[Sorry for the late response, the message was in the spam box]
On 08/06/2015 11:32, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:12:03 +0100 Francois-Xavier Le
Baildevel.fx.leb...@orange.fr wrote
On 26/05/2015 15:33, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On 05/26/2015 11:46 AM,
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:12:03 +0100 Francois-Xavier Le
Baildevel.fx.leb...@orange.fr wrote
On 26/05/2015 15:33, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On 05/26/2015 11:46 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
I propose this:
We could give an End of Life date for each release branches.
From: Michal Sekletar msekl...@redhat.com
Instead I propose we should consider scheme used by Linux kernel, i.e.
having {tcpdump,libpcap}-$version-stable and
{tcpdump,libpcap}-$version-longterm branches.
AFAIK, This is not the scheme used by the linux kernel.
they don't have '-stable' or
On 05/26/2015 11:46 AM, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
AFAIK, This is not the scheme used by the linux kernel.
they don't have '-stable' or '-longterm' in their names as these are
moving 'attributes' given on the main page of kernel.org.
You are right, those really are attributes.
I
On 05/21/2015 08:16 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
rather do that than have old stable. I'd rather call them something like:
wheezy-4.7
or centos7-4.7
Clearly having CentOS branch upstream would make my life
Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
rather do that than have old stable. I'd rather call them something
like:
wheezy-4.7
or centos7-4.7
So, if both Chocolate Coated Spinach Linux Orangina
There was a discussion about what branches to possibly backport fixes to.
Guy has related:
Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Wireshark has:
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle
* the current development branch (master, trunk, whatever);
* the current stable
On May 21, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Michael Richardson m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd
rather do that than have old stable. I'd rather call them something like:
wheezy-4.7
or centos7-4.7
So, if both Chocolate Coated
