Re: [T/N: C7DF0A92]:

2021-07-09 Thread MAU
Hello Ian, > Just wondering how to add a custom dictionary for spell checking? I > can;t seem to find where to create one. Are you using SSCE dictionaries? ) know I created one some 9 or 10 years ago but, right now, I don't have the slightest idea of how I did it. -- Best regards, Miguel

Re: [T/N: CDD1A1F6]: Yahoo mail via POP

2021-06-29 Thread Lore Galore
Hello Ian, Tuesday, June 29, 2021, 1:19:49 AM, you wrote: > G'day, > Ok, I figured it out. > The Bat! is considered an "insecure app" by Yahoo and so needs a separate > password to be able to use it from the POP3 server, whereas MailWasher is > seen as a secure app! > So, work your way

Re: [T/N: F1FB303C]: Show message tabs????

2021-06-21 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ian, On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:04:03 +1000 GMT (21-Jun-21, 12:04 +0700 GMT), Ian A. White wrote: >>> How do I turn the message tabs back on? TF>> I am not sure whether this is what you mean: TF>> Main Menu: Workspace / Folder Tabs / [X] Show folder tabs > Not quite, but it pointed me in

Re: [T/N: F1FB303C]: Show message tabs????

2021-06-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Ian, On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 23:17:24 +1000 GMT (20-Jun-21, 20:17 +0700 GMT), Ian A. White wrote: > It's been a LONG day. ;-) > I have to call it quits for tonight as it is heading for midnight. > While trying to get rid of the quick reply window, I saw a tool tip to "Hide > Message Tabs.

Re: [T/N: 7232C0F3]: Upgrading The Bat!

2021-06-20 Thread Ian A. White
Sorry, I prepared it as a plain text message but had to resend it and when I edited the message, the old quirk of changing the format back to HTML kicked back in and I forgot to switch it back. -- Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re: [T/N: 7232C0F3]: Upgrading The Bat!

2021-06-20 Thread Ian A. White
Title: Re: [T/N: 7232C0F3]: Upgrading The Bat! G'day Richard, Apologies for the way this comes through, but while the upgrade has gone through without a hitch as far as my message base and filters are concerned, my message templates have become horribly screwed up, hence the poor format

Re: [T/N: 7232C0F3]: Upgrading The Bat!

2021-06-19 Thread Richard Newman via TBUDL
Hello Ian, > I need to preserve the existing message database and apart from a  > separate copy of the messages and then doing Backup through the Tools  > menu, is there any thing I need to do? In addition to the TB internal backup of your message database and settings, I would do a full backup

Re: [T/N: 2EA9557A]: Unable to contact RitLabs

2021-03-17 Thread Marck
On 17 March 2021 at 11:35 Ian A. White wrote and made these points >... IAW> So please, what mail server do I need to use? Do I use IAW> c4s4-4e-syd.hosting-services.net.au or mail.wai.com.au, and when will IAW> those settings become perational? I would suggest that you move away from a

Re: [T/N: 2EA9557A]: Unable to contact RitLabs

2021-03-17 Thread Marck Pearlstone
On 17 March 2021 at 05:11 Ian A. White wrote and made these points IAW> I am having some issues and thought I'd post a message on the RITLabs IAW> forum on their web page. ... IAW> How do I contact someone there? They are present on these support lists and may have seen your message. You

Re: [T/N: 66B196C9]: Upgrading procedure

2019-06-01 Thread Paul Berger
Hello TBUDL@thebat., Saturday, June 1, 2019, 9:09:59 PM, you wrote: IAW> G'day, IAW> Hope this is OK to post here. IAW> As you can see, I am using a rather old version of The Bat! I did have IAW> a discount coupon, however with a few things going on at the moment, I IAW> put things off until

Re[2]: [T/N: 5E5340E0]: Problem with Root Certificate

2015-07-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
7/14/2015 7:45 AM Hi Ian, On 7/13/2015 Ian A. White wrote: IAW What complicates matters is that my web host sold out to one company, IAW and then that company sold out to another. It was the first company IAW that switched servers and no one now knows how, why or what was done. I once

Re[2]: [T/N: 5E5340E0]: Problem with Root Certificate

2015-07-14 Thread Paul Van Noord
7/14/2015 7:30 PM Hi Ian, On 7/14/2015 Ian A. White wrote: IAW What I did was search for a RapidSSL certificate (as this is what the IAW log showed. One of the links had what looks like a hex dump of a IAW certificate. I did a copy and paste into a file and gave it a crt IAW extension. THe

