have a set of messages threaded thus: Root |- (1) Single Message |- (2) Sub-thread |- (3) Sub-thread Now, if I were reading the root and pressed

Re: LoVe Cock ?

Hi D, I want ... not repost my questions. -- Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: LIKELY SPAM: (was: plugin for the bat!: vampire)

, but a spammer hosting one like Spamhaus states too. So in this case you're the innocent victim of your ISPs actions. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Bother said Pooh, as he destroyed New Hampshire

Re: A way to modify _incoming_ mail

Hi Pavel, On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:36:09 +0200 Pavel Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail? In particular I wish to process Subjects of received letters removing some extra information like [this-list] or [that-list] etc. Is there a way to do this

Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?

Hi Thomas, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:31:18 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need an explanation ; sometimes when I retrieve my e-mails, the connection center seems to to messages, I see furtively reception of headers : reception message #1 for one message and nothing more, I

Re: TB and PC protection

Hi Miles, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:54:59 -0500 Miles Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please vote for something you have actually been using! FIREWALL #1 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #2 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] #3 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] ANTIVIRUS #1 choice [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Retrieving mail problrem ?

Hi Thomas, On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 23:34:21 +0700 Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is aktive of message dispatcher is invoked. ^ I know you mean or, not if. ;-) This C :-) o 1 :-))) -- Regards, Pit Current version is

Re: problem ssl myrealbox.com

- Certificate S/N: E1BF16B93022E15F196E7C9D3834AA7D, algorithm: RSA (508 bits), issued from 28 Nop 2002 to 28 Nop 2003, for 1 host(s): *.myrealbox.com. [1] -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195

Re: Adding recepient into special Group on Address book

. in section Read Messages) with an action that does exactly what you want. Set the filter to Manual only and assign a hotkey to it at Options tab. You should be almost done. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) If you choke a smurf, what color

Re: BCC

a character :-) The sense I was trying to express was: if you _mean_ something we have to grab for our crystal balls. If you say something we'll be able to recognize it w/o guessing :-) The mistake I made was I conjugated 'mean' wrong in the fact that I missed a character (a simple typo) :-) -- Regards Peter

Re: PGP8 and The Bat.

Hi John, On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:19:47 -0800 John L Crain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't get PGP8 to work with it. Any suggestions. Our company uses PGP8 across the board and I can do manual work arounds but they are far from optimal. There's nothing but work around until a PGP-8

Re: Access Violation in xxxxx ?

these information even they will not be able to do anything about it. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/6 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Love and pain become one and the same in the eyes of a wounded child. Current version

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

be internal only, every visualization should be done without the escape characters and _of course_ the process of sending the mail has to flatten the string! Andrey: would you file a bug report, if there's not already one that deals with the subject? http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ -- Regards Peter

Re: Question about greyed out signatures

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:12:30 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been a very happt The Bat! user for only a few short weeks, and I'm trying to learn all I can about the application. My questions is, I believe, simple, yet I cannot seem to find the answer to it.

Re: BCC

Hi Eddie, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:16:00 +0100 Eddie Castelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: have you tried with an other Version such as v1.63b5 or so? Is there any reason why somebody who requests on TBUDL should give the current Beta a try _before_ anybody has stated it could have that problem

Re: BCC

Hi Mark, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:01:55 +0100 Mark Partous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MP When send such an Email (to myself, BCC to the same group) there MP is no problem. RO I don't understand what you're trying to say with this. You should try harder! Anyone can see I meant: :-) (1) When I

Re: off topic - suggested programming language?

Hi Jurgen, On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 13:42:48 +0100 Jurgen Haug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo Fledermäuse, Nice ... what do you think how (in percent of readers) understand your greeting on this list? sorry to ask here, No. You _know_ your question is off-topic, you even mark the subject acording

Re: Error message--invalid argument to date encoded

Hi Kenneth, On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:37:43 -0500 Kenneth S. Rhee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone get the error message--invalid argument for date encoded when you start the BAT? Many before ... Any possible solutions? A _working_ wolution is to delete all address book entries you've

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

is subjected here -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Yes, this is a strange craft; a strange history, too, and strange folks on board. But - nothing more. (Herman Melville) Current version

Re: Couldn't mail to an IP address directly

-- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) ... is exhibited in the radical endosemic character of the sign as such. Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http

Re: MIME Question

Hi Marck, PMFJI ... On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:56:57 + Marck D Pearlstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BF Well, any message is just a carrier for your encapsulated text, BF isn't it? Yet your text appears in the preview pane, right? BF Your comment makes it sound like the digest parts are somehow

Re: Filing filtered messages

processing with other filters at the Options tab. mM -- mM Peace Love, mM mm mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your signature delimiter is broken, it misses the final 'space' after the two dashes for being a correct delimiter recognized by a.o. The Bat!. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther

Re: MIME Question

attaching files using MIME and extracting them from incoming messages. What's you _concrete_ problem? -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) We'll kill you before you kill each other - Violent Pacification

Re: MIME Question

might be right. As non-native English speaker the difference wasn't that clear to me. But what I wanted to express was The Bat! handles MIME as defined in RFC (at most, I can't remember from the top of my head a situation The Bat! doesn't). -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows

Re: Automatic forward possible?

delivered and stored in a mail box, the forward you'll need has to be done far before the mails hits your mail box. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) One man's theology is another man's belly laugh

Re: Moving to original message

(1) and the (2) you were coming from to (1). this shortcut works multilevel, means: if you walk down a tree of messages Alt+Left will bring you up once more with every additional use. HTH -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) For all

Re: Updating backup file deletes file

/ Replacement Confirmation Message; never ever. Only because some few think it is a good idea to do so is no argument to restrict lots of others :-) -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) The universe is like a grapefruit -- it's yellow

Re: Updating backup file deletes file

the incremental changes. That way you can restore to a defined point, e.g. if you notice you've made changes you want to revert. HTH -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1) Now, Where did I put that Milk

Re: TLS with stunnel and a self-signed cert

file you've just created above. Confirm the dialog window by using OK, the contact is stored, the very next mail check you do should work, if the POP3 server name matches the value in certificates subject. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack

Re: TLS with stunnel and a self-signed cert

Windows2000 or WindowsXP. This installs a stunnel service. To uninstall this service call it 'stunnel.exe -uninstall'. Of course the stunnel.exe has to be in path or you have to be in stunnel directory for this actions. Hope this helps. -- Regards Peter Palmreuther (The Bat! v1.63 Beta/5 on Windows

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >