In some email I received from Guy Harris, sie wrote:
On Sep 8, 2004, at 2:26 AM, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Here's a patch against 5.3 to add a per-instance switch which allows
the user to specify if captured packets should be timestamped (and,
if so, whether microtime() or the faster but
This is probably a pointless optimization, as you probably relatively
rarely have multiple BPF devices bound to the same interface receiving
the bulk of the packets (as opposed to some daemon with a filter that
passes only the packets it's interested in), but would there be any
advantage to
Matthew Luckie wrote:
The motivation for this patch was to obtain something resembling the
timestamp closest to when a packet I generated and transmitted hit the
wire, to infer a more accurate RTT with an associated response packet.
That's certainly a worthy goal, but the patch might not help