Re: [T/N: 5E5340E0]: Problem with Root Certificate

2015-07-13 Thread MFPA
Hi On Tuesday 14 July 2015 at 2:44:15 AM, in mid:1359700093.20150714114...@wai.com.au, Ian A. White wrote: The first link said the it was already installed as a certificate authority. How would your browser know whether or not you had this certificate in The Bat!'s Trusted Root CA

Re: [T/N: 5E5340E0]: Problem with Root Certificate

2015-07-13 Thread Rick
I tried them all, but no luck. Did you try importing them into the address book? That is where they go and I didn't mention it in the first email Current version is 6.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: [T/N: 5E5340E0]: Problem with Root Certificate

2015-07-12 Thread Rick
How do I rectify the situation? I have tried to search for a solution, but generally end up nowhere. I've spent the best part of a week trying to get my web host to resolve it, but they say they have tested it and it is OK. Of course it would be OK as they are using a matched set of

Re: [n]

2006-09-16 Thread MFPA
Hi On Wednesday 13 September 2006 at 11:38:54 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Munson wrote: Account/properties/reply/use reply numbering in subject or %SingleRe in reply templates as required -- Best regards, MFPA The second mouse gets the cheese Using

Re: [n]

2006-09-14 Thread Paul Jansen
Julian, Go to Account Properties for the account(s) in question. Go down to Templates, then Reply (you may need to expand the Templates list to see this) and uncheck the checkbox second up from the bottom - Use reply numbering in subject line. Thanks, There's always more to learn about The

Re: [n]

2006-09-13 Thread Paul Jansen
Dear All, How can I turn off the number in [] after the the Re when replying to messages. It seems to be messing up the threading for people not using The Bat and I would like to have the choice whether to use this facility or not. Thanks -- PJ Using TB! v3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1.2600

Re: [n]

2006-09-13 Thread Terry Munson
Hello Paul, Account/properties/reply/use reply numbering in subject -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP Service Pack 2 2600 Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: [n]

2006-09-13 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 11:17:16 PM, Paul Jansen wrote: How can I turn off the number in [] after the the Re when replying to messages. It seems to be messing up the threading for people not using The Bat and I would like to have the choice whether to use this facility or not. Go

Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-11-23 Thread MAU
Hello all, In folder properties one can set for how long to keep messages. TB's help says: ,- [ Keep messages in the base for n days ] | The maximum age of a message allowed in the message base. If a message | is older than this, it will be automatically deleted from the message | base

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-11-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Mau, @23-Nov-2003, 19:39 +0100 (23-Nov 18:39 UK time) MAU [M] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: M ,- [ Keep messages in the base for n days ] M | The maximum age of a message allowed in the message base. If a message M | is older than this, it will be automatically deleted from the message M

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-11-23 Thread MAU
Hello Marck, I have evidence of a message with a creation date in 1998 that doesn't yet fit the 30 day retention criteria. So TB is clearly using received date for purging information. Thanks for the confirmation :) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat!

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-16 Thread MAU
Hello Peter, Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of range as deleted, and with the next Purge and compress they will be actually deleted. PR It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient. Why is that? My previous MUA had that capability. While there was at least one message in a

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-16 Thread MAU
Hello Thomas, I have set the expiration to 180 days. Haven't found a mailing-list thread that ran longer than that... ;-) I set most my mailing list to just 15 or 30 days at the most. My message base would be huge if I set these to 180 days. As I say in my reply to Peter Meyns, I found this

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-16 Thread MAU
Hello Stefan, Then you should park the threads you are interested in. This way, messages won't get deleted by purging. No, parking is not the solution for what Paul (and others like me) is looking for. Parking is the solution if I want to keep the thread for ever (or a very long time), but

Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Paul Richardson
If this setting is exceeded, will TB split an existing thread, removing those that exceed it and keeping those that do not? Nothing in the Help file again. -- Paul Richardson Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Paul, on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:38:44 +0100GMT (15.08.03, 21:38 +0200GMT here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : PR If this setting is exceeded, will TB split an existing thread, PR removing those that exceed it and keeping those that do not? Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Paul Richardson
Peter Meyns wrote: Yes, indeed. It will mark the messages out of range as deleted, and with the next Purge and compress they will be actually deleted. TVM It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient. -- Paul Richardson Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Paul Richardson
Peter Meyns wrote: Why is that? TBH, I suppose mainly because my previous e-mail client did not split threads in this way; it wouldn't delete until the last message passed the sell-by date. If I want to save a thread, I copy it to my archive folder, and let the mailing list continue its

