Hi Karin,
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:56:17 +0200GMT (27/09/2000, 02:56 +0800GMT),
Karin Spaink wrote:
KS I guess it depends on whether you pop or not. When popping
KS mail the Time Received is stamped when you download - and
KS that is why in Folder View I prefer ro order them according
KS to Time
On Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 10:33:27 PM, Syafril wrote:
Oops, I misunderstood your question.
No, you didn't.
I mean the word above for "download message base on size, the
litte size come first and so on".
Yup, that's what I wanted to know.
In regard to Time Stamp, I
don't think it
Monday, September 25, 2000, 11:41:39 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
On 25-09-2000 at 23:39, Paul Freeman kindly wrote:
I have it like this, except I sort on Received time for most folders
due to egroups being a bit strange on the creation time front.
But received time depends on when you
On Monday, September 25, 2000, 9:45:51 PM, Syafril wrote:
On certain condition sort on Created Times much better than
Received, just like me. My last setting on my Server here in
office, message will download base on message Size, means the
smaller size will download first from our
Hello Karin
On 25 September 2000, at 23:45, you wrote
Good question Paul, I've puzzled over that one too - I bet there's a
key stroke for it.
KS Ctrl-*
Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
--
have a good day
Charlie (ceejay)
--
On 26-09-2000 at 15:37, Ming-Li kindly wrote:
On Monday, September 25, 2000, 9:45:51 PM, Syafril wrote:
On certain condition sort on Created Times much better than
Received, just like me. My last setting on my Server here in
office, message will download base on message Size, means
Hello Charlie and TBUDL,
Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 14:10:03, Charlie wrote:
snip
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
Try Ctrl + to open an entire thread. (US keyboard)
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
Hello Havivah
On 26 September 2000, at 22:19, you wrote
HDS Hello Charlie and TBUDL,
HDS Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 14:10:03, Charlie wrote:
HDS snip
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
HDS Try Ctrl + to open an entire thread. (US keyboard)
Aha
Ctrl Shift + opens the thread
On 26-09-2000 at 23:19, Havivah D. Schwartz kindly wrote:
Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 14:10:03, Charlie wrote:
[keystroke to open an entire thread]
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
Try Ctrl + to open an entire thread. (US keyboard)
And wjatever keyboard lay-out you use, don't
Hello Karin
On 26 September 2000, at 23:41, you wrote
KS On 26-09-2000 at 23:19, Havivah D. Schwartz kindly wrote:
Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 14:10:03, Charlie wrote:
KS [keystroke to open an entire thread]
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
Try Ctrl + to open an entire
On 27-09-2000 at 00:09, Charlie Turner (ceejay) kindly wrote:
[opening all threads with a keystroke]
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin =:-/
HDS Try Ctrl + to open an entire thread. (US keyboard)
Aha
Ctrl Shift + opens the thread
Ctrl Shift - closes it
Now try Ctrl-* -- that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charlie,
On 26 September 2000 at 23:09:46 GMT +0100 (which was 23:09 where I
live) Charlie Turner (ceejay) wrote and made these points on the subject
of "unread messages with complete thread":
KS Ctrl-*
CTc Doesn't work for me Karin
Hello Marck
On 27 September 2000, at 00:08, you wrote
CTc Aha
CTc Ctrl Shift + opens the thread
CTc Ctrl Shift - closes it
CTc Got there in the end :
MDP ... And Ctrl-KeyPad* (US/UK keyboard) opens *all* threads in a folder
MDP (that's what Karin was trying to say).
Gotcha! is there no
On 27-09-2000 at 01:31, Charlie Turner (ceejay) kindly wrote:
MDP ... And Ctrl-KeyPad* (US/UK keyboard) opens *all* threads in a folder
MDP (that's what Karin was trying to say).
Gotcha! is there no end to the number of keystrokes in TB? :)
Try calculating the possible combinations of all
Hello Paul,
On Tuesday, September 26, 2000 at 11:41:42 GMT +0100 (which was 3:41 AM
where I live) witnesses say Paul Freeman typed:
The one command that's lacking is the 'Close all threads'.
Not as necessary for me. Moving to a different folder seems to close
the threads (sometimes;
Hello Karin Spaink,
Responding to your article on Tue, 26 Sep 2000 at 20:56:17 GMT +0200
(which was 27/09/2000 1:56 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
On certain condition sort on Created Times much better than
Received, just like me. My last setting on my Server here in office,
message
Hello Syafril Hermansyah,
Responding to your article on Wed, 27 Sep 2000 at 09:57:26 GMT +0700
(which was 27/09/2000 9:57 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
On certain condition sort on Created Times much better than Received,
just like me. My last setting on my Server here in office, message
On 25-09-2000 at 17:09, Paul Freeman kindly wrote:
I'm new to The Bat! and learning new stuff from this list. Thank you
all. I've been using Forte Agent for many years and there are a few
features that I miss. One of them is viewing unread messages and
being able to see the complete thread.
Monday, September 25, 2000, 5:11:18 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
I use Full-width preview pane. This way, in the main window you have
your folders to the left and a preview of the selected folder to the
right.
* Click on View, select View Treads by Reference;
* Click on View, select Sort by
Hello Paul
On 25 September 2000, at 22:39, Paul wrote
PF I do prefer to follow the threads but can see I'm going to have to
PF not. It wouldn't be so bad if I could space-bar my way through the
PF unread messages, but I end up having to use a weird combination of
PF tabs, CTRL-]'s, CTRL-+'s and
On 25-09-2000 at 23:39, Paul Freeman kindly wrote:
Monday, September 25, 2000, 5:11:18 PM, Karin Spaink wrote:
I use Full-width preview pane. This way, in the main window you have
your folders to the left and a preview of the selected folder to the
right.
* Click on View, select View Treads
On 26-09-2000 at 00:09, Charlie Turner (ceejay) kindly wrote:
PF Is there no expand all threads option either?
Good question Paul, I've puzzled over that one too - I bet there's a
key stroke for it.
Ctrl-*
For me a right click menu option to expand/collapse
individual threads would be a
Hello Karin,
On Monday, September 25, 2000 at 00:41:39 GMT +0200 (which was 3:41 PM
where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed:
I have it like this, except I sort on Received time for most folders
due to egroups being a bit strange on the creation time front.
But received time
Hello Januk Aggarwal,
Responding to your article on Mon, 25 Sep 2000 at 16:58:42 GMT -0700
(which was 26/09/2000 6:58 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
I have it like this, except I sort on Received time for most folders
due to egroups being a bit strange on the creation time front.
But
24 matches
Mail list logo
