Thursday, October 6, 2022, 2:30:19 PM, you wrote:
Sunday, July 3, 2022, 3:32:45 PM, you wrote:
Hi Chris,
I finally got around to doing this and I am happy to report a successful
outcome.
All these older messages are now combined in subfolders under Archive XXX and
having this Account
Sunday, July 3, 2022, 3:32:45 PM, you wrote:
Hi Chris,
I finally got around to doing this and I am happy to report a successful
outcome.
All these older messages are now combined in subfolders under Archive XXX and
having this Account stored on a separate drive, does indeed reduce the size
T>> So, you guys never felt the need for this ? With 152 gb I would expect TB
to be quite slow to open and having proper backups to be a pain?
> I am getting old and forgetful. It suddenly occurred to me that I
> had once asked a similar question here, and as I have kept all
> messages from
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 14:07:36, Tom wrote:
> So, you guys never felt the need for this ? With 152 gb I would expect TB to
> be quite slow to open and having proper backups to be a pain?
Used to be that TB was a bit slow (=5 seconds) to open folders with more than
~9000 messages, but
Saturday, June 25, 2022, 6:33:05 PM, you wrote:
> On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:25:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Watching with interest 40 + GB of mail and attachments here, which stored in
>> the current database is ridiculous
> 152 GB here…
So, you guys never felt the need for this ?
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, 10:25:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Watching with interest 40 + GB of mail and attachments here, which stored in
> the current database is ridiculous
152 GB here…
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< https://eternallybored.org/ >
Any fool can make a rule, and every
Hello Tom,
On Saturday, June 25, 2022, you wrote:
T> Hello Everyone,
T> my TB has grown over the years and the backup files are now more than
T> gb in size.
T> I would like to tidy up a bit without messing up everything.
T> My idea is to create new Archive folders and then moving older
7 matches
Mail list logo