Re[2]: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] Paul, PR It strikes me this could be somewhat inconvenient. Then you should park the threads you are interested in. This way, messages won't get deleted by purging. - -- Regards, Stefan ...Blessed is the

Re: Keep messages in the base for n days

2003-08-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:19:54 +0100 GMT (16/08/2003, 04:19 +0700 GMT), Paul Richardson wrote: you could set your list folder to not expire messages at all Better, IMO. Then I could copy or delete the entire thread manually. I have set the expiration to 180 days. Haven't found a

Auto-save every N sec feature

2003-04-04 Thread Mark Knipfer
In The Bat! 1.63i when I go to Options | Editor Preferences | General there is this setting: Auto-save every [0 ] sec Is this setting for saving a message that you are composing every N seconds? If yes, where does it save the message you are composing? When I click Help in the Editor

Re: Auto-save every N sec feature

2003-04-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, April 5, 2003, 00:48, Mark Knipfer wrote: Is this setting for saving a message that you are composing every N seconds? Yes. If yes, where does it save the message you are composing? To the outbox, as a draft. Great feature IMHO. -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat

Re: Auto-save every N sec feature

2003-04-04 Thread Mark Knipfer
On Friday, April 4, 2003, 5:51:24 PM, you wrote: On Saturday, April 5, 2003, 00:48, Mark Knipfer wrote: Is this setting for saving a message that you are composing every N seconds? Yes. If yes, where does it save the message you are composing? To the outbox, as a draft. Great feature

Re: Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-12 Thread Chris Lilley
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 4:25:15 PM, Lars wrote: LG Hi Chris, LG On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 at 16:12:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote: CL I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I send mail CL to, so would like to switch it off. Any hints? LG Yes. Go to the Account properties -

Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Lilley
Hello there, Is there some configuration setting, or something I can put in a template, that avoids generating the Re[2]: format and generates the regular Re: format for replies instead? I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I send mail to, so would like to switch it off.

Re: Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-10 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 16:12, Chris Lilley wrote: Is there some configuration setting, or something I can put in a template, that avoids generating the Re[2]: format and generates the regular Re: format for replies instead? I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I

Re: Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-10 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Chris, On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 at 16:12:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote: CL I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I send mail CL to, so would like to switch it off. Any hints? Yes. Go to the Account properties - Templates - Reply and uncheck Use reply numbering in the subject

Re: Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-10 Thread John Phillips
Hello Chris You wrote On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, at 16:12:47 [GMT +0200] (00:12 Thursday where I live):- Is there some configuration setting, or something I can put in a template, that avoids generating the Re[2]: format and generates the regular Re: format for replies instead? In your

Re: Getting rid of Re[n]:

2002-04-10 Thread Luc
Good evening Chris, It was foretold that on 10-4-2002 @ 16:12:47 GMT+0200 (which was 16:12 where I live) Chris Lilley wrote and spread these wise comments on Getting rid of Re[n]:: snipped a bit CL Is there some configuration setting, or something I can put in a CL template, that avoids

Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread nick . panienski
Hi, as you can see my sig is just --\n, although I correctly put -- \n in my 'new message' template. What am I doing wrong?? (Using TB 1.53d) Bye Nick -- / Nick Panienski - GfD IT-Kommunikation / Dipl. Ing. Informationstechnik (BA) IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email is confidential, may

Re: Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello nick, 21. januar 2002, 12:15:55, you wrote: npod as you can see my sig is just --\n, although I correctly put npod -- \n in my 'new message' template. What am I doing wrong?? npod (Using TB 1.53d) Type dashdashspaceenter in the template. Even though it will not look like

Re[2]: Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread nick . panienski
Hallo Jernej and Brano, JS Type dashdashspaceenter in the template. Even though it will JS not look like there is a space at the end, there will be (just don't JS fiddle with the -- line after that). Thats what Ive done, putting the cursor to the beginning of the line and pressing 'end' will

