New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

2005-06-22 Thread WilWilWil
Io, When I move a mail from a folder to another, the list of mails is not refresh, so the mail just moved steel appears in the list. It's not all the time but often. Especially if the mail is not read flagged ! It's truth when the move is done with menu or key shortcut or drag'ndrop... Do you

Re: New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

2005-06-22 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil everyone else, on 22-Jun-2005 at 21:28 you (WilWilWil) wrote: Do you have this problem ? No, I never noticed this. Is this an IMAP or a POP (local) folder? Did you try a folder maintenance? -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) To witness

Re: New bug on refresh list of mail after moving one of them to an other folder...

2005-06-22 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello WilWilWil, When I move a mail from a folder to another, the list of mails is not refresh, so the mail just moved steel appears in the list. It's not all the time but often. Especially if the mail is not read flagged ! It's truth when the move is done with menu or key shortcut or

Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

2005-06-10 Thread Dragan \Mac\ Ruzic
Hello again! Seing the post Moving the Bat! data files to another computer I've just realized that this must be the best place to wonder about the same thing - but now from my PC to a Mac. I suppose that I'll need to export each of the main folders like inbox, sent mail and some

Re: Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

2005-06-10 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dragan, Friday, June 10, 2005, 8:52:45 PM, you wrote: DMR When moving mail, and this is where this idea came up - one way DMR could be that I export from TheBat DMR mail to Outlook first and then use Outlook2Mail to move _everything_. Don't know if this can help you: http

Re: Moving mail from TheBat to Mac help please

2005-06-10 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Friday, June 10, 2005, 20:52:45, Dragan Mac Ruzic wrote: Now, selecting Inbox and going to Tools/Export... I've got three choices, which one to chose? Unix Mailbox - it's a standard format that almost all mail software supports. -- Jernej Simoncic http://deepthought.ena.si/ Any fool

Re[2]: Moving the Bat! data files to another computer

2005-06-09 Thread Nick OHare
Hello Chris, Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 12:40:48 AM, you wrote: C Nick OHare @ 2005-Jun-7 7:19:04 PM C Moving the Bat! data files to another computer C mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using The Bat! v3.0.1 and need to move it to a new computer. I have the registration key but need to know which

Moving the Bat! data files to another computer

2005-06-07 Thread Nick OHare
Hi All, Arghh! This is a stupid question since I have done it before (although with a earlier version). I'm using The Bat! v3.0.1 and need to move it to a new computer. I have the registration key but need to know which files to transfer over so that The Bat! recognizes all my previous

Re: Moving the Bat! data files to another computer

2005-06-07 Thread Chris
Nick OHare @ 2005-Jun-7 7:19:04 PM Moving the Bat! data files to another computer mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm using The Bat! v3.0.1 and need to move it to a new computer. I have the registration key but need to know which files to transfer over so that The Bat! recognizes all my previous

Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Dwight A Corrin
Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5. I have common folders nested as many as 3 or 4 layers deep. I wanted to move a folder from 2nd level into a different primary catagory on 3rd level. This would have been a simple operation

Re: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread MAU
Hello Dwight, Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5. Works here just fine. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.5 Current version

Re: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:00:25 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote: Doesn't seem to be a problem here. But, are you ALT-LMB-ing on the icon or or the name? ALT-LMB-ing on the icon won't work (here), on the name it will. You are correct. That seems like odd behavior too, but better than what I

Re: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Peter, Sorry to hijack, but I tried replying to your PM Peter and it bounced back, twice. Any ideas why. -- Best regards, Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.5 Bayes Filter Plugin v2.0.2 On Windows 2000 5.0 Build #2195

Re[2]: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Vili
DAC Time was when you could hold down the ALT key and drag folders. That DAC doesn't seem to work any more with 3.5. PO Doesn't seem to be a problem here. PO But, are you ALT-LMB-ing on the icon or or the name? PO ALT-LMB-ing on the icon won't work (here), on the name it will. Be careful with

Re: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Dwight DAC Each time you punch the three buttons, you manage to move the folder one DAC step. When you get to the end of the group where it is nested, you have to DAC move it out to the level of the next group. then you can jump to the bottom DAC of the next group, and when you get to the

Re: Moving Folders Around in Account Tree

2005-05-19 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, 8:26:45 PM, Natasha V Pearce wrote: I know others have already answered this from a GUI perspective, but for those interested in the keyboard specifics... TB! allows you to press Move Out at any time to move your folder out one level, then you only need to use Move

Re: Filter: read message moving to folder does not work any more when the folder is moved

2004-11-07 Thread MAU
Hello Edgar, Will this change? I thought it was a nice thing that you could move a folder and the program could still find it. M This is due to a bug discovered after 3.0 was released. It was already M fixed in one of the post-release betas. Now I'm on 1.33 but it still does not change it.

Re: Filter: read message moving to folder does not work any more when the folder is moved

2004-11-06 Thread Edgar van Dijk
Hello MAU, On Saturday, September 18, 2004, 10:20:16 AM, you wrote: Will this change? I thought it was a nice thing that you could move a folder and the program could still find it. M This is due to a bug discovered after 3.0 was released. It was already M fixed in one of the post-release

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Anthony, On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:27:02 +0200 GMT (23/10/2004, 13:27 +0700 GMT), Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right? Pal, with statements that ridiculous AGA I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along AGA the lines of

Re[2]: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-24 Thread finalcut
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski On 24.October.2004, 1:50 AM (Now: 24.October.2004, 8:54 PM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It didn't work for the shuttle. AGA It did work for the shuttle; but someone decided to skip a few steps. lol -- The Final Cut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thebat: 3.0.2.1

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Alexander S. Kunz writes: Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there, so I'll just stop here... :-) I used to do technical support, and that's a standard question, along the lines of have you

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else 23-Okt-2004 08:27, you wrote: That's why pilots have checklists The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats going on... :) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using v3.0.2.1 on Windows

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004, @ @ at 19:35:34 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote to Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else, therefore including Me as well: Hello Anthony

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Alexander S. Kunz writes: The average techsupp person has checklists to annoy callers who know whats going on... :) The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they are doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what they are doing. Not going through the

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Sat, 23 Oct 2004, @ @ at 23:03:43 +0200, when Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: It works for NASA; it will work for everyone else. It didn't work for the shuttle. - -- Mica PGP key

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, October 23, 2004 at 4:03:43 PM [GMT -0500], Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: The vast majority of callers to tech support don't know what they are doing, and there's no way to tell which callers _do_ know what they are doing. Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Mica Mijatovic writes: It didn't work for the shuttle. It did work for the shuttle; but someone decided to skip a few steps. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-23 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Allie Martin writes: Well, in a way I'd disagree with that. It's not easy for a novice to give detailed and technical information with explanations that imply knowledge that exceeds that of the novice. :) In such a situation, one can easily raise the tech support level. Typically no one

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-22 Thread Michael Wilson
-Original Message- From: Alexander S. Kunz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Oct 21, 2004 8:39 AM To: Michael L. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote: I know this and say

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-22 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Michael Wilson writes: I was software QA. My job was to setup new systems and see what happened to the registry and temp files area after installing third party items. I was in several meetings where memos from Hard Drive comapnies were used by programmers to purposly not delete temp and old

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-22 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Michael Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 18:38, you wrote: Windows XP is the best and most stable, as hard drive size increases have virtually stopped. Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has *never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-22 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Alexander S. Kunz writes: Uhm. I beg to differ, my experience is vastly different. HDD usage has *never* increased more during daily usage than with Win XP. My system partition (without additional programs - I have the program files on a different partition) for XP is 4GB; after installation

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-22 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski everyone else 22-Okt-2004 19:43, you wrote: You do empty the Recycle Bin occasionally, right? Pal, with statements that ridiculous I don't dare continuing this OT conversation, sorry. I mean... no, I don't mean... you haven't been there, so I'll just stop here...

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-21 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote: I know this and say this because I worked for 16 years in Redmond Washington, for Microsoft Since we remember (from the days of *that* signature of yours *g*) that you are a teacher, critic and ecclesiastic (sp?)

