And this smaller diff excludes the node-based table.
Since revision 1.8 (extra sanity checking for afree()) is the
youngest commit of alloc.c i guess that checking should not be
removed. But that unidirectional list walk is a real killer:
with the test from one of my former mails and 1
Wanted or not, here is the promised big diff which does the
following:
1. Encapsulate struct table iteration usage
(*All* direct accesses encapsulated with struct tstate.)
2. ktinit() shouldn't expect pow2 size requests..
(It's really better that way.)
3. Turn struct table over to
My impression on going over the netbsd commits where this came
from is that this was intended to be used with pci_set_powerstate and
friends. So I think the definitions should go, the bge changes go in,
but the ifdef'd out chunks with cardbus_setpowerstate should be deleted
entirely rather than
uudecode(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -a -p -u -r1.17 uudecode.c
--- usr.bin/uudecode/uudecode.c 27
lpr(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/common.c
===
RCS file:
/Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -a -p -u -r1.33 common.c
---
diff3(1).
--steffen
Index: usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c
===
RCS file: /Users/steffen/arena/code.openbsd/src/usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -a -p -u -r1.11 diff3prog.c
--- usr.bin/diff3/diff3prog.c 27 Oct
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:12:51PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
Diff below is a rewrite the vgafb_pci_probe(). The idea is to save the
different PCI bars in the device structure for later access in drm(4).
It also simplifies the code to make it looks more like vga(4).
Ok?
Martin
Hi,
hi,
here's a diff that adds support for the SMBus controller found
on AMD CS5536:
glxpcib0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 AMD CS5536 ISA rev 0x03: rev 3, 32-bit
3579545Hz timer, watchdog, gpio, i2c
gpio0 at glxpcib0: 32 pins
iic0 at glxpcib0
maxtmp0 at iic0 addr 0x4c: lm86
# sysctl hw.sensors
Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the base is unlocked, we can consider diffs to
a) rename getdelim() and getline() symbols that are already in the tree, and
b) add getdelim() and getline() to libc.
Note that (a) will need to go in before (b)...
I also expect some fallout
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 04:50:21PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the base is unlocked, we can consider diffs to
a) rename getdelim() and getline() symbols that are already in the tree, and
b) add getdelim() and getline() to libc.
The latest iteration includes:
- Removal of ldns-includes, -library and -manpages;
- Static link of ldns;
- No shared libraries.
There was a nasty config-error in Makefile.bsd-wrapper which has been fixed in:
http://gateway.hydroxide.nl/OpenBSD/unbound-wip.8.tar.gz
This iteration also
According to http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/15/3,
it would be preferable to use something else than ':' when an error
is encountered.
According to crypt(3), crypt() should return NULL values on errors.
Index: src/lib/libc/crypt/bcrypt.c
12 matches
Mail list logo
