Unicode (was: Re: Digest (09/29/2000 04:51) Special Issue (#2000-368))

2000-09-30 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Ming-Li, On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 10:06:14 -0700 GMT (01/10/2000, 01:06 +0800 GMT), Ming-Li wrote: ML Thanks for the quote. Then how about viewing? It's not of particular ML importance to me, since I haven't received anything in such ML encodings. The possibility of reading/writing in Unicode

Re: Unicode (was: Re: Digest (09/29/2000 04:51) Special Issue (#2000-368))

2000-09-30 Thread Ming-Li
On Saturday, September 30, 2000, 11:13:33 AM, Thomas wrote: I think that Unicode is the future, Agreed. and tracer said that in W2K, it's there as a standard. At least back to NT4, Unicode has been the internal system code, same with Office 97 (at least) and up. -- Best regards, Ming-Li