Hello Lynn,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 5:57:59 PM, you wrote:
IL Go to BayesIt home page and download the database from
IL them. Load it up, and you will see the difference.
It's worth a try ... thanks!
Ummm .. I wrote that before I'd discovered that I can't
find the home page. I went
Thursday, September 30, 2004, 7:47:24 AM, you wrote:
IL Back Up yours : spamdict.bye, spamdict.idx
IL spamdict.lst from bayesit
IL folder, extract downloaded file and replace this files
IL files.
IL Don't forget to shut down TheBat before doing it :)
OK - I'll go look again.
I suspect it
On 29-9-2004, 7:06, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
Never used K9. I have used SpamPal for quite some time now. After a while,
when
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:06:27 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 7:06 +0100, where I
live), Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
I am working with Poptray 3.03
Hi Michael,
On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 22:06 your local time, which was
Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 06:06 my local time, Michael Wilson
[MLW] wrote;
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so
Hello Michael,
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
Try POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), It has been running for
me with 99.82% accuracy for over one year.
--
Best
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:06:27 AM, you wrote:
MLW Hi,
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
Been using K9 for a year now. Never used SpamPal
Hello Sander,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
back.
Have a google on it...
--
Nick
On 29-9-2004, 10:25, Nick Dutton wrote:
ND Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 8:30:55 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
ND
ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
ND
Hello Sander,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:43:53 AM, you wrote:
SvdB But, to be honest, I would prefer a freeware Windows version of SpamAssassin.
SvdB But it does not exist... :-(
ND SA is just perl, I had it running nicely OK on a PC a couple of years
ND back.
SvdB I know, I had it
Hello,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 7:06:27 AM, you wrote:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
MLW others think?
K9 is more better than SpamPal for me (near 100% accurancy) but you
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
M Try POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), It has been running for
M me with 99.82% accuracy for over one year.
For the record POPFile
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 10:43:53 AM, Sander van den Berg wrote:
Onetime, there was a free program called SAproxy, but a while ago it has
gone commercial
I used to use it but it was very very slow. Then I test K9 which was
by far better and then BayesIt. Now, I use BayesFilter
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 1:06:27 AM, you wrote:
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
Most probable that it been taught badly.
It doesn't meter which one
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
IL Most probable that it been taught badly.
IL It doesn't meter which one program do you use, K9, POPFile, ... all of
IL them have exactly
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 5:42:48 AM, you wrote:
IL 10-20 messages and 90% accuracy of filtering.
IL A few hints, if you have subscribed to any mailing
IL lists, don't mark
IL messages as NOT Junk, put them in white list.
IL White list and black list what you can and let the
IL filter to
Hallo Lynn,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:55:52 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 17:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L How would you deal with an account which has very little
L legit traffic, but seems to be a spam magnet?
I'd drop it as soon as possible.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 3.0.0.19
Windows XP
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 9:10:36 AM, you wrote:
RO I'd drop it as soon as possible.
Drop what, the account?
I suppose it's worth considering ...
--
Lynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
http://www.turriff.net
TBv.3.0.0.14
NT5 SP4
Hallo Lynn,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:52:34 -0700GMT (29-9-2004, 18:52 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO I'd drop it as soon as possible.
L Drop what, the account?
Yep, anything that gets far more spam than legit mail isn't worth
maintaining.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
The Bat! 3.0.0.19
Windows XP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:06:27 -0700 (1:06 AM here), Michael L. Wilson
[MLW] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MLW I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
MLW think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote:
RO Yep, anything that gets far more spam than legit
RO mail isn't worth
RO maintaining.
No doubt you are right, but I'm having some trouble
training some my correspondents to use the other address
:-(
I'll NAG them! lol!
tnx,
--
Lynn
Hello Lynn everyone else
29-Sep-2004 21:50, you wrote:
No doubt you are right, but I'm having some trouble
training some my correspondents to use the other address
:-(
They'll learn when they get the no mailbox here by that name responder...
;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Lynn,
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 11:55:52 AM, you wrote:
How would you deal with an account which has very little
legit traffic, but seems to be a spam magnet?
I have shifted some messages from other accounts and
marked them 'not junk', when I remember, but it's not very
Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 2:18:26 PM, you wrote:
IL Go to BayesIt home page and download the database from
IL them. Load it up, and you will see the difference.
It's worth a try ... thanks!
Ummm .. I wrote that before I'd discovered that I can't
find the home page. I went back through
of BayesIt than the present ones, so I gave up on it.
Steve . . .
Michael, Tuesday, September 28, 2004, 10:06:27 PM, you wrote:==
Hi,
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think
Hallo Steve,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:40:06 -0700GMT (30-9-2004, 0:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMK Michael,
SMK I really like K9 ( POPFile), but to conserve resources on this old system I'm
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person
Hallo Steve,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:40:06 -0700GMT (30-9-2004, 0:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
SMK Michael,
snip
SMK
SMK Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
SMK http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hi,
I have to get off BayesIT! It learns way to slow. What do people
think of SpamPal or K9? I have tried both and like both...so, what do
others think?
--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Critic
Teacher
:einsteinyoyo
28 matches
Mail list logo
