Re: [tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp

2005-01-06 Thread Dumas Hwang
;/* timestamp nanoseconds */ }; Regards, Dumas Hwang Should I add a new struct and request a new magic number? I would think many people need nanosecond resolution (if not picosecond). That's probably a reasonable short-term answer, if you need this soon. I wouldn't do much of anything

Re: [tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp

2005-01-06 Thread Dumas Hwang
Yes, I can use that structure too. Sorry, I am quite new to this. Is the next step to get the magic number, change Ethereal so that it will recognize the new magic number and submit the patch? Regards, Dumas Hwang So the Navtel header should perhaps be struct pcaprec_navtel_hdr

Re: [tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp

2005-01-06 Thread Dumas Hwang
Can I get a magic number associated with this format? Regards, Dumas Hwang -Original Message- From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 6, 2005 4:20 PM To: tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org Subject: Re: [tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp Dumas Hwang wrote: Yes, I

[tcpdump-workers] request for new type

2004-12-09 Thread Dumas Hwang
Hi! I would like to request two new link layer types for Generic Framing Procedure (DLT_GFP_T and DLT_GFP_F). Thank you. Regards, Dumas Hwang - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.

[tcpdump-workers] nanosecond timestamp

2004-12-09 Thread Dumas Hwang
nanosecond resolution (if not picosecond). Has this been done before? Regards, Dumas Hwang - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.