Hello TBUDL members,
As I have understood it:
Received time is my time, Created time is sender's time and GT or GMT
is just the latter says - Mean time, or 0 time (it's the longitude,
which is what makes time time).
Therefore, the suggestion to include the sender's time zone in a
message sent
Hi there!
On 24 Nov 99, at 11:50, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: Original Message Date and time ":
I would prefer it to always be in GMT (as pine does it), but I have
seen from my colleagues that the lcoal time is more appreciated by the
average user.
And I'll explain you why...
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
And I'll explain you why...
snip
Now what would he think about this Alexander V. Kiselev, who
was supposed to teach students of the 4th course from 11-
00AM till 2-45 PM?:-)))
chuckle That's a nice example.
I do feel ridiculous sending messages at my local
Hi Alexander,
on Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 10:56:56 PM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
I would prefer it to always be in GMT (as pine does it), but I have
seen from my colleagues that the lcoal time is more appreciated by the
average user.
AVK And I'll explain you why...
AVK
Hi Ali,
on Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 7:41:17 AM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote:
AM Isn't the macro for the original message date and time be taken from
AM the Kludges of the message sent ad verbatim? Why is the time
AM converted to my time zone when I'm replying. Wouldn't the recipient
AM
5 matches
Mail list logo
