Re: 802.1X - WPA enterprise mode not yet supported ?

2010-07-08 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:00:34PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: it just took me 2 hours to figure out that OpenBSD does not yet support the WPA enterprise mode (aka 802.1X). Is this actually true? If yes, please include the patch below to make this clear in the man page. yes, see

shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Marc Espie
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs). in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to @wantlib in each port. This currently isn't done automatically... check-lib-depends is sloooww (needs to check every file before packaging) and not even flawless. I'm

acpi woes on recent ASUS laptops

2010-07-08 Thread Torbjørn H . Orskaug
Hi t...@! acpiac(4) and acpibat(4) on my ASUS UL30A laptop are not working correctly. On load, both devices return 'not present'. However, when the embedded controller fires a GPE event on ac/battery insertion/removal, they suddenly appear and apm(8) reports their status correctly. Under

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:03:47PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010/07/08 11:50, Marc Espie wrote: each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs). in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to @wantlib in each port. This currently isn't done

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs). in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to @wantlib in each port. For the base and xenocara libs, wouldn't it make sense to have some modules

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Thursday 08 July 2010 02:03:41 pm Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs). in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to @wantlib in each port. For the base and

Planes bajo CUIT Con Equipos y Abonos Bonificados - tech

2010-07-08 Thread Claro Argentina
Es Simple, Es Claro. Descubra la mejor y mas econsmica manera de comunicarse. Comunicacisn entre los equipos de su flota gratuita e ilimitada en todo el pams. Equipos totalmente bonificados.

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Sam Smith
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:03:41PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs). in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

2010-07-08 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote: Briefly, the only info that changes is - p* numbers (e.g., PKGNAME = somethingpN) - WANTLIB for the affected package. As much as I don't like adding, as naddy would put it, more magic, I think the p* numbers could live in a separate file, along with most