Re: Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread Carsten Thnges
Hi Nick, npod (PS, I just manually put a space down there :) hm, maybe your mail server or virus scanner steals your spaces... ? | Received: from komm-npa.gfd.de ([10.112.100.36]) by Notes-Fax1.obi.de (Lotus Domino | Release 5.0.3 (Intl)) with ESMTP id 2002012113224853:62361 ; Mon, 21 Jan |

Re[3]: Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread Jernej Simoni
Hello nick, 21. januar 2002, 13:22:45, you wrote: npod Thats what Ive done, putting the cursor to the beginning of the line npod and pressing 'end' will put the cursor correctly after dashdashspace, npod so there definatly is a dashdashspacenewline. I actually didnt want to npod use external

Re[4]: Signature -- \n Problem

2002-01-21 Thread nick . panienski
Hallo Jernej, JS End will always miss the last space. Select with mouse, and you'll see JS it. You missunderstood me, in the 'Templates' 'End' really stops behind the space. I just created a draft, seeing that in my drafts the space is not missing. So this really must be a problem of our smtp

stupid registration question ( y/N=no ) at least i got 59 more versions at least. ;o)

2000-01-31 Thread phil
R hth €•—š ÛÛv2.00 ÛÛv1.41 how much is 1ea v2.x + 1.x discount = ? -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL

it works .. i think (was : How to suppress the S/N)

1999-12-31 Thread Rob
Hello all, on Wed, 22 Dec 1999, at 22:57:15 local time (GMT +0300), Andrew wrote: Sure. You have to use some program for that (a kind of "transparent" SMTP server - you tell The Bat to use it as your SMTP server and to that program - to use your real SMTP server). I've heard about VPOP.

Re: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-30 Thread Rob
Hello all, on Fri, 24 Dec 1999, at 23:43:42 local time (GMT -0700), Keith wrote: I, too, would like a translation or a brief readme. Alex Sanyukovitch, the author, put an an english readme on : http://members.tripod.co.uk/xraysoft -- Rob ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) using The Bat! 1.38e ... Go

RE: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-29 Thread Rob
[re: Maillita] I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch. yep, i noticed that too. some filenames in the package are Dutch. also the Maillita homepage was with a Dutch provider (dds.nl). I wouldnt mind having a go

Re[2]: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-29 Thread tracer
Hello Rob, On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 14:54:17 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, December 29, 1999, 8:54:17 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Rob wrote: Rob [re: Maillita] I had a quick look and while I am buzy fixing up 3 computers I did notice that the guy who wrote it must be Dutch. Rob

Re[2]: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-25 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
, if anyone will be interested in it by that time. -- Best regards, Andrewmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.38e S/N E9230B5C under Russian Windows 98 4.10 Build A on an AMD-K5-133 with 32Mb EDO 60ns RAM and Samsung WNR-31601A 1.6Gb hard disk

RE: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-24 Thread Rob
Another program is X-Ray (http://xraysoft.cjb.net/) do you know if there's a translation of whatever the readme.txt of that package is written in ?? (i guess it's Russian ...) -- -- View the TBUDL archive at

Re: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-23 Thread tracer
Hello Andrew K. Lovetski, On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 22:57:15 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, December 23, 1999, 2:57:15 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote: Andrew Hello, The Bat Users! AM So, after all this. Is there a way to suppress the serial number? write the

Re: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-23 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello Listmembers, On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote: ^^^ You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December? Regards Dieter ...Don't stop at one bug. |Running TheBat! 1.38e [reg] on | |Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6| -- Dieter

Re: How to suppress the S/N - was - Re[2]: privacy

1999-12-23 Thread Ali Martin
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:54:55 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 at 00:12:40 [GMT +0500] Denis V. Petelin wrote: ^^^ You don't accept Y2K _this_ end of December? Sorting messages by received time, to the rescue. : -- Ali Martin |

Re: feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

1999-09-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, September 22, 1999, 3:53:42 PM, lowlevel wrote: I would like to move a mail-folder(-tree!) by simply dragging it to the right place, instead of having to re-create them (all). This is very cubersome.. ALT/CNTL LMB-drags are what you're looking for. -- Steve C.

Re: feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

1999-09-22 Thread Claude
Hi, all, On 23/09/1999, at 00:53, lowlevel (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) took a mike and sang on a blues tempo: l Greetings, l lowlevel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Just press ALT, then drag as you wish. -- Best regards, Claude. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought of