-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Wednesday, September 20, 2000 21:09:44, our bat friend Tony Boom typed:
KE Yes, that's the case for me too, but when i reply to a msg on
KE this list, TB! should be looking to see if the address in the
KE "to" field matches one in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Thursday, September 21, 2000 07:49:28, our bat friend Thomas Fernandez typed:
TF Nice touch. You get an award for being the first one to change the
TF reply prefix into a reply suffix. ;-)
I've always wanted to come up with cool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
on Wednesday, September 20, 2000 19:05:48, our bat friend Krister Ekstrom typed:
KE Let's see if i got things right. I'll have to define a
KE template myself for the account in order for the address book
KE templates to work,
This message: 21/09/2000 18:14 GMT.
Hello Krister,
A reminder of what Krister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
21 September 2000 at 16:30:38 GMT +0200
KE Reason: there was another entry which had the same address as the one
KE i had defined a template for, and the bat got puzzled.
Well
Hello tbuDL,
Please forgive this newbie for all the stupid questions to which
there already probably are answers, but now i got upset and i'll
have to ask this. When i'm in a folder for which there's no reply
template defined, but which has an entry in the address book with a
with the same thing, and this is the way to go.
Hope this works
Cheers,
Marcel
- Origineel Bericht -
Van: Krister Ekstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Woensdag 20 September 2000 12:23
Onderwerp: Reply templates yet again
Hello tbuDL,
Please forgive this newbie for all the stupid questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Krister,
On 20 September 2000 at 12:23:52 GMT +0200 (which was 11:23 where I
live) Krister Ekstrom wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Reply templates yet again":
KE Please forgive this newbie for all the stupid question
t 12:23:52 GMT +0200 (which was 11:23 where I
live) Krister Ekstrom wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Reply templates yet again":
KE Please forgive this newbie for all the stupid questions to which
KE there already probably are answers, but now i got upset and i'l
This message: 20/09/2000 13:48 GMT.
Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
20 September 2000 at 11:59:20 GMT +0100
Marcel suggested that you need to have your folder level templates
defined for the AB templates to work.
I've been playing with templates for
This message: 20/09/2000 13:27 GMT.
Hello Krister,
A reminder of what Krister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
20 September 2000 at 12:23:52 GMT +0200
KE Does the folder template have presedence over the address
KE template or what has this newbie missed? Thanks for any answers.
Hello Tony,
Wednesday, September 20, 2000, 3:01:36 PM, you wrote:
TB Marcel suggested that you need to have your folder level templates
TB defined for the AB templates to work. But if it's so, why should
TB address book templates be needed at all? If i define a folder TB
template for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Krister,
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
[...]
KE Yes, that's the case for me too, but when i reply to a msg on this
KE list, TB! should be looking to see if the address in the "to" field
KE matches one in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday, September 20, 2000, Tony Boom wrote:
TB Marcel suggested that you need to have your folder level templates
TB defined for the AB templates to work.
Euh, yep. But not necessarily the Folder template. The Account
template would
This message: 20/09/2000 20:05 GMT.
Hello Krister,
A reminder of what Krister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
20 September 2000 at 19:25:11 GMT +0200
KE Yes, that's the case for me too, but when i reply to a msg on this
KE list, TB! should be looking to see if the address in the "to"
Hi Krister,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 19:25:11 +0200GMT (21/09/2000, 01:25 +0800GMT),
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
KE And what confuddles me even more is that the first part of this
KE message has been strangely formatted... Sorry for this, hope my
KE points got across.
Nice touch. You get an award for
Hi Krister,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 19:05:48 +0200GMT (21/09/2000, 01:05 +0800GMT),
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
KE Hmmm, i think i need a further explanation... Too little coffee
KE today... Let's see if i got things right. I'll have to define a
KE template myself for the account in
16 matches
Mail list logo