Re[2]: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-21 Thread Charles Canato
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 7:03:18 PM, you wrote: AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try AGA to edit

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-21 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 21 Oct 2004, @ @ at 17:39:19 +0200, when Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Hello Michael L. Wilson everyone else 21-Okt-2004 00:03, you wrote: I know this and say this because I

Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try to edit the filters, until I stop and restart TB. Nothing is corrupted and

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread finalcut
Hello Anthony G. Atkielski On 20.October.2004, 3:14 PM (Now: 20.October.2004, 3:50 PM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had this bug with the same version that you have right now I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB! Uh, I only upgraded to this version six days ago. Do I have to upgrade this product once a day, or what? I've also noticed that this problem may be

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] everyone else 20-Okt-2004 21:51, you wrote: AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I

Re[2]: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread finalcut
Hello Alexander S. Kunz On 20.October.2004, 4:19 PM (Now: 20.October.2004, 4:21 PM), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ASK Ahem... Anthony is using 3.0.1.33 which *is* the latest stable release ASK version, the only more recent version is 3.0.2.1 (which is a beta), and the ASK stability of that release

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Anthony, old message... AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try AGA to edit the filters, until I

Re[2]: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Martin Webster
Michael Wilson [MLW], wrote: AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message attached. Access violations then occur each time I try AGA to edit the filters, until I

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Anthony, On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:14:48 +0200GMT (20-10-2004, 21:14 +0200, where I live), you wrote: AGA When I create a new rule and try to move it with Alt and the mouse, if I AGA slip it downwards instead of upwards, I usually get an access violation, AGA like the message attached. What

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Wed 20-Oct-04 2:51pm -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had this bug with the same version that you have right now I suggest you to upgrade to a more recent version of TB! He has the latest version of TB! I certainly wouldn't recommend that buggy beta to anyone not on the beta list - I've

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Roelof Otten writes: What happens when you try to move the filter with the up and down arrows in the toolbar? I haven't tried it. Next time I'll try that and see what happens. I don't create new rules very often. -- Anthony __ Using The Bat!

Re: Access violation when moving folders for rules

2004-10-20 Thread Anthony G. Atkielski
Michael L. Wilson writes: I would like to speak a little about operating system stability and the Bat!. The Bat is written in a very high level language that does not touch deep operating system problems. Since the Bat! only works on Windows machines, people really need to look to their OS

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-19 Thread Eric
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:09:30 -0400 GMT(18/10/2004, 23:09 + GMT), Chris wrote: 6C Quoting when replying to this message is good for your C karma. Then I'll just quote that and say thanks to Chris and Michael :-) -- Eric Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1

Re[2]: Moving to version 3

2004-10-19 Thread MFPA
Hi On Monday, 18 October, 2004, at 4:08:00 AM, Chris wrote: Excuse the language, but things would go to hell for administrators if normal users could install programs willy nilly. Which is why the Admin account would be password-protected... -- Best regards, MFPA

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-18 Thread Eric
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:42:34 -0400 GMT(17/10/2004, 22:42 + GMT), Chris wrote: 6C Check out this script, which will temporarily raise your C account to administrator status. C http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/archive/2004/07/24/193721.aspx C After running that, you can open Explorer and

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-18 Thread Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric @ 2004-Oct-18 1:50:48 PM Moving to version 3 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sure it will - if I get it to work: it looks rather complicated Nope. Just edit the MakeMeAdmin.cmd file and change one of the values to be the username of your local

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Eric
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:16:02 -0500 GMT(13/10/2004, 20:16 + GMT), Mary Bull wrote: 6MB Look in The Bat! directory, and under each account, MB re-name the .sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. I was totally confused by previous conflicting statements about just what files need renaming.

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eric! On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 9:29 AM, you wrote: 6MB Look in The Bat! directory, and under each account, MB re-name the .sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. Dyslexic typo. Should have written: .srb files ... NOT--REPEAT--NOT the .srx files E I was totally confused by

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Eric
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:39:24 -0500 GMT(17/10/2004, 15:39 + GMT), Mary Bull wrote: 6MB Look in The Bat! directory, and under each account, MB re-name the .sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. MB Dyslexic typo. Should have written: MB .srb files ... NOT--REPEAT--NOT the .srx files

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eric! On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 12:52 PM, you wrote: E Which has got me even more confused, I'm afraid to say, as E there don't appear to be any *.srb files in my directory E for The Bat! Then you have no problem whatsoever. That just means that, so far, you have not run a version

Re[2]: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Eric, Sunday, October 17, 2004, 12:52:12 PM, you wrote: 6MB Look in The Bat! directory, and under each account, MB re-name the .sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. MB Dyslexic typo. Should have written: MB .srb files ... NOT--REPEAT--NOT the .srx files E Which has got me even

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Eric
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:04:24 -0500 GMT(17/10/2004, 19:04 + GMT), Mary Bull wrote: 6MB Then you have no problem whatsoever. Thanks - it looks like it :-) The only irritation was that the installation file didn't seem to show an option to 'Run as ..', so I had to log off, restart as

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Chris
Eric @ 2004-Oct-17 3:21:02 PM Moving to version 3 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The only irritation was that the installation file didn't seem to show an option to 'Run as ..', so I had to log off, restart as administrator, do the installation, tell it I didn't want to create a new account, close

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Eric! On Sunday, October 17, 2004, 2:21 PM, you wrote: MB Then you have no problem whatsoever. E Thanks - it looks like it :-) I'm sorry. Should have said, in regard to The Bat!'s automatically created filter file. I'm really very new at all these things, and I don't know my way around

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-17 Thread Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mary Bull @ 2004-Oct-17 8:33:25 PM Moving to version 3 mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E The only irritation was that the installation file didn't seem to E show an option to 'Run as ..', so I had to log off, restart as E administrator, do the installation

Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Eric
Dear TBUDL members, In the light of recent comments on this list, I've decided to risk buying and moving to version 3, home edition. In the flood of messages, I suspect there has been some advice on how to upgrade - and what things will need changing (such as filters?). I assume I should do

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread admin
Dear TBUDL members, In the light of recent comments on this list, I've decided to risk buying and moving to version 3, home edition. In the flood of messages, I suspect there has been some advice on how to upgrade - and what things will need changing (such as filters?). I assume I should

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread sacksa
] 10/13/2004 01:13 PM Please respond to tbudl To: Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Moving to version 3 Dear TBUDL members, In the light of recent comments on this list, I've decided to risk buying and moving to version 3, home edition. In the flood

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Gerard
ON Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 8:13:27 PM, you wrote: aacu I just did a full backup. Closed TB. Double-clicked the .msi file and aacu there I was - all working. Same here and with a lot of filters. Some needed a little tweaking. Never needed the backup. :-) -- Best regards, Gerard

Re: [the_bat] Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Michael Acklin
Hello sacksa, Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 1:21:38 PM, you wrote: Don't you also want to turn off any firewalls and AV applications before installing the upgrade? If so, how does one turn off the firewall that comes with SP2? Go to control panel, and double click on the Windows Firewall.

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Avi! On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 1:21 PM, you wrote: scc Don't you also want to turn off any firewalls and AV applications scc before installing the upgrade? If so, how does one turn off the scc firewall that comes with SP2? C:/Program Files/Accessories/System Tools/Security Center I

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Gerard
ON Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 8:21:38 PM, you wrote: scc Don't you also want to turn off any firewalls and AV applications before scc installing the upgrade? If so, how does one turn off the firewall that scc comes with SP2? Hi sacksa, Why would you want to turn of the firewall? There is

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi sacksa, on Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:21:38 -0500GMT, you wrote: scc Don't you also want to turn off any firewalls and AV applications before scc installing the upgrade? Why would I? Au contraire! If TB! contained a virus, I would want to know... B-) Of course I'll have to accept the new TB! exe in

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Allie Martin
Sacksa, [S] wrote: Don't you also want to turn off any firewalls and AV applications before installing the upgrade? If so, how does one turn off the firewall that comes with SP2? Call me reckless, but I've never disabled any of these while upgrading TB! throughout all my years of using it.

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread sacksa
Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/13/2004 at 02:16 PM wrote: Look in The Bat! directory, and under each account, re-name the .sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. This has helped some people carry their filters across more easily. Thanks, Mary! Please elaborate re the file re-naming.

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Jeff Gaines
Hello Group On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 7:08:53 PM, wrote: Dear TBUDL members, [snip] Anything else I need to know/do? Please do state what ought to be the obvious! Thanks in advance, Be careful if you don't have the current version in C:\Program Files - the installer defaults to

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Thorvald Neumann
Hæ! Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 21:54, Allie Martin wrote: Call me reckless, but I've never disabled any of these while upgrading TB! throughout all my years of using it. I've never had any calamities either while upgrading. TB!'s installation is straightforward enough to not make this

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Avi! On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 2:42 PM, you wrote: MBLook in The Bat! directory, and under each account, re-name the MB.sbr files. NOT--repeat--NOT the .sbx files. Sorry. Should have written .srb and .srx MBThis has helped some people carry their filters across more easily. scc

Re: Moving to version 3

2004-10-13 Thread Allie Martin
Thorvald Neumann, [TN] wrote: Seconded. I never ever turn off any security measures... and TB has always been installed without errors... To add. All my upgrades have involved a simple install of the new version on top of the previous. This includes major upgrades. Again, never had problems

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASK I'd say it depends on where - in a mailing list folder you'll mostly ASK have threaded messages, anyway, but in your personal inbox its ASK difficult. Sorry, should have been a bit clearer. I am referring to all my

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Nick, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ND If the original message is still in the same folder then I just ND alt-click on the subject to filter. It's a kind of simple thread ND view. Whilst I can see the use of that it's not exactly what I want. In another programme

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Richard, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:01:53 +0100 GMT (06/10/2004, 15:01 +0700 GMT), Richard Wakeford wrote: RW Is there a quick way of moving to the original message and back please? A keyboard shortcut or menu item Go to parent should be in the wish list somewhere, I hope. It was mentioned

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Richard, Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 6:46:11 PM, you wrote: ASK [the follow previous and follow next entries in the Navigation ASK menu of the message viewer would ideally follow the related messages Unfortunately that would not be precise enough anyway because it's not the next or

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASK what I meant to say was it would be desirable if those commands ASK would follow the *thread*, not only in the current folder but ASK global. That's more like it :-) -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0.1 RC5

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Thomas, On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF A keyboard shortcut or menu item Go to parent should be in the wish TF list somewhere, I hope. It was mentioned often enough enough. Ah, I was using the wrong search words. I'll try again because I knew I'd seen it before.

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Thursday, October 07, 2004, 10:09 AM, you wrote: TF A keyboard shortcut or menu item Go to parent should be in the TF wish list somewhere ... RW Ah, I was using the wrong search words. I'll try again because I RW knew I'd seen it before. Thanks. If you find it, Richard,

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MB If you find it, Richard, please post the URL of the note here, and MB I'll put a supporting note for the wish, also. I certainly shall. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0.1 RC5 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600),

Re[2]: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Mary, On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MB If you find it, Richard, please post the URL of the note here Couldn't find any reference to it so have added one myself. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3880 -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0.1 RC5 SpamPal |

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Richard! On Thursday, October 07, 2004, 11:05 AM, you wrote: MB If you find it, Richard, please post the URL of the note here RW Couldn't find any reference to it so have added one myself. RW https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3880 So I've just been there and added my note of

Moving to original message

2004-10-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
the archives. Is there a quick way of moving to the original message and back please? -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0.1 RC4 SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 2 | and the best browser: Opera 7.60 build 7141 PGP public key: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-06 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello Richard, Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 9:01:53 AM, you wrote: RW Is there a quick way of moving to the original message and back please? If the original message is still in the same folder then I just alt-click on the subject to filter. It's a kind of simple thread view. -- Nick

Re: Moving to original message

2004-10-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Richard, Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 10:01:53 AM, you wrote: Is there a quick way of moving to the original message and back please? I'd say it depends on where - in a mailing list folder you'll mostly have threaded messages, anyway, but in your personal inbox its difficult. [the follow

Moving from POP to IMAP on The Bat..

