Re[3]: Filters

2005-10-26 Thread Jack S. LaRosa
Hello Stuart, Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 8:14:08 AM, you wrote: SC Hello Thomas, SC Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote: TF Where are you? TF I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a TF General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab.

Re[3]: Filters, Spam and Edits - test

2003-08-28 Thread Dave Kennedy
Thursday, August 28, 2003, 10:36:11 AM, PJ wrote: P On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote P re: editing an inbox message: PJ If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn PJ how! You can also: 1. Drag the message to your Outbox folder. 2. Open it (double

Re[3]: Filters, Spam and Edits

2003-08-28 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
It seems that P.Johnson (as quoted by a Canadian in Houston) said ... Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB: Export the message Edit the subject with Notepad or another text editor. Import the message back into TB. Now you can delete the original message. There might be a

Re[3]: Filters don't work

2003-07-28 Thread Deborah W
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 7:45:08 PM, Granville Cousins wrote: GC How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on GC the email address or the subject line being identical on each GC mail-out. You could use something like Popfile or Spampal, something which looks at what's

Re[3]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-09 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello myob, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at14:54:54[GMT +0100](which was 14:54 where I live) you wrote: MO Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you MO send? Ask them! m IIRC, Richard, that's what CIX/Ameol does. Yes it does but I was still getting mail in my TB inbox

Re[3]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-09 Thread Scott McNay
Hi, Richard! Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 1:28:02 AM, you wrote: RW Hello Thomas, RW Ah, all my questions being gradually answered apart from why messages RW originally went to the inbox without a CC and now don't but I will RW amend my rules so that outgoing messages go straight to the

Re[3]: Filters are sooooo complicated

2002-10-08 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- I got lost somewhere in the circular logic here, but... The messages you send out end up in your Sent Mail folder. Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you? If so, then, yes, you need to CC or BCC yourself. If you're just wanting confirmation that the message you sent got to

Re[3]: Filters again

2002-07-22 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, July 22, 2002, Lynn Turriff wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TM I would suggest a little different approach. Put all your spam TM addresses in a 'spamers' AB group, then have your filter process TM against that AB group. That way you don't need to modify your

Re[3]: Filters -- alphabetizing folders

2002-02-04 Thread ETM
Peter, Thank you for this. It took out one password, but refuses to budge on the second account. What am I missing? Elaine Hello ETM, On Friday, February 1, 2002 at 11:41:12 PM you wrote (at least in part): E Now, how do I get rid of the password dialogue box? Do you have set an

Re[3]: Filters -- alphabetizing folders

2002-02-01 Thread ETM
In further reference to filtering, my cable provider has just changed mail addresses on me. Is there a way to combine the accounts (old and new addresses) or at least copy the filters set up in the old address to the new account address? Elaine --

Re[3]: Filters

2001-12-09 Thread Rudy Willis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello Alastair, 9 Dec 2001, 1:26:44 PM, you wrote: You should also activate Continue processing with other filters, otherwise your filtering would stop after this filter (which is at the top of the list :-( ). All your other filters would be

Re[3]: Filters for outgoing messages?

1999-12-23 Thread Roel
\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Oliver, R if you want to use windows-variables, you should use them like this: R %windowsdir% OS Nice to know that works ;) Anyway,