On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mo Are you up to it? I am going to be working on this object ref
Mo queue thing for some time, so if you could take a whack at the
Mo Notifier it would really help. There is not going to
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mo I ran the tests again, and it looks like everything is working
Mo just great. I can also run some multi-threaded tests that did
Mo not work in the past.
Mo Are there any remaining issues we need to look at before
Mo merging
"Mo" == Mo DeJong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mo Are you up to it? I am going to be working on this object ref
Mo queue thing for some time, so if you could take a whack at the
Mo Notifier it would really help. There is not going to be much
Mo overlap in these changes, so they
]
-Original Message-
From: Dan Wickstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Tcl Java] Re: possible memory.
Jiang Wu wrote:
Let's not forget there is a problem with the putting object
on a queue
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Jiang Wu wrote:
That may be true for your specific case. Though, it is not true in general.
One could also potentially delete the interpreter without removing the
thread. For example, one may be using a pool of Java threads to do some
work. One thread is retrieved,
Mo DeJong wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Dan Wickstrom wrote:
What does your src/tclblend/tcl/lang/CObject.java finalize()
method look like? I thought the last round of patches left
that ptr dangling on purpose. I have not has time to
Yes the finalize method just calls the super
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jiang Wu wrote:
Let's not forget there is a problem with the putting object on a queue for
deletion by the interpreter. As the GC may run at a random time, it is
possible when a Cobject is being finalized, the associated interpreter is
already deleted.
1. Create a
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Dan Wickstrom wrote:
What does your src/tclblend/tcl/lang/CObject.java finalize()
method look like? I thought the last round of patches left
that ptr dangling on purpose. I have not has time to
Yes the finalize method just calls the super class finalize
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Daniel Wickstrom wrote:
The TclList.getLength method converts indexListObj to a TclList object
which uses an underlying Tcl_Obj to hold the internal rep. At the end
of this case statement, it returns leaving indexListObj with no
references. The jvm garbage collects
The last posting got mangled a little, so I'm attaching the trace file. It's
probably a lot clearer than looking at my last posting.
-Dan
0 ckalloc 8c5d99024./../generic/tclLiteral.c 261
1 ckalloc 8c5d9d817./../generic/tclLiteral.c 267
10 matches
Mail list logo
