and the customiser, but
I don't see anything like it.
Does this option still exist? Or am I dreaming of something
else?
Thanks,
--
WL
Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
this with an
exchange account?
I've tried some incoming filters that looks at the age of the email,
but it doesn't seem to work. Once the email is collected and left
on the server, it seems TB doesn't look at it again, so the age
criteria is not properly applied.
Thanks,
--
WL
Hello, all.
I just installed 4.0.24, and trying to import my existing
email.
Is there a way to create mail folders within TB! from
the command line? Or force /export to create the folder
on the fly instead of dumping the messages into the
Inbox?
Thanks,
--
WL
assuming
it's a setting thing.
Short of uninstalling, and re-installing, is there anything
else I can look at or tweak to try to debug this?
--
WL
Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
of futzing with this. I recreated the imap account
with the exact same settings, and outgoing email works
on the newly created account. Not sure what's going on...
Now, to copy over my template settings
Thanks for the suggestions and help,
--
WL
On 5/8/07, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo WL,
On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:28:54 -0500GMT (8-5-2007, 2:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
W In the account properties, I have the smtp server using TLS.
W The port is set to 465. In the authentication button, I
W have Perform SMTP
mx.google.com ESMTP f24sm14853661pyh
[07:43:36] C: EHLO WL
[07:43:36] S: 250-mx.google.com at your service, [65.42.208.133]
[07:43:36] S: 250-SIZE 28311552
[07:43:36] S: 250-8BITMIME
[07:43:36] S: 250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN
[07:43:36] S: 250 ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
[07:43:36] C: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sorry, just a random sig test...
On 5/8/07, Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snippaged]
Sig yes? It's weird... I thought it worked
before... and emails sent to myself seem
to have the trailing space...
--
WL
Current version is 3.99
authentication required - for help go to
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/sbc/dsl/mail/pop/pop-11.html
[18:49:11] C: RSET
[18:49:11] C: QUIT
It doesn't even seem to be performing the AUTH step.
Suggestions?
--
WL
Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL
with dos line endings. This
may need to be changed by hand as well.
Address Book.app imports vcards, so that should be an
easy export from TB! as well. I don't recall if line
endings were an issue or not...
--
WL
Current version is 3.95.08 | 'Using
On 5/2/06, Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi WL,
In your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent on Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 3:42:36 AM,
you wrote:
W When I add a keyboard shortcut through the customiser,
W there is a text entry box to enter the keys. It seems off
W kilter to me.
W http
Hello, all.
This feels like a silly question, but oh well...
I just got an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] about a bug that
is fixed in version 3.81.01.
Where would I find it? It doesn't seem to be listed on the
main download page (3.80.03) , nor the beta page (3.80.01).
Thanks,
--
WL
/shortcut_menu_off_kilter.png
Just wondering if other people see the same thing as I do.
Thanks,
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
.
Currently, I do not have the Use Large Fonts enabled. I tried
restarting TB! with Large Fonts enabled and disabled with
similar results.
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
.
[...]
Why doesn't my TB! obey the Confirm B4 Send demand I make?
Is it possible that the ``small Explorer Window'' is
actually the confirmation window?
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
they are the
same (and they are).
What does TB! use to determine if 2 emails are duplicates
of each other?
Thanks,
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
which account it came
from. I do this for the ticker view, as well.
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
=flowed display. Now, it just has do
utf-8 encoding...
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
the characters correctly
with utf-8. My preference, however, would be to use microed with utf-8.
Any ideas?
--
WL
Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
.
--
WL
Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
, but it is not sufficient. WMF files are
recognized by a special header and the extension is not
needed. The files could arrive using any extension, or
embeded in Word or other documents.
--
WL
Current version is 3.64.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information
those accounts.
I've been using this setup for about 3 or 4 months now,
and I haven't had to force quit TB. Whee
--
WL
Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
email, and I do not use a local virus
scanner. Dispather dealt with it, though. When I examined
the packet traffic, it seemed TB got stuck on some headers.
Probably some mime header exploit that affected TB as well.
I haven't had this happen since I restarted using TB, though.
--
WL
try folder maintenance and see the
results.
Well, I hope that works for you. The thing that bugs me is TB!'s insistence
on counting all my emails on startup. Massive drive thrashing...
Is there any way of getting TB! to cache this data or delay this activity
or something like that?
--
WL
subjects. I can input or paste in japanese words,
but they become a series of when I send the email,
or if I click through the header portion of the message
editor. I've been working around this by hand encoding
the subject and then pasting it into the email.
--
WL
On 9/29/05, Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello WL everyone else,
on 29-Sep-2005 at 21:07 you (WL) wrote:
These are all problems with non-ascii characters in the header;
specifically, non-ascii characters in the subject are not handled very
well.
Even though TheBat
several emails
in the archives. However, I cannot seem to find this item. Does
it still exist?
WL
--
.
Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
, September 7th, 2004, at 08:47:55 GMT +09:00 (IRKST)
(at the same time
it was 07/09/2004, 02:47:55 my local time), you wrote (at least in part):
W Specifically, will there be support for unicode in version 3?
It will be added as soon as possible.
WL
sure ``Purge Unread messages'' is checked.
WL
--
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello, all.
I've sent some bug reports, as well as requests
for information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the Help - feedback email).
I don't think I've ever gotten any sort of acknowledgement
before. Has anybody gotten any kind of response from these
2 email addresses?
WL
setting
the days to 1 but still nothing gets removed.
This is true in 3, beta 6 7. Bug or feature?
I'm still on v2, so this may be different, etc. Make sure
the Account Property - Mail Management - Deletion
``Purge Unread messages'' is checked.
WL
unicode characters are displaying correctly.
WL
--
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
that are very,
very long that crashes some email clients out there. Is there
such a limit to TheBat? Who knows...I did send a 900 character
line once, and it seems ok.
WL
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com
Saturday, September 20, 2003, 11:14:00 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:37:59 -0500 GMT (21/09/2003, 05:37 +0700 GMT),
TF WL wrote:
I've recreated folder, check the integrity; any suggestions
on how to debug this?
TF This should be fixed in the current version. I suggest
/exceeding messages, TB reports
that there is nothing to do as well. The other folders seem
ok...just this one.
I've recreated folder, check the integrity; any suggestions
on how to debug this?
WL
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information
Is there a way to make the maintenance centre settings ``stick''
between runs? It's nice that I can choose which folders to purge,
etc, but not so nice if I have to reselect the same folders every
time.
WL
Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL
can't tell if a
particular piece of mail is read or not.
For TheBat users who synch with their palm pilot: how are
the emails handled? What is the filter strategy that works?
WL
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http
the changes.
RM not being able to take my e-mails with me on road. If theBat! added
RM the ability to Sync, Outlook would lose any comparison, hands down.
yup...TB is nice, and synching would be icing...
WL
RM I would also be willing to pay for this extra functionality even as an
RM addon
downloaded, but have no other particulars at
this point. It seems all the messages are downloaded
correctly, though.
At first, I thought it was related to the virtual
desktop thingie I was playing with, but if somebody
else is reporting a similar problem...
WL
the email detection.
WL
DK --
DK Dave Kennedy
DK
DK Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
DK http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL
process
Does TheBat have this kind of functionality?
WL
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
?
WL
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
can have TB use
references (if available), then by subject. Is this
possible?
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
WL
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL
Monday, June 16, 2003, 4:34:10 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
BM On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
BM I believe that's already handled.
yeah...it does work as advertised
44 matches
Mail list logo