2004-09-26 Thread Tom Kiblin
Hello Folks - I've been happily running The Bat for a year now and I am trying to figure out a game plan to move from a POP3 setup to an IMAP setup, including moving my 65000 emails and lots of attachments up to my server under IMAP. Any suggestions on migrating everything I have to IMAP

Re: Moving from POP to IMAP on The Bat..

2004-09-26 Thread ken green
On 2004-09-26 8:31 AM, Tom Kiblin wrote: I've been happily running The Bat for a year now and I am trying to figure out a game plan to move from a POP3 setup to an IMAP setup, including moving my 65000 emails and lots of attachments up to my server under IMAP. 65000 messages? I'd definitely

Re: Moving from POP to IMAP on The Bat..

2004-09-26 Thread Allie Martin
using another client for the migration as well. TB! is not good at moving a lot of messages from a POP to an IMAP account. You'd have to export the TB! messages to unix format. Place the unix exports into the mail directory for ThunderBird. When you open ThunderBird, it will contain folders

Re: Filter: read message moving to folder does not work any more when the folder is moved

2004-09-18 Thread MAU
Hello Edgar, Will this change? I thought it was a nice thing that you could move a folder and the program could still find it. This is due to a bug discovered after 3.0 was released. It was already fixed in one of the post-release betas. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -

Filter: read message moving to folder does not work any more when the folder is moved

2004-09-17 Thread Edgar van Dijk
Hello All, I use a filter to move a read message to a folder. In version 2 I could move this folder with shift-ctrl up and down to other folders and the filter still worked (the was dynamic). This does not work in version 3 any more the reference to the folder is permanent. Will this change? I

Moving off

2004-09-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
As a courtesy to all of you who have helped me over the years, a short note of thanks to say that I'm taking a break from TB! for a variety of reasons. The recent beta/new version/licensing bruhaha sort of turned me off, but more important to me, I wrote two polite requests for information from

Re: Moving off

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Jan, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:13:53 -0400GMT (3-9-2004, 17:13 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JR So take care. Since your message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] was the first message ever that I received on TBUDL I can't say anything else than that you'll be missed. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat!

Moving Messages to Unsubscribed IMAP Folders?

2004-06-23 Thread Rocky Giannini
Hello All, I am a long-time Bat follower (probably 3 or 4 years), but have only recently taken the plunge and registered the program because of the advances made with IMAP support -- I use IMAP exclusively because I need to be able to read my mail from several different PCs/Unix systems, etc. In

Moving Virtual Folders

2004-06-03 Thread Darrin
Hi, How do I move the my virtual folders all in one area under the *ALL* view in the account tree? I would like to have them all at the bottom of my account tree, underneath my bottom email account. Thanks -- Darrin Trying out Tbat but still prefer Opera's M2

Re: Moving Virtual Folders

2004-06-03 Thread Darrin
Hello Darrin, Thursday, June 3, 2004, 5:44:45 AM, you wrote: D How do I move the my virtual folders all in one area under the *ALL* D view in the account tree? Just figured it out. This is only my second time using tbat in quite some time. Im trying to get used to it all over again. -- Best

Re: Moving Filters to another account

2004-04-27 Thread Maxim Ryazanov
On Monday, 26 Apr 2004 11:24 [-0700], vince wrote: .. M http://tirna.narod.ru/soft/tbfc.htm VERY slow site! M Yes, it is. I can send it to you by PM as an attachment if you wish. M It's less than 400 KB. v No thank you. I already got it. Took a while. Why so slow the site? narod.ru (aka

Re: Moving Filters to another account

2004-04-26 Thread MAU
Hello Michael, I have set up several filters in one account. I'd like to move some of those filters into another account. Rather than copying and re-entering them, is there a way to move them? If it's easier, I could copy all of the filters and then delete the ones that I don't need in the

Re[2]: Moving Filters to another account

2004-04-26 Thread vince
Hello MAU, Monday, April 26, 2004, 1:37:45 AM, you wrote: M Hello Michael, I have set up several filters in one account. I'd like to move some of those filters into another account. Rather than copying and re-entering them, is there a way to move them? If it's easier, I could copy all of

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >