Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hello ~John, Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:22:26 PM, you wrote: ~ Paul Smithson wrote: P Why you would include a £ symbol ~ Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ? You make a very valid point :))) Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hello Paul Smithson, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 18:00:16GMT + (which was 1:00 PM in the tropics where I live) Paul Smithson postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of Filters for Spam: PS Hello John, PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote: ~

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hello Miguel A. Urech, On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 19:45:04GMT +0100 (which was 1:45 PM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech posted: [strings] £ MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business MAU e-mail :) If you send me mail with $, £ or any

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hi Paul, Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:00:16 PM, you wrote: PS Hello John, PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote: ~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me: ~ [strings] ~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿ PS Why you would include a £ symbol. PS As a Brit I feel pretty

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hi Miguel, Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:45:04 PM, you wrote: MAU Hello ~John, Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me: [strings] £ MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business MAU e-mail :) Well, no, because if you have any sense you make messages

Re[2]: Filters for Spam

Hi St, Saturday, February 22, 2003, 1:59:18 AM, you wrote: You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business e-mail :) SMN Can't see why since this is what a whitelist would and should fix. Try replying to the right person. You just piggybacked my reply ;-) -- Best