Hi Jast,
on Wednesday, November 24, 1999, 6:03:17 AM GMT+0800, Jast wrote:
>> That it would. I like the idea of a template definition, just not
>> sure if I want to fully endorse another template macro which is
>> nothing more than a toggle that is better served, IMHO, by
>> checkboxes on the templates.
J> I prefer template macros. They are more versatile (in regard to
J> usability - you never know what functionality you could add to a
J> macro) and don't take up window space if you don't use it. Really, I
J> don't like long option lists. Of course, macros should be well
J> documented...
I think a macro makes sense if you have inoput, such as an email
address in the %TO= macro.
If a marco is in truth just a yes/no switch, as this %SkipHeader would
be, I'd agree with Steve and would prefer it to be a checkbox.
Same holds true, by the way, for the %Singlere macro: IMHO it should
be a checkbox.
--
Best regards,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
