Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator
Henk M. de Bruijn wrote : Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde op donderdag : If you do a complete re-install don't forget about the registry. What do you mean? Can you be more specific? The Bat! makes entries in the registry: HKEY_CURRENT_USER SOFTWARE RIT So I should delete that? the folder

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Mary, Friday, September 8, 2006, 1:37:50 AM, you wrote: MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the MB issue went from Resolved to Closed. Not by me... I thought it had something to do with Objectdock Plus Copernic Desktop Search. I have spent many an hour to

Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Hi, I need to edit pop up addresses in Bat! which come up when I compose a message and start to type the address into the To: field. Remember (but now forgotten) something about this on the list when I previously subscribed. Thanks for advice if available! (And apologies for the footer text -

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:12:21 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 9:12 , where I live), you wrote: JP I need to edit pop up addresses in Bat! which come up when I compose a JP message and start to type the address into the To: field. You can pick the addresses you'd like to pop-up with: Options -

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Roelof, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 10:39:10 [GMT +0200] (18:39:10 08/09/2006 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: You can pick the addresses you'd like to pop-up with: Options - Preferences - Message Headers - To: (you've got to select the header whose behaviour you want to alter) - Edit -

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mark! On Friday, September 08, 2006, 2:05 AM, you wrote: MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the MB issue went from Resolved to Closed. Not by me... No, by Charlene, before your post to TBBETA appeared. I thought it had something to do with Objectdock

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Friday, September 8, 2006, Mary Bull wrote: Hello Marek! I have just now experienced a series of cascading Alert boxes, while using the Insert Smile dialogue window. Boxes said, approximately, Cannot allow canvas redrawing. They were very rapid, filling the screen, and I had to

Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:48:18 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 5:48 , where I live), you wrote: TL I am a bit frantic as I just noticed that many of my existing emails TL seem to have gone. Well, as long as you can see them in your preview pane, they're still there. TL I upgraded yesterday to the

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:39:16 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 10:39 , where I live), you wrote: JP Thanks, but how can I delete old' (changed) addresses that pop up? JP Is there a file somewhere of these? Depends on the addresses you want to delete. When they're popping up from the history, you

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek! On Friday, September 08, 2006, 3:47 AM, you wrote: shall I write a new issue report? write a new one, because it is different than previous report. Will do. Thanks a lot for the reply, Marek. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3.85.02 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mark! On Friday, September 08, 2006, 2:05 AM, you wrote: MB This was confirmed fixed in beta 3.81.17, by the reporter, and the MB issue went from Resolved to Closed. Not by me... I thought it had something to do with Objectdock Plus Copernic Desktop Search. I have spent many an

Re: Insert Smile caused Canvas Redrawing alert box, cascading

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marek! On Friday, September 08, 2006, 3:47 AM, you wrote: ... shall I write a new issue report? write a new one, because it is different than previous report. Done. Thanks a mil, again, for the reply. And see: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6020 -- Best regards, Mary The Bat!

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:56:20 +0200GMT (8-9-2006, 8:56 +0200, where I live), A.Translator wrote: Henk M. de Bruijn wrote : Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde op donderdag : If you do a complete re-install don't forget about the registry. What do you mean? Can you be more specific? The Bat! makes

Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Friday, September 8, 2006, 6:49:29 PM, you wrote: TL I upgraded yesterday to the latest version and everything seemed fine. TL I first noticed that when using the search function and then trying to TL double click on one of the results to open the email, it does not TL work. TL Now I get the

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator
Het is zò dat Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde : So I should delete that? the folder Rit? I do that when I do/make a new/clean install. This way you don't use old settings.. Ok, when I reinstall, I'll try and remember ;-) -- Regards, Adriana. [ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:28:24 +0200GMT (8-9-2006, 12:28 +0200, where I live), A.Translator wrote: Het is zò dat Henk M. de Bruijn formuleerde : So I should delete that? the folder Rit? I do that when I do/make a new/clean install. This way you don't use old settings.. Ok, when I reinstall,

Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:23:04 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 12:23 , where I live), you wrote: TL Yes, unfortunately this is the case but as you said, the messages must TL still be there as I can see them in the preview pane and when trying TL to forward. I noticed that you've moved back to

.MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
I seem to be collecting more and more .MSG files in my default attachments folder. I've searched TB's help system and none of the hits for MSG seem to have anything to do with these files. They seem to contain email message bodies, and therefore that are, by definition, *NOT ATTACHMENTS*

Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hallo Roelof, Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:01:47 PM, you wrote: I noticed that you've moved back to 3.65.03, Are you still encountering the same problem? Was that the version you were using before? You are very observant, certainly more observant than I am. My signature was wrong, I had only

Re[2]: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hi Dean Friday, September 8, 2006, 11:15:37 PM, you wrote: I ran into the same problem. I reloaded the MSI file, went back a version and still had grey messages. I eventually went back to the latest 385.01 version and after about 30 minutes all of sudden the emails just started to show up

Re: No message loaded

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 23:03:31 +1000GMT (8-9-2006, 15:03 , where I live), you wrote: TL You are very observant, certainly more observant than I am. My TL signature was wrong, I had only amended the sig in new messages but TL not updated the reply function. I am still using 3.85.02. You

Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steven, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400 GMT (08/09/2006, 19:07 +0700 GMT), Steven P Vallière wrote: SPV I seem to be collecting more and more .MSG files SPV in my default attachments folder. I've searched TB's help SPV system and none of the hits for MSG seem to have anything

Handling of Attachments

2006-09-08 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I am wondering about the best way to deal with attachments? I am getting quite a few reports with attachments sent on a weekly basis and I tend to file many of the attached files on my HD anyway. Usually it's good to know that if I cannot find something later on my HD but

Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Steven, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400GMT (8-9-2006, 14:07 , where I live), you wrote: SPV(The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of SPVthe message bodies, but attachments as well, so one SPVwould assume the neither the body NOR the attachment SPVis lost if

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator
Henk M. de Bruijn stelde de volgende uitleg voor : Don't forget to backup I'didn't. I uninstalled TB! the proper way (add/remove) I unchecked the option to keep settings and data I deleted the folder Rit in the registry (current_user) I re-installed the Bat! (admittedly opting for 'restore

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread Luc
Good afternoon A.Translator, It was foretold that on 8/09/2006 @ 15:48:19 GMT+0200 (which was 15:48:19 where I live) A.Translator would write: snipped a bit AT Jim Kyle suggested earlier in this thread This information is usually stored, AT invisibly to the user, as part of the EXE file

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator
Luc gebruikte zijn klavier om te schrijven : did you download a fresh exe? Yes, I did. But you have a point ;-) -- Regards, Adriana. [ put out the rubbish if you need to reach me by e-mail ] www.spinsister.nl Current version is 3.85.02 |

Re: Smiley

2006-09-08 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tom everyone else, on 08-Sep-2006 at 00:41 you (Tom) wrote: I must be particularly slow today but I cannot figure out how to use the insert smile function in the new version that I just downloaded. The smileys are not embedded in the message, if thats what you mean. Its TB's own

Re: attachements can only be dragged

2006-09-08 Thread A . Translator
A.Translator had uiteengezet : The attachment problem is still there too: I cannot attach anything either trough the button, nor through keyboard short cuts, for the browse window does not show my files (it does show folders). After de-installing and re-installing TB! I did not see the plugin

Re[2]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
Roelof, Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:33:13 AM, you wrote: RO Hallo Steven, RO On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 08:07:03 -0400GMT (8-9-2006, 14:07 , where I live), RO you wrote: SPV(The messages.tbb files seem to have not only all of SPVthe message bodies, but attachments as well, so one SPVwould

Re[2]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
Thomas, Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:27:15 AM, you wrote: TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird. The files look like plain printable ASCII of the

Re[3]: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Steven P Vallière
SPV Thomas, SPV Friday, September 8, 2006, 9:27:15 AM, you wrote: TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird. SPV The files look like plain printable ASCII of

Re: Handling of Attachments

2006-09-08 Thread Richard H. Stoddard
Tom, Friday, September 8, 2006, 6:29:44 PM, you wrote: T Any tips from a working environment on how to best organise files with T attachments using TB? I store attachments in external directories as a rule. Sometimes I'll copy or move an attachment to a different directory depending on its

Re: OT: account properties and connection center

2006-09-08 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi M, on Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:11:26 +0700GMT (06.09.2006, 05:11 +0200GMT here), you wrote: SD 1. It's much easier if you can add a dropdown menu or something else MSD in account properties for changing different account quickly/directly without MSD having to close the account properties

Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 8 September 2006 at 4:36:50 AM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote: Anybody's guess. This is v. 3.85. Two years ago in September, we got 3.xx. If you're being watchful of the price, I'd wait another three months, anyway. However, when 3.xx came along, and some people

Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread Mary Bull
Hello MFPA! On Friday, September 08, 2006, 5:15 PM, you wrote: Anybody's guess. This is v. 3.85. Two years ago in September, we got 3.xx. If you're being watchful of the price, I'd wait another three months, anyway. However, when 3.xx came along, and some people got caught in the situation

Re: Upgrade?

2006-09-08 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 8 September 2006 at 11:49:34 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mary Bull wrote: Maybe my memory is confused and only wishful thinking. It was said on this list at the time that some people who had only just purchased v1 a few days before the release of v2 were sent a new key free

Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Steven, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:02:41 -0400 GMT (08/09/2006, 23:02 +0700 GMT), Steven P Vallière wrote: TF This would usually only happen if these .msg files are TF attachments to messages you received. If you are sure you TF didn't receive MIME-attached messages this would be weird. SPV

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Roelof, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 10:56:31 [GMT +0200] (18:56:31 08/09/2006 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: But you can also configure TB to only show addresses from your A and you should keep your AB current, that's why I pointed you to that option. (rest snipped) Thanks for the help. --

Re: Editing pop up addresses

2006-09-08 Thread John Phillips
Ian, On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, at 19:08:25 [GMT +1000] (19:08:25 08/09/2006 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: If this is an address in the history rather than the address book, pick the arrow to bring up the list, then press the down arrow on the keyboard to bring you to the list. Scroll down to

Re: .MSG files

2006-09-08 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 at 12:02:41 -0400, Steven wrote: Apparently, these must be some sort of unnamed attachment or something (since TB names them all using an 8 digit sequential number.MSG) that is coming in with some (or most?) of the SPAM I am receiving. You didn't at some stage